2011년 회사법 판례상의 주요 쟁점
Review the case on corporate law in 2011
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper research on three issues of the corporate law. First, repurchases of it’s own shares by corporate. Old Korean’s commercial code restricted repurchases of it’s own shares. But it was permitted to repurchase shares of it’s own by the amendment of commercial code, provided that the money to repurchases shares comes from distributable profits and existing shareholders are given equal opportunity to sell their shares. In this care it was the issue that purchases on the company’s account but at another’s name also regulated by the provision of commercial code of repurchases of it’s own shares. Supreme court required two element for the share purchases by another’s name to be purchases on company’s account. ① the corporate should give financial aid to the acquirer. ② benefit and loss from shares repurchases should belong to the corporate. Under revised provision, if the corporate repurchases it’s own shares by another’s name, it will be illegal and can be void. Second. the liability of a mutual saving bank director on project finance loan. In the case the issue was wether the business judgement rule can be applied. In order to apply that rule the management by the director should not be illegal. They point the standard to apply the business judgement rule that the director should be informed with respect to the subject enough and he should execute the management to the best interests of the corporate. Third, Corporate divisions. Generally the transferor corporate and transferee corporate are jointly liable for the debts owned by the transferee company before the corporate division. Exceptionally the liability can several when transferee corporate burden only separate liability of the invested assets by the special agreement. In that case the transferor should notify to the known creditors of the fact of separated liability. If they neglect notifying the fact, the transferor corporate and transferee corporate should burden the joint liability. The supreme court admit the range of known creditors broadly.
Abstract
This paper research on three issues of the corporate law. First, repurchases of it’s own shares by corporate. Old Korean’s commercial code restricted repurchases of it’s own shares. But it was permitted to repurchase shares of it’s own by the amendment of commercial code, provided that the money to repurchases shares comes from distributable profits and existing shareholders are given equal opportunity to sell their shares. In this care it was the issue that purchases on the company’s account but at another’s name also regulated by the provision of commercial code of repurchases of it’s own shares. Supreme court required two element for the share purchases by another’s name to be purchases on company’s account. ① the corporate should give financial aid to the acquirer. ② benefit and loss from shares repurchases should belong to the corporate. Under revised provision, if the corporate repurchases it’s own shares by another’s name, it will be illegal and can be void. Second. the liability of a mutual saving bank director on project finance loan. In the case the issue was wether the business judgement rule can be applied. In order to apply that rule the management by the director should not be illegal. They point the standard to apply the business judgement rule that the director should be informed with respect to the subject enough and he should execute the management to the best interests of the corporate. Third, Corporate divisions. Generally the transferor corporate and transferee corporate are jointly liable for the debts owned by the transferee company before the corporate division. Exceptionally the liability can several when transferee corporate burden only separate liability of the invested assets by the special agreement. In that case the transferor should notify to the known creditors of the fact of separated liability. If they neglect notifying the fact, the transferor corporate and transferee corporate should burden the joint liability. The supreme court admit the range of known creditors broadly.
참고문헌 (20)
- 강위두, "회사법(제3전정판)" (2002), 형설출판사
- 정찬형, "상법강의(상)(제9판)" (2006), 박영사
- 손주찬, "상법(상)" (2004), 박영사
- 정희철, "상법학(상)" (1989), 박영사
- 정찬형, "상법강의(상) (제15판)" (2011), 박영사
- 정동윤, "회사법" (2001), 법문사
- 최기원, "상법학신론(상)" (2004), 박영사
- 정찬형, "회사법강의(제2판)" (2002), 박영사
- 안택식, "회사법 해설 법률지식 -개정2판-" (2000), 청림출판
- 심영, (2009), 박영사
- 심영, (2009), 박영사
- 김이수, "他人名義, 會社計算에 의한 自己株式 取得의 判斷基準에 관한 考察 - 대법원 2011.4.28. 선고 2009다23610 판결을 대상으로 -", 상사판례연구, 25(2), pp.41~77 (2012), 한국상사판례학회[DOI]
- 안성포, "자기주식취득의 허용에 따른 법적 쟁점", 상사법연구, 30(2), pp.73~104 (2011), 한국상사법학회
- 김순석, "상법개정안상 자기주식 및 주식소각 제도의 검토", 일감법학, (18), pp.135~190 (2010), 법학연구소
- 권영준, "프로젝트 파이낸스 대출에 관한 저축은행 이사의 손해배상책임", 비교사법, 19(1), pp.213~254 (2012), 한국비교사법학회
- 양기진, "상호저축은행의 부동산 프로젝트 파이낸싱에 대한 소고", 기업법연구, 25(4), pp.299~328 (2011), 한국기업법학회
- 김재범, "대출결정시 금융기관 이사의 주의의무와 경영판단의 원칙 -대상판결 : 대법원 2006.11.9. 선고 2004다41651, 41668 판결-", 상사판례연구, 21(1), pp.3~35 (2008), 한국상사판례학회
- 이영봉, "경영판단의 법칙의 수용에 관한 검토", 상사법연구, 19(1) (2000)
- 송옥렬, "기업분할형 구조조정과 채권자보호의 정합성", 기업법연구, 26(2), pp.53~73 (2012), 한국기업법학회[DOI]
- 노혁준, "회사분할관련 최근 판례들의 비판적 검토", 상사판례연구, 25(2), pp.79~125 (2012), 한국상사판례학회[DOI]
