결합기업의 회사법상 쟁점에 관한 검토
A Review of Corporate Law Issues on Combined Business Enterprises
0
조회
0
다운로드
17
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Since the holding company system was allowed under the MonopolyRegulation and Fair Trade Act in Korea, Korean business society’s interesttoward the system has increased owing to market’s positive evaluationregarding simple and transparent ownership structure and corporategovernance of the holding company system. As a result, as of the end ofSeptember 2011, the number of holding company filed in Korean Fair TradeCommission was 105, among them the number of general holding companywas 92, and that of financial holding company was 13. In addition, theConglomerate, Chaebol, being formed through cross investment amongparent and subsidiary companies became unique Korean corporate culture. Regarding corporate issues such as right and duty between controllingcompany and subsidiary company, the protection of those companies'minority shareholders and creditors, current corporate law which wasestablished on the assumption of single corporate entity was applied inorder to solve those legal issues. However, these attempts failed owing tothe deficiency in relation to right protection and coordination of conflict ofinterests. This study analyzes legal system of combined business enterprises ofEurope, Germany, United States, and Japan comparatively, and reviewscorporate law issues and legal measures to deal with those issues with respect to combined business enterprises system in Korea. It proposes toadopt the situation based approach, to introduce double derivative actionand the right of access to account books. It also suggests to introduceinternal control system and to codify the article to protect minorityshareholders of controlling company and subsidiary company.
Abstract
Since the holding company system was allowed under the MonopolyRegulation and Fair Trade Act in Korea, Korean business society’s interesttoward the system has increased owing to market’s positive evaluationregarding simple and transparent ownership structure and corporategovernance of the holding company system. As a result, as of the end ofSeptember 2011, the number of holding company filed in Korean Fair TradeCommission was 105, among them the number of general holding companywas 92, and that of financial holding company was 13. In addition, theConglomerate, Chaebol, being formed through cross investment amongparent and subsidiary companies became unique Korean corporate culture. Regarding corporate issues such as right and duty between controllingcompany and subsidiary company, the protection of those companies'minority shareholders and creditors, current corporate law which wasestablished on the assumption of single corporate entity was applied inorder to solve those legal issues. However, these attempts failed owing tothe deficiency in relation to right protection and coordination of conflict ofinterests. This study analyzes legal system of combined business enterprises ofEurope, Germany, United States, and Japan comparatively, and reviewscorporate law issues and legal measures to deal with those issues with respect to combined business enterprises system in Korea. It proposes toadopt the situation based approach, to introduce double derivative actionand the right of access to account books. It also suggests to introduceinternal control system and to codify the article to protect minorityshareholders of controlling company and subsidiary company.
참고문헌 (44)
- 공정거래위원회, "2012년판 공정거래백서" (2012)
- 김건식, "지주회사의 운영과 회사법: 총론적 고찰, In 지주회사와 법" (2005), 도서출판 소화
- 김문재, "지주회사의 도입에 따른 회사법의 향방", 상사법연구, 18(1) (1999)
- 유럽의 기업집단법 현황 및 한국 재벌개혁에의 시사점, "김상조", 민주정책연구원, ~ (2012)
- 김재협, "그룹에 있어 회사재산 남용죄에 관한 프랑스 법원의 태도 - 로젠불름 판결을 중심으로 -", 인권과 정의, (431), pp.118~133 (2013), 대한변호사협회
- 김현태, "자회사에 대한 실효적 지배를 위한 법적 수단, In 지주회사와법" (2005), 도서출판 소화
- 권기범, "제4판 주석 상법(4)" (2003), 한국사법행정학회
- 기업결합에 대한 회사법적 규율의 국제적 동향 및 상법상 도입방안, "송옥렬", 서울대학교 금융법센터, ~ (2012)
- 신현윤, "기업결합법론" (1999), 법문사
- 신현윤, "기업결합에 따른 회사입법의 방향", 상사법연구, 15(1) (1996)
- 안성포, "주주대표소송과 원고적격성", 비교사법, 12(1) (2005)
- 유진희, "콘체른에서 모회사 주주의 보호 독일 연방대법원의 “Holzmüller”판결 (BGHZ 833, 122)을 중심으로", 상사법연구, 11 (1992)
- 유진희, "이중대표소송의 도입에 관한 입법론적 고찰", 상사판례연구, 19(4), pp.121~153 (2006), 한국상사판례학회
- 조지현, "주식콘체른에서 종속회사의 소수주주보호", 상사법연구, 24(1), pp.37~72 (2005), 한국상사법학회
- 조지현, "從屬會社의 少數者保護를 위한 支配企業의 責任", 경영법률, 16(2), pp.289~310 (2006), 한국경영법률학회
- 조지현, "주주유한책임원칙의 제한 -독일법상의 실체파악책임을 중심으로-", 상사법연구, 23(3), pp.297~321 (2004), 한국상사법학회
- 최준선, "이중대표소송제도의 입법론에 대한 검토", 성균관법학, 18(3), pp.433~464 (2006), 법학연구소
- "한국채택국제회계기준 제1110호 연결재무제표(한국회계기준원 회계기준위원회 2012. 10. 19. 개정의결)", ~ (2012)
- 加藤貴仁, "企業結合法制に關する調査硏究報告書" (2010), 商事法務
- 釜田薰子, "アメリカにおける親會社株主保護, In 企業結合法の總合的硏究" (2009), 商事法務
- 森本滋, "企業結合法の總合的硏究" (2009), 商事法務
- 森まどか, "アメリカにおける子會社の少數株主ㆍ債權者保護, In 企業結合法の總合 的硏究" (2009), 商事法務
- 石井裕介, "座談會｢會社法制の見直しに關する要綱｣ の考え方と今後の實務對應", 商事法務, (1978) (2012)
- 船津浩司, "トイツの親會社株主保護, In 企業結合法の總合的硏究" (2009), 商事法務
- "商事法務", 2012, ~
- 前田雅弘, "親會社株主の保護", ジュリスト, (1439) (2012)
- ALI, "Principles of Corporate Governance: Analysis and Recommendations", 1 (1994)
- Douglas G. Baird, "Substantive Consolidation Today", B. C. L. Rev, 47, pp.5~ (2005)
- Hartwin Bungert, "Festschreibung der ungeschriebenen “Holzmüller”- Hauptversamm- lungszuständigkeiten bei der Aktiengesellschaft" (2004), Wulf Goette
- Pierre-Henri Conac, "Constraining Dominant Shareholders’ Self-Dealing: The Legal Framework in France, Germany, and Italy", European Company and Financial Law Review, 4(4) (2007)
- Volker Emmerich, "Aktien- und GmbH-Konzernrecht Kommentar" (2008)
- David B. Feirstein, "Parents and Subsidiaries in Delaware: A Dysfunctional Standard", N.Y.U. J. L. & Bus, 2, pp.479~482 (2006)
- Holger Fleischer, "Ungeschriebene Hauptversammlungszustandigkeiten im Aktienrecht : Von “Holzmüller” zu “Gelatine”", NJW, pp.2339~
- Robert Goddard, "Modernising Company Law’: The Government White Paper", The Modern Law Review, 66(3) (2003)
- Mark M. Graham, "Delaware Post-Merger Derivative Suit Standing and Demand Requirements: Professional Management Associates, Inc. v. Coss", J. Corp. L, 25, pp.631~ (2000)
- Heinsius, "Organzuständigkeit bei Bildung, Erweiterung und Umorganisation des Konzerns", ZGR, 383 (1984)
- Harry G. Henn, "Laws of Corporations and Other Business Enterprises" (1983)
- Matthew A. Kitchen, "The Right of a Parent’s Shareholders to Inspect the Books and Records of Subsidiaries : None of Their Business?", U. Cin. Law. Rev, 74, pp.1089~ (2006)
- Dietmar Kubis, "Münchener Kommentar zum AktG Band 4" (2004)
- Thomas Liebscher, "Ungeschriebene Hauptversammlungszuständigkeiten im Lichte von Holzmüller, Macrotron und Gelatine", ZGR (2005)
- Marc Löbbe, "Corporate Groups: Competence of the Shareholders’ Meeting and Minority Protection the German Federal Court of Justice's Recent Gelatine and Macrotron Cases Redefine the Holzmüller Doctrine", German Law Journal, 5, pp.1057~ (2004)
- "Report of the Reflection Group on the Future of EU Company Law" (2011)[URL]
- Mary Siegel, "The Erosion of the Law of Controlling Shareholder", Del. J. Corp.L, 24, pp.27~ (1999)
- Yaman Shukairy, "Note, Megasubsidiaries and Asset Sales under Section 271: Which Shareholders Must Approve Subsidiary Asset Sales", Mich. L. Rev, 104, pp.1809~ (2006)