『瑜伽師地論』의 알라야식 存在 論證에 관한 『瑜伽論記』의 주석- 제1상 依止執受證을 중심으로 -

Abstract

This paper explores the first argument for the existence of the ālayavijn˜āna in the Notes on the Yogācārabhūmi (Yugaron-gi, 瑜伽論記) writtenby Sillan Master Doryun (道倫). This part is usually called the “ProofPortion” of the “Ālayavijn˜āna Treaties” in the Yogācārabhūmi. The fullproof consists of an eightfold argument for the existence of the ālayavijn˜āna. However, this paper only focuses on the first argument, which iscomprised of fivefold subarguments. The Songzang yizhen (宋藏遺珍) version was adopted as a mainsource of the Notes on the Yogācārabhūmi. Then that version wascollated using the Taishō edition and A Summary Concise Compendiumof the Yogācārabhūmi (瑜伽師地論略纂) to correct typos. Explanationsof the Commentaries on the Vijn˜aptimātratāsiddhiśāstra (成唯識論述記)were introduced to enrich discussions in related parts. Both A SummaryConcise Compendium of the Yogācārabhūmi and the Commentaries onthe Vijn˜aptimātratāsiddhiśāstra were written by Chinese Master Jī (基)There are five results from this research:First, the Notes on the Yogācārabhūmi adopts interpretations of ASummary Concise Compendium of the Yogācārabhūmi especially in this“Proof Portion.” Second, the Notes on the Yogācārabhūmi contains othermasters’ explanations that are not included in A Summary ConciseCompendium of the Yogācārabhūmi. Third, both the Notes on theYogācārabhūmi and A Summary Concise Compendium of theYogācārabhūmi make full use of the Buddhist logic to express their arguments and to refute other opinions. Fourth, both texts are relateddeeply to the Vijn˜aptimātratāsiddhiśāstra and its Commentary written byMaster Jī (基). Fifth, both texts do not make mention of a tenfoldargument of the Vijn˜aptimātratāsiddhiśāstra or the argument of theMahāyānasaṃgraha (攝大乘論). On the other hand, the Commentaries onthe Vijn˜aptimātratāsiddhiśāstra rates its tenfold argument high incomparison with the eightfold argument in the Yogācārabhūmi.