민사소송절차와 파산절차의 관계에 관한 연구
Study on the relationships between civil procedure and bankruptcy procedure
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
A civil lawsuit, while pending before the court, may sometimes be put in a situation when it can no longer proceed legally or factually on account of some circumstances on the part of either the court or the parties. Situation when a litigation procedure can no longer proceed out of a legal reason are called 'stay of proceeding', and are defined specifically by related law. Apart from these, situations when a civil procedure is delayed due to some incidents of the court or the parties not enumerated by law are called 'de facto stay', and should be the distinguished from 'stay of proceedings'. Stay of proceedings cam be divided into two groups: interruption and suspension. The Civil Procedure Act of Korea defines various types of 'interruption' from Section 233 through Section 244, and types of 'suspension' in Section 245 and 246, respectively. The system of interruption and suspension of proceedings, and the method of their clearing-up, especially the design of a 'take over', all of which are codified in the Civil Procedure Act, have close connection with accomplishing the ideals of civil procedure-appropriate, fair, swift and economical progress of civil procedure.
Abstract
A civil lawsuit, while pending before the court, may sometimes be put in a situation when it can no longer proceed legally or factually on account of some circumstances on the part of either the court or the parties. Situation when a litigation procedure can no longer proceed out of a legal reason are called 'stay of proceeding', and are defined specifically by related law. Apart from these, situations when a civil procedure is delayed due to some incidents of the court or the parties not enumerated by law are called 'de facto stay', and should be the distinguished from 'stay of proceedings'. Stay of proceedings cam be divided into two groups: interruption and suspension. The Civil Procedure Act of Korea defines various types of 'interruption' from Section 233 through Section 244, and types of 'suspension' in Section 245 and 246, respectively. The system of interruption and suspension of proceedings, and the method of their clearing-up, especially the design of a 'take over', all of which are codified in the Civil Procedure Act, have close connection with accomplishing the ideals of civil procedure-appropriate, fair, swift and economical progress of civil procedure.
참고문헌 (13)
- 서울중앙지방법원 파산부 실무연구회, "법인파산실무" (2006), 박영사
- 서울중앙지방법원 파산부 실무연구회, "개인회생・파산실무" (2006), 박영사
- 고영한, "재판실무연구(5) 도산관계소송" (2009), 한국사법행정학회
- "법원실무제요 민사집행Ⅰ,Ⅱ,Ⅲ, 법원행정처", ~ (2003)
- 강현중, "민사소송법 제6판" (2004), 박영사
- 이시윤, "신민사소송법 제5판" (2009), 박영사
- 정동윤, "민사소송법 제2판" (2007), 법문사
- 호문혁, "민사소송법, 제3판" (2003), 법문사
- "주석 신민사소송법Ⅲ, 한국사법행정학회", ~ (2004)
- 김경욱, "파산재단에 관한 연구", 비교사법 (2001), 한국비교사법학회
- 정준영, "신도산법의 파산절차가 소송절차에 미치는 영향. in: 재판자료집83" (1999), 법원도서관
- 정갑주, "파산・회생절차가 소송절차에 미치는 영향 개관", 민사법연구 (2006)
- 이원삼, "파산절차에서 담보권에 준하는 가압류에 관한 고찰", 법조, 57(4), pp.47~77 (2008), 법조협회
