2차적저작물로의 변형과 공정이용인 변형의 차이 - 표현형식의 변형과 이용목적의 변형 -
Transformation and Transformative Use of Copyrighted Work -New Mode of Expression and Transformative Purpose-
0
조회
0
다운로드
11
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to find out the test for distinguishing “transformative use” as a fair use of a copyrighted work from mere “transformation” as a preparation for a derivative work of the work. The test for the distinction is necessary because over- or under-interpretation of the terms might be able to make meaningless either fair use or right to prepare a derivative work, which, in turn, might result in breaking the balance between the dissemination and concentration of copyrighted information. This article tries to achieve the goal by analyzing federal supreme court and circuit court cases. One second circuit case, Castle Rock Entertainment v. Carol Publishing Group, mentioned the difference between “transforming an original work into a derivative work” and “using an original work for a transformative purpose.” The court said that mere transformation does not reach transformative use, while transformative use does not require transformation. Thus, mere transformation means altering manners or modes of expression, while transformative use means altering the purpose of the use. This article also proposes another test for distinguishing transformative use from mere transformation for the interpretation of the future fair use provision of Korea Copyright Act. This article proposes that the minimum range of transformative use can be the use of an original work that shows different ideas or feelings from those of the original work.
참고문헌 (23)
- 오승종, "저작권법" (2007), 박영사
- 김원오, "패러디 항변을 둘러싼 저작권법상 쟁점과 과제", 안암법학, (14) (2002), 안암법학회
- 박준우, "공정이용법리의 기원과 의의 - 퍼블릭도메인의 확보를 위한 공정이용규정의 제안 -", 법학논총, 29(2), pp.123~140 (2009), 법학연구소
- 우지숙, "UCC 창작물에 대한 저작권법 적용의 쟁점 및 미국 패러디 관련판례의 시사점: 변형적 이용(transformative use) 개념의 도입을 제안함", 계간 저작권, 21(3), pp.78~102 (2008), 한국저작권위원회
- 이대희, "저작권법상의 공정이용의 법리에 관한 비교법적 연구", 경영법률, 10 (2000), 한국경영법률학회
- 함 석 천, "패러디, 지적재산권과 표현의 자유", 저스티스, (91), pp.63~90 (2006), 한국법학원
- William W. III Fisher, "Reconstructing the Fair Use Doctrine", Harv. L. Rev, 101, pp.1659~ (1988)
- Paul Goldstein, "Fair Use in Context", Colum. J.L. & Arts, 31, pp.433~ (2008)
- Laura A. Heymann, "Everything Is Transformative: Fair Use and Reader Response", Colum. J.L. & Arts, 31, pp.445~ (2008)
- Pierre N. Leval, "Toward a Fair Use Standard", Harv. L. Rev, 103, pp.1105~ (1990)
- Ruth Okediji, "Givers, Takes, and Other Kinds of Users: A Fair Use Doctrine for Cyberspace", Fla. L. Rev, 53, pp.107~ (2001)
- Lydia Pallas Loren, "Redefining the Market Failure Approach to Fair Use in an Era of Copyright Permission Systems", J. Intell. Prop. L, 5, pp.1~ (1997)
- Michael J. Madison, "Rewriting Fair Use and the Future of Copyright Reform", Cardozo Arts & Ent. L.J, 23, pp.391~ (2005)
- R. Anthony Reese, "Transformativeness and the Derivative Work Right", Colum. J.L. & Arts, 31, pp.467~ (2008)
- Stewart E. Sterk, "Rhetoric and Reality in Copyright Law", Mich. L. Rev, 94, pp.1197~ (1996)
- "Symposium: Panel III, Fair Use: Its Application, Limitations and Future", 17 Fordham Intell. Prop. Media & Ent. L.J, pp.1017~ (2007)
- Rebecca Tushnet, "Copy This Essay: How Fair Use Doctrine Harms Free Speech and How Copying Serves It", Yale L.J, 114, pp.535~ (2004)
- Matt Williams, "Recent Second Circuit Opinions Indicate That Google's Library Project is Not Transformative", Cardozo Arts & Ent. L.J, 25, pp.303~ (2007)
- "Campbell v", Acuff-Rose Music, 1164~ (1994), 114 S.Ct
- "Sony Corp. v", Universal City Studios, 774~ (1984), 104 S.Ct
- "Castle Rock Entertainment v", Carol Publishing Group, 132~ (1998), 150 F.3d
- "Twin Peaks Productions", Inc. v. Publications Intern., Ltd, 1366~ (1993), 996 F.2d
- "1993", Inc. v. Kinko’s Graphics Corp, 1522~ (1991), 758 F.Supp