회사법판례의 변화와 전망
The change and prospect of cases on corporation in Korea
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The volumes of the cases on corporate law are accumulating in Korea, so it is pointed the importance of the cases as related to the actual society. We can learn from the cases the flows of changes of corporate law, and they work sometime as standard in analyzing the new legal systems. There were many changes in cases on corporate law. Especially, after IMF, it was induced many American systems in our corporate law. So, that trends was reflected to the corporate cases. At this notes, 30 topics were selected among corporate cases which have many changes in position, reflects the changes in legislation, and have opposite position to the scholar's theory. Among the 30 topics, I can point two representative cases which reflect the flows of changes in corporation. First, the changes of cases on the piercing the corporate veil. To apply the theory of the piercing the corporate veil, it is needed ① absence of formalities of corporate existence ② perpetration of fraud by means of the corporate vehicles. In order to test weather it is absence of formalities of corporate existence, important factors are ① inadequate capitalization ② personal use of corporate funds. Second, we can point the cases on the The business judgment rule. The business judgment rule is admitted to encourage the inventiveness of the director. it was developed in case law of the America. In our country it is also needed to encourage director's inventiveness. So, it is notable that our supreme court take affirmative position on that theory and give standard to apply the business judgment rule. In order to apply that rule the management by the director should not be illegal. In order to apply the business judgement rule the court demand three standard. First, it should be done full informed with respect to the subject. Second, rationally believes that the business judgement is in the best interests of the corporation. Third, it should be done with the care that an ordinarily prudent person would reasonably be expected to exercise in a like position and under similar circumstances.
Abstract
The volumes of the cases on corporate law are accumulating in Korea, so it is pointed the importance of the cases as related to the actual society. We can learn from the cases the flows of changes of corporate law, and they work sometime as standard in analyzing the new legal systems. There were many changes in cases on corporate law. Especially, after IMF, it was induced many American systems in our corporate law. So, that trends was reflected to the corporate cases. At this notes, 30 topics were selected among corporate cases which have many changes in position, reflects the changes in legislation, and have opposite position to the scholar's theory. Among the 30 topics, I can point two representative cases which reflect the flows of changes in corporation. First, the changes of cases on the piercing the corporate veil. To apply the theory of the piercing the corporate veil, it is needed ① absence of formalities of corporate existence ② perpetration of fraud by means of the corporate vehicles. In order to test weather it is absence of formalities of corporate existence, important factors are ① inadequate capitalization ② personal use of corporate funds. Second, we can point the cases on the The business judgment rule. The business judgment rule is admitted to encourage the inventiveness of the director. it was developed in case law of the America. In our country it is also needed to encourage director's inventiveness. So, it is notable that our supreme court take affirmative position on that theory and give standard to apply the business judgment rule. In order to apply that rule the management by the director should not be illegal. In order to apply the business judgement rule the court demand three standard. First, it should be done full informed with respect to the subject. Second, rationally believes that the business judgement is in the best interests of the corporation. Third, it should be done with the care that an ordinarily prudent person would reasonably be expected to exercise in a like position and under similar circumstances.
참고문헌 (24)
- 정희철, "상법학(상)" (1989), 박영사
- 서돈각, "「상법(상)」(제4전정)" (1999), 법문사
- 최기원, "상법학신론(상)(제15판)" (2004), 박영사
- 최기원, "신회사법론(제13대정판)" (2009), 박영사
- 손주찬, "상법(상)(제15보정판)" (2004), 박영사
- 강위두, "「회사법」(제3전정판)" (2002), 형설출판사
- 정동윤, "「회사법」(제6판)" (2000), 법문사
- 임홍근, "회사법" (2000), 법문사
- 이기수, "회사법" (2002), 박영사
- 정찬형, "「상법강의 (상)」, (제12판)" (2009), 박영사
- 정찬형, "회사법강의(제3판)" (2003), 홍문사
- 이철송, "회사법강의(제16판)" (2009), 박영사
- 서헌제, "사례중심체계「상법강의」(상)" (2001), 법문사
- 서헌제, "사례중심체계「회사법」" (2000), 법문사
- 권기범, "「현대회사법론」(제2판)" (2005), 삼지원
- 권기범, "기업구조조정법" (1998), 삼지원
- 최준선, "회사법(제2판" (2006), 삼영사
- 김영호, "회사법신론" (2000), 팔마도서
- 정경영, "상법학강의" (2007), 박영사
- 원용수, "법인격부인〔남용〕의 법리의 성립요건(대상판례: 대법원 2006.8.25. 선고 2004다 26119판결)", 상사판례연구, 20(1), pp.29~56 (2007), 한국상사판례학회
- 정진세, "재산인수의 의미와 사후설립의 유효성, 법률신문, 2250호", ~
- 정동윤, "종류주주총회의 결의를 얻지 아니한 정관변경결의의 효력", 상법연구의 향기(정희철교수정년20년기념) (2004)
- 강희갑, "경영판단의 원칙에 관한 미국법의 최근동향", 상사법연구, 15(2) (1996)
- 이영봉, "경영판단의 법칙의 수용에 관한 검토", 상사법연구, 19(1) (2000)
