본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

독일 보험계약법 제28조의 계약상의 간접의무에 대한 연구

A study on indirect duty per contract by article 28 german insurance law

1

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Recently the reform of insurance contract law is not only in germany and japan, but also in korea hot issue. The insurance contract law has experienced significant change recently in many countries worldwide. Especially in germany and in japan there was heavy reform in the field of insurance contract law. The current korean insurance contract law in korean commercial code was effected in 1963. It has many problems. The reform discussion about korean insurance contract law is being done in national assembly. In insurance contract law indirect duty plays very important role. Duty of disclosure and duty of notice are the examples. In germany the insurance contract law(VVG) divides indirect duty into two categories, namely indirect duty per law and indirect duty per contract. Duty of disclosure and duty of notice belong to indirect duty per law. The insured and insurer can also agree other special duties of insured. These belong to indirect duty per contract. Article 28 german insurance contract law regulates this indirect duty per contract. Thereby the insured can be protected from overreaching effect of such a duty. In korea there is almost no discussion about indirect duty per contract. Because of this reason, the interest of insured can be neglected. To solve the problems we must look at foreign laws. Especially the german insurance contract law has influences to korean law because we adopted the continental legal system. The german insurance contract law was reformed in 2007 significantly. It was effected on 1. jan. 2008. The article 28 german insurance contract law was regulated in article 6 at the old law. There are many discussion and court cases about article 28 german insurance contract law. This study concentrates on showing the current problems of insurance contract law in regard of the relations between indirect duty per law and indirect duty per contract. The author has meanwhile tried to provide some suggestions about reform of o provide some suggestions about regard of indirect duty per contractout retrospective point of viewregard oftried to show the right direction for ter contracabout indirect duty per contract and its violation effects.

Abstract

Recently the reform of insurance contract law is not only in germany and japan, but also in korea hot issue. The insurance contract law has experienced significant change recently in many countries worldwide. Especially in germany and in japan there was heavy reform in the field of insurance contract law. The current korean insurance contract law in korean commercial code was effected in 1963. It has many problems. The reform discussion about korean insurance contract law is being done in national assembly. In insurance contract law indirect duty plays very important role. Duty of disclosure and duty of notice are the examples. In germany the insurance contract law(VVG) divides indirect duty into two categories, namely indirect duty per law and indirect duty per contract. Duty of disclosure and duty of notice belong to indirect duty per law. The insured and insurer can also agree other special duties of insured. These belong to indirect duty per contract. Article 28 german insurance contract law regulates this indirect duty per contract. Thereby the insured can be protected from overreaching effect of such a duty. In korea there is almost no discussion about indirect duty per contract. Because of this reason, the interest of insured can be neglected. To solve the problems we must look at foreign laws. Especially the german insurance contract law has influences to korean law because we adopted the continental legal system. The german insurance contract law was reformed in 2007 significantly. It was effected on 1. jan. 2008. The article 28 german insurance contract law was regulated in article 6 at the old law. There are many discussion and court cases about article 28 german insurance contract law. This study concentrates on showing the current problems of insurance contract law in regard of the relations between indirect duty per law and indirect duty per contract. The author has meanwhile tried to provide some suggestions about reform of o provide some suggestions about regard of indirect duty per contractout retrospective point of viewregard oftried to show the right direction for ter contracabout indirect duty per contract and its violation effects.

참고문헌 (26)

  1. 김선정, "보험계약상 고지의무에 관한 최근판례와 연구동향", 상사법연구, 14(2) (1995)
  2. 김은경, "독일보험계약법 개혁과 그 시사점", 상사법연구, 25(4), pp.223~269 (2007), 한국상사법학회
  3. 김은경, "중과실비례보상제도에 대한 소고", 보험법연구, 2(2) (2008), 보험법학회
  4. 김정호, "보험계약법상의 책무론", 법학논집, 31 (1995), 고려대학교 법학연구소
  5. 김준호, "민법강의", ~ (2004)
  6. 김형배, "채권총론", ~ (1992)
  7. 명순구, "민법총칙", ~ (2005)
  8. 정찬형, "상법강의(하), 제11판", ~ (2009)
  9. 양승규, "보험법 제5판", ~ (2004)
  10. 이기수, "보험·해상법, 제8판", ~ (2008)
  11. 이병준, "약관규제법의 민법편입문제", 한국소비자법학회 제1회 학술대회 자료집 (2009)
  12. 이준형, "約款規制法‧消費者法의 民法에의 統合問題에 대한 管見 ― 프랑스의 경험을 소재로 ―", 재산법연구, 26(2), pp.313~348 (2009), 한국재산법학회
  13. 장덕조, "2007년도 보험법 판례의 동향과 그 연구", 상사판례연구, 21(2), pp.361~395 (2008), 한국상사판례학회
  14. 채이식, "상법강의(하) 개정판", ~ (2003)
  15. 한기정, "고지의무의 수동화 - 자발적 고지의무에서 수동적 응답의무로 -", 비교사법, 16(3), pp.325~363 (2009), 한국비교사법학회
  16. 한창희, "현대 보험법의 동향", ~ (2009)
  17. "Bruck", Möller, Versicherungsvertragsgesetz, Bd. I, 9. Aufl., Berlin, 2008
  18. "Gärtner, Privatversicherungsrecht, Darmstadt", ~ (1980)
  19. "Deutsch, Das neue Versicherungsvertragsrecht, 6. Aufl., Karlsruhe", ~ (2008)
  20. "Niederleithinger, Das neue VVG, Baden-Baden", ~ (2007)
  21. "Römer", Langheid, Versicherungsvertragsgesetz, 2. Aufl., München, 2003
  22. "Rüffer", Halbach, pp.2009, ~
  23. "Schimikowski, Versicherungsvertragsrecht, 2. Aufl., München", ~ (2001)
  24. "Terbille(Hrsg.), Münchener Anwalts Handbuch Versicherungsrecht, München", ~ (2008)
  25. "Weyers, Versicherungsvertragsrecht, 2. Aufl.", ~ (1995)
  26. "Weyers", Wandt, Versicherungsvertragsrecht, 3. Aufl., 2003

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (25건)