獨逸, 日本, 美國에서 持株會社의 株主保護方案에 관한 考察
The Protection of Shareholders' Interest in Holding Company
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Korea has been regulated holding companies to prevent business groups from acquiring too much power, but there are troubles on restricting company shape and going backward global Business Economy. If A certain large enterprise(so called, SAEBUL(group of companies)) becomes a Holding Company, it scarcely controls all its subsidiaries. In this point of view, it is important on Corporation Law that the shareholders' protection of Holding Company and that of minority shareholders, creditor in Korea. First, A large enterprise has been thought of "Konzern(conglomerate)" to protect the shareholders of Holding Company in Germany. That is, Konzern is the company combination which one or more than two subordinate companies is combined below the right to unitary command of a dominant company, and more than two companies are combined by the contract in each legally(AktG§18). The Supervision of the board of directors to protect the shareholders of Holding Company's relation is valid in Konzern, and the director with Konzern Führung(right to command) in Ober(Holding) gesellschaft manages or controls the company, and charge of the responsibility. Also, except the board of directors, through other organ or third party(audit, general meeting, inspector etc.), they control and supervision the company and the important matters need require approval of Holding Company's general meeting. Second, they have been discussed about the shareholders' protection of Holding Company in Japan. There are two methods, the one controls the subsidiary's business operating through Holding Company or the company's director and audit indirectly, the two is concerned in subsidiary's management by Holding Company's shareholders directly. That is, the director of Holding Company reflects shareholder's voting right in Holding Company's severe matters, and the audit of Holding Company have to be given a general and inclusive authority to the subsidiary. Also, the shareholders of subsidiary have to be given the information right, the account book and document inspection, the representative action to director or the voting right to making decision of the subsidiary. Third, double(multi) derivative action is a method to protect the shareholder's protection in America, it is given for the shareholder of Holding Company to the subsidiary's director. In particular, the 100% subsidiary's damages is rarely compensated by director's legal proceedings, therefore the shareholders of subsidiaries could make a representative action(double(multi) derivative action) to the directors of subsidiary. Nowadays, the shareholder's protection is unsatisfactory with Holding Company' operating in Korean Law. To operate Holding Company desirably and protect the shareholders of Holding Company in the future, the methods of advanced nations -the shareholder's protection in German Konzern, director's or audit's indirect and shareholder's direct control in Japanese Law, shareholder's representative action in American Law- are investigated in depth.
Abstract
Korea has been regulated holding companies to prevent business groups from acquiring too much power, but there are troubles on restricting company shape and going backward global Business Economy. If A certain large enterprise(so called, SAEBUL(group of companies)) becomes a Holding Company, it scarcely controls all its subsidiaries. In this point of view, it is important on Corporation Law that the shareholders' protection of Holding Company and that of minority shareholders, creditor in Korea. First, A large enterprise has been thought of "Konzern(conglomerate)" to protect the shareholders of Holding Company in Germany. That is, Konzern is the company combination which one or more than two subordinate companies is combined below the right to unitary command of a dominant company, and more than two companies are combined by the contract in each legally(AktG§18). The Supervision of the board of directors to protect the shareholders of Holding Company's relation is valid in Konzern, and the director with Konzern Führung(right to command) in Ober(Holding) gesellschaft manages or controls the company, and charge of the responsibility. Also, except the board of directors, through other organ or third party(audit, general meeting, inspector etc.), they control and supervision the company and the important matters need require approval of Holding Company's general meeting. Second, they have been discussed about the shareholders' protection of Holding Company in Japan. There are two methods, the one controls the subsidiary's business operating through Holding Company or the company's director and audit indirectly, the two is concerned in subsidiary's management by Holding Company's shareholders directly. That is, the director of Holding Company reflects shareholder's voting right in Holding Company's severe matters, and the audit of Holding Company have to be given a general and inclusive authority to the subsidiary. Also, the shareholders of subsidiary have to be given the information right, the account book and document inspection, the representative action to director or the voting right to making decision of the subsidiary. Third, double(multi) derivative action is a method to protect the shareholder's protection in America, it is given for the shareholder of Holding Company to the subsidiary's director. In particular, the 100% subsidiary's damages is rarely compensated by director's legal proceedings, therefore the shareholders of subsidiaries could make a representative action(double(multi) derivative action) to the directors of subsidiary. Nowadays, the shareholder's protection is unsatisfactory with Holding Company' operating in Korean Law. To operate Holding Company desirably and protect the shareholders of Holding Company in the future, the methods of advanced nations -the shareholder's protection in German Konzern, director's or audit's indirect and shareholder's direct control in Japanese Law, shareholder's representative action in American Law- are investigated in depth.
참고문헌 (87)
- 강위두, "會社法" (2000), 형설출판사
- 강위두, "法人格否認의 法理의 적용범위와 적용요건", 상사판례연구, 3 (1989)
- 권기범, "獨逸法上의 콘체른 設立統制 및 經營統制", 商事法硏究, 11 (1992), 韓國商事法學會
- 권기범, "現代會社法論" (2007), 三知院
- 권기범, "企業構造調整法" (1999), 삼지원
- 권오승, "企業結合規制法論" (1991), 法文社
- 김대연, "從屬會社 理事의 違法行爲와 支配會社 株主의 保護", 상사판례연구, 16 (2004), 한국상사판례학회
- 김정호, "子會社의 設立과 母會社 少數株主의 保護 in 司法行政" (1992)
- 남장우, "會社法人格無視의 法理", 박사, pp.1996
- 손 성, "法人格否認의 法理", 박사, pp.1986
- 손주찬, "제14정판 商法(上)" (2003), 박영사
- 송옥렬, "현행 商法上 二重代表訴訟의 허용여부", 민사판례연구, 28 (2006), 민사판례연구회
- 송종준, "母會社의 소수파주주의 보호-PASS THROUGH이론을 중심으로-", 法學硏究, 4 (1992), 충북대학교 법학연구소
- 申鉉允, "企業結合에 따른 會社法理의 再構成", 延世法學硏究, 3 (1994)
- 柳珍熙, "콘체른(Konzern)에서 母會社株主의 保護-獨逸聯邦最高裁判所의 Holzmuller判決을 中心으로", 商事法硏究, 11 (1992)
- 李光佑, "持株會社에서의 少數株主 및 債權者保護方案에 관한 硏究", 석사, pp.2000
- 李光佑, "持株會社" (2002), 세창출판사
- 李光佑, "持株會社에 있어서 여러 법적분쟁의 해결방안에 관한 연구", 경영법률, 15(2) (2005), 한국경영법률학회
- 이남기, "經濟法" (2002), 박영사
- 이철송, "會社法講義" (2004), 박영사
- 전삼현, "持株會社의 構造와 運營上 改善課題", 상장협, (49) (2004), 한국상장회사협의회
- 정병석, "二重代表訴訟의 허용가능성", 기업법연구, 19(1)통권 : 20 (2005)
- 정찬형, "會社法講義" (2003), 홍문사
- 최기원, "商法學新論(上)" (2002), 博英社
- 최기원, "新會社法論" (2001), 박영사
- 崔星根, "持株會社의 解禁과 상법관련제도에 관한 硏究" (1999), 韓國法制硏究院
- 황근수, "持株會社의 株主保護方案 in 企業法硏究" (2003), 한국기업법학회
- 江頭憲治郞, "座談會 純粹持株會社の規制緩和をめぐる諸問題", 商事法務, (1388) (1995)
- 關俊彦, "救濟方法としての代表訴訟", 證券硏究, 71 (1984)
- 根岸 哲, "持株會社と獨占禁止法 in 持株會社の法的諸問題" (1995), 資本市場硏究會
- 吉本健一, "株式交換ㆍ 株式移轉と會社分割の理論的 檢討", 商事法務, (1545) (1999)
- 吉田俊宏, "持株會社をめぐる商法上の諸問題に關する硏究報告の槪要『上』", 상사법무, (1486) (1998)
- 大隅建一郞, "新版 株式會社變遷論" (1978), 有斐閣
- 都銀懇話會, "金融持株會社の 調査ㆍ硏究(下)", 商事法務, (1501) (1998)
- 浜田道代, "持株會社と株主の地位 in 持株會社의 法的 諸問題" (1998), 資本市場硏究會
- 浜田道代, "持株會社の株主 in 持株會社의 法的 諸問題" (1995), 資本市場硏究會
- 浜田道代, "代位訴訟", 證券硏究, 94 (1991)
- 森本 滋, "純粹持株會社と會社法", 법조, 47 (1995)
- 森本 滋, "親子會社法制をめぐる諸問題", 商事法務, (1500) (1998)
- 三枝一雄, "純粹持株會社の株主保護 in 企業社會と商事法" (1999), 北樹出版
- 石山卓磨, "現代會社法講義" (2003), 成文堂
- 神作裕之, "純粹持株會社における株主保護(上)", 商事法務, (1429) (1996)
- 原田晃治, "『親子會社法制等に關する問題點』の解說", 상사법무, (1497) (1998)
- 柴田和史, "純粹持株會社を前提とした商法上の諸問題", 資本市場, (127) (1996)
- 柴田和史, "持株會社による企業組織と商法", ジュリ, (1123) (1997)
- ?田公明, "純粹持株會社と株主代表訴訟", ジュリスト, (1140) (1998)
- 前田雅弘, "持株會社", 상사법무, (1466) (1997)
- 前田 庸, "會社法入門" (2003), 有斐閣
- 酒券俊, "純粹持株會社と會社法上の問題", ジュリ, (1104) (1997)
- 丹羽哲夫, "持株會社がわかる本" (2000), 일본능률협회
- 春田博, "アメリカにおける重層代表訴訟の展開 in 現代英美會社法の諸相ㆍ長濱洋一 敎授還曆記念" (1996), 成文堂
- 黑沼悅郞, "持株會社の法的諸問題(3)", 月刊資本市場, (120) (1995)
- Buhner, "Management-Holding in der Praxis", pp.10~ (1987), DBW
- Charles Alan Wright, "Federal Practice and Procedure", pp.1821~ (1986)
- Deborah A. DeMott, "Shareholder Derivative Actions §2:02, 1994 & Supp", ~ (1997)
- Ebenroth, "Konzernbildungs-und Konzernleitungskontrolle", ~ (1987)
- Henzler, "Management-Holding: Leitungsfahige Strukturalternative, aber kein Allheilmittel" (1987), DBW
- Hirte, "Bezugsrechtsausschluß und Konzernbildung", ~ (1986)
- Hoffmann-Becking, "Munchener Handbuch des Gesellschaftsrechts, Band 4", ~ (1988)
- Hommelhoff, "Die Konzernleitungspflicht", ~ (1982)
- H.W. Ballantine, "Ballantine on Corporations, 350, revised ed", ~ (1946)
- James C. Bonbright, "The holding company" (1932), Maple Press Company
- James D. Cox, "Corporations, §15.10,1995", ~ (1995)
- Keller, "Unternehmungsfuhrung mit Holdingkonzepten 1. Aufl.", ~ (1990)
- Kleinschnittger, "Beteiligungs-Controlling", ~ (1993)
- Koppensteiner, "Kolner Komm, AktG, 2. Aufl", ~ (1987)
- Krieger, "Munchener Handbuch des Gesellschaftsrechts, Band 4", ~ (1988)
- Marcus. Lutter, "Rechte und Pflichten des Aufsichtsrats, 3. Aufl", ~ (1993)
- Marcus, "Organzustandigkeiten im Konzern" (1985), FS Stimpel
- Marcus, "Holding-Handbuch" (1998), Otto. Schmidt
- Marcus, "Information und Vertraulichkeit im Aufsichtsrat, 2. Aufl", ~ (1984)
- Martens, "Der Grundsatz gemeinsamer Vorstandverantwortung" (1988), FS Fleck
- Martens, "Kolner Kommentar Aktiengesetz, 2. Aufl", ~ (1985)
- Melvin A. Eisenberg, "The Structure of the Corporation" (1976), Little, Brown and Company
- Phillip I. Blumberg, "The Law of Corporate Group: Procedural Problems in the Law of Parent and Subsidiary Corporations, chap. §16. 16.01, n.3, 1983 & Supp", ~ (1997)
- Potthoff, "Das Aufsichtsratsmitglied, 3. Aufl", ~ (1995)
- R. Passow, "Betrieb, Unternehmung, Konzern", ~ (1925)
- Robert Liefmann, "Beteiligungs-und Finanzierungsgesellschaften" (1923), Verlag von Gustav Fischer
- Scheffler, "Strategieentwicklung und strategisches Controlling fur eine Holding in Recht und Konzern" (1992), Spindler
- Scheffler, "Management-Holding" (1987), DBW
- Scholz, "GmbHG, 8. Aufl", ~ (1993)
- Semler, "Leitung und Uberwachung der Aktiengesellschaft, 2. Aufl", ~ (1996)
- Timm, "Die Aktiengesellschaft als Konzernspitze", ~ (1980)
- Wahlers, "Konzernbildungskontrolle durch die Hamburg ZIP", ~ (1980)
- Wiedemann, "Die Unternehmensgruppe im Privatrecht", ~ (1988)
- Wiesner, "Munchener Handbuch des Gesellschaftsrechts", ~ (1988)
- William H. Painter, "Double Derivative Suits and Other Remedies With Regard to Damaged Subsidiaries", Ind. L. J, 36, pp.143~ (1961)
