『유가론기(瑜伽論記)』의 달사(達師) 연구

Abstract

The purpose of this manuscript is to take a look at the whereabouts of Dalsa (達師) and the tendency of his annotation that are quoted 97 times in Yugaron-gi (瑜伽論記), which had been compiled by Dunryun (遁倫). Although Dalsa is a figure that gets mentioned the seventh most in Yugaron-gi, because, until now, the materials regarding him have nearly not been delivered, regarding his origin and the contents of the annotations, they nearly could not be researched. First, regarding the preexistent assumption that Dalsa could be a Buddhist monk from Silla, although this manuscript, too, could not definitely decide, the range could be narrowed. Also, at the time (647-648) when Yugaron (瑜伽論, Skt. Yogācārabhūmi-śāstra), ) had been translated into Chinese, it looks like Dalsa had personally attended a lecture by Xuanzang (玄奘). And it seems that his commentary of Yugaron appeared after the year 659, when Chengweishi-lun (成唯識論) had been translated. In addition to this, in the two type’s of woodblock-printed book of Yugaron-gi, by examining the phenomenon in which Dalsa (達師) and Wonsa (遠師) were entangled, it was confirmed that the contents of Yugaron-gi, which had been passed down to Japan were accurate. Regarding the annotations tendency of Dalsa, centered on the fifth section of Yugaron (攝事分), the three kinds were taken a look into. First, the annotations of Dalsa have been in charge of the role of supplementing the view of Gyeongsa (景師), which becomes the pivot annotations of the fifth section of Yugaron. Except, it was able to confirm that, regarding the annotations of Dalsa, Dunryun had been sticking to a kind of the critical attitude. Secondly, among the diverse concepts that come out in the fifth section of Yugaron, Dalsa has been very specifically explaining regarding the point that looks contradictory or that is thought to have a problem with the context. Through this, we can find out that he had been a figure who had possessed the very specialized knowledge regarding the terms that come out in Yugaron. Thirdly, in the fifth section of Yugaron, Dalsa has been presenting a very detailed Gwamok (科目). This is even more detailed than Dunryun and Gyeongsa. Hence, although it had not been existing, we can try assuming that the commentary of Yugaron by Dalsa are very detailed with regard to not only the contents of the annotations but, also, with regard to the classification system.