상법상 해상운송인의 운송물에 관한 주의의무(제795조)의 해석론적 비교 검토
Comparative Study on Construction of Article 795(1) of Korean Commercial Code
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In the Article Ⅲ(1) of Hague-Visby Rules, subject to the provisions of Article Ⅳ, the carrier shall properly and carefully load, handle, stow, carry, keep, care for, and discharge the goods carried. This Article is adopted in Article 795(1) of Korean Commercial Code, but with some variation. The standard of ‘properly and carefully’ is not different from that of ‘due diligence’ in Korean Commercial Code. Hague-Visby Rules imposes some specific obligations about how the carrier must perform its contract, for example, and detail some of the legal consequences of the carrier's failure to perform, but it does not explicitly declare the carrier's most basic obligation simply to perform the core contract. However, the Rotterdam Rules' treatment of carrier's obligations begins by making explicit what the Hague-Visby Rules leaves implicit. Article 11 declares, in essence, that the carrier must perform the core obligations under its contract. It employs what has often been described as a ‘reversed burden of proof’, meaning that carrier (typically the defendant) must disprove its fault in order to escape liability (once the claimant has established a prima facie case). This differs from the allocation commonly employed in many jurisdictions to determine fault-based liability under which the plaintiff must prove the defendant's fault as part of its affirmative case in order to recover.
Abstract
In the Article Ⅲ(1) of Hague-Visby Rules, subject to the provisions of Article Ⅳ, the carrier shall properly and carefully load, handle, stow, carry, keep, care for, and discharge the goods carried. This Article is adopted in Article 795(1) of Korean Commercial Code, but with some variation. The standard of ‘properly and carefully’ is not different from that of ‘due diligence’ in Korean Commercial Code. Hague-Visby Rules imposes some specific obligations about how the carrier must perform its contract, for example, and detail some of the legal consequences of the carrier's failure to perform, but it does not explicitly declare the carrier's most basic obligation simply to perform the core contract. However, the Rotterdam Rules' treatment of carrier's obligations begins by making explicit what the Hague-Visby Rules leaves implicit. Article 11 declares, in essence, that the carrier must perform the core obligations under its contract. It employs what has often been described as a ‘reversed burden of proof’, meaning that carrier (typically the defendant) must disprove its fault in order to escape liability (once the claimant has established a prima facie case). This differs from the allocation commonly employed in many jurisdictions to determine fault-based liability under which the plaintiff must prove the defendant's fault as part of its affirmative case in order to recover.
참고문헌 (23)
- 김인현, "FIO 契約條件과 그 有效性 및 船上度의 法律關係", 상사판례연구, 19(1), pp.157~185 (2006), 한국상사판례학회
- 송옥렬, "해상운송에 관한 로테르담 규칙의 쟁점 및 전망", 통상법률, (88), pp.64~93 (2009), 법무부
- 유중원, "航海傭船契約에서 FIO 특약(조건)과 船上渡의 법리 연구", 인권과 정의, (394), pp.128~142 (2009), 대한변호사협회
- FIO 약관과 운송인의 책임, In 국제규범의 현황과 전망 -2007년 국제규범 연구반 연구보고-, "이성철", 법원행정처, ~ (2008)
- 이창희, "상법 제788조 1항의 해석에 관한 연구", 한국해법학회지, 27(2), pp.39~74 (2005), 한국해법학회
- 장희목, "해상물건운송인의 손해배상책임", 사법논집, 10 (1979), 법원행정처
- 정영석, "해상운송인의 상사과실", 한국해법학회지, 16(1) (1994)
- 조종주, "로테르담 규칙하에서의 거증책임", 해양비지니스, (15) (2010)
- 진상범, "화주가 선적·적부·양륙작업에 관하여 화주가 위험과 책임을 부담하기로 하는 약정이 구 상법 제790조에 반하여 무효인지 여부, In 대법원판례해설(2010년 상)(제83호)" (2010)
- 최종현, "선하증권상의 FIO조항의 효력", 법조, 56(2), pp.82~144 (2007), 법조협회
- 최종현, "해상고유의 위험으로 인한 운송인의 면책 (대상판례:서울지방법원 2002가합13497 판결)", 한국해법학회지, 26(2), pp.229~244 (2004), 한국해법학회
- 原茂太一, "堪航能力擔保義務論" (1983), 千倉書房
- 田中誠二, "海商法詳論" (1985), 千倉書房
- Maraist Frank L, "Cases and Materials on Maritime Law" (2003), West Group
- Mocatta, A. A., "Scrutton on charterparties and bills of lading" (1984), Sweet & Maxwell
- Richardson, John, "The Hague and Hague-Visby Rules" (1998), LLP
- Schoenbaum, Thomas, J., "Admiralty and Maritime Law, 3rd ed." (2001), West Group
- Tetley, William, "Marine Cargo Claims, 3rd ed." (1988), International Publications
- Thomas, D Rhidian, "A New Convention for the Carriage of Goods by Sea - The Rotterdam Rules" (2009), Lawtext Publishing Limited
- Von Ziegler, Alexander, "The Rotterdam Rules 2008 -Commentary to the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Carriage of Goods Wholly or Partly by Sea" (2010), Kluwer Law International
- Baughen, Simon, "Defining the Limits of the Carrier's Responsibilities", Lloyd's Maritme and Commercial Law Quarterly (2005)
- Sturley, M. F., "Modernizing and Reforming U.S. Maritime Law: The Rotterdam Rules in the United States", Texas International Law Journal (2009)
- Von Ziegler, Alexander, "The Liability of the Contracting Carrier", Texas International Journal, 44 (2009)