독일 보험계약법상 최초보험료의 지급지체에 관한 연구
Legal Effects from Payment Delay of Due Initial Insurance Premium in the German Insurance Contract Law
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Once an insurance contract is concluded between the insurer and the insured, the contract parties, the insured is obligated to pay the insurance premium to the insurer (Clause 638 of the Korean Commercial Code). Unless otherwise agreed upon between the insurance parties, the first premium must be paid before the commencement of the insurer's liability (Clause 656 of the Korean Commercial Code), and accordingly the insured must pay the first installment or all at once of the premium due without delay after the establishment of the insurance contract (Para. 1-1 of Clause 650 of the Korean Commercial Code). Furthermore, even though the insurer is required to issue the insurance policy without delay upon the establishment of the insurance contract, in the absence of payment of the due sum, it does not need to do so (Clause 640 of the Korean Commercial Code). The German Insurance Law, in contrast to its Korean counterpart, stipulates that the issued insurance policy must be received by the insured before the payment of the premium as far as the amount of the premium to be paid, in first installment or all at once, is negotiated and agreed upon (Article 33 of the German Insurance Contract Law). This paper addresses the legal effects surrounding the delay in first premiums payable without delay right after the contract comes into effect rather than the ongoing premiums during the contract period. The Korean Commercial Code (Para. 1-1 of Clause 650) and the German Insurance Contract Law (Article 37) show that they both have in common that the first premium must be paid before the commencement of the insurer's liability. In addition to this commonality, one thing evident is that the German legislators took much consideration of increased protection of the insured's interests and rights when they amended the law in 2008. In particular, the removal of the previous provision involving such a fictitious right of cancellation of the insurance policy, the restrictions on the cancellation right and requirements for indemnification on the part of the insurer, and the saving provision that makes it clear that the insured must be made aware of the legal effects arising from non-payment of due premiums, all refect such intention. This is believed to throw a meaningful implication of how the legal issue relating to the delay in initial premium payment should be approached in efforts to best revise the existing Korean law concerning insurance policies in the future.
Abstract
Once an insurance contract is concluded between the insurer and the insured, the contract parties, the insured is obligated to pay the insurance premium to the insurer (Clause 638 of the Korean Commercial Code). Unless otherwise agreed upon between the insurance parties, the first premium must be paid before the commencement of the insurer's liability (Clause 656 of the Korean Commercial Code), and accordingly the insured must pay the first installment or all at once of the premium due without delay after the establishment of the insurance contract (Para. 1-1 of Clause 650 of the Korean Commercial Code). Furthermore, even though the insurer is required to issue the insurance policy without delay upon the establishment of the insurance contract, in the absence of payment of the due sum, it does not need to do so (Clause 640 of the Korean Commercial Code). The German Insurance Law, in contrast to its Korean counterpart, stipulates that the issued insurance policy must be received by the insured before the payment of the premium as far as the amount of the premium to be paid, in first installment or all at once, is negotiated and agreed upon (Article 33 of the German Insurance Contract Law). This paper addresses the legal effects surrounding the delay in first premiums payable without delay right after the contract comes into effect rather than the ongoing premiums during the contract period. The Korean Commercial Code (Para. 1-1 of Clause 650) and the German Insurance Contract Law (Article 37) show that they both have in common that the first premium must be paid before the commencement of the insurer's liability. In addition to this commonality, one thing evident is that the German legislators took much consideration of increased protection of the insured's interests and rights when they amended the law in 2008. In particular, the removal of the previous provision involving such a fictitious right of cancellation of the insurance policy, the restrictions on the cancellation right and requirements for indemnification on the part of the insurer, and the saving provision that makes it clear that the insured must be made aware of the legal effects arising from non-payment of due premiums, all refect such intention. This is believed to throw a meaningful implication of how the legal issue relating to the delay in initial premium payment should be approached in efforts to best revise the existing Korean law concerning insurance policies in the future.
참고문헌 (22)
- 김은경, "독일보험계약법 개혁과 그 시사점", 상사법연구, 25(4), pp.223~269 (2007), 한국상사법학회
- 양승규, "보험법 제5판" (2004), 삼지원
- 유주선, "계속보험료 지급지체에 대한 법적 효과 - 한국과 독일의 비교법적 관점에서", 법제연구, (38), pp.265~294 (2010), 한국법제연구원
- 이기수, "해상·보험법(상법강의 IV) 제8판" (2008), 박영사
- 이필규, "2009년 독일 보험계약법(VVG)" (2009), 세창출판사
- 정찬형, "상법강의(하) 제12판" (2010), 박영사
- 최기원, "보험법, 제3판" (2002), 박영사
- 최병규, "2007년 독일 보험계약법개정안에 관한 소고 - 통칙부분을 중심으로", 상사판례연구, 20(1), pp.179~208 (2007), 한국상사판례학회
- 최준선, "보험법·해상법 제3판" (2008), 삼영사
- "Berliner Kommentar zum VVG, Kommentar zum deutschen und österreichischen VVG, hrsg. von Honsell", ~ (1999)
- "Bruck Ernst", Möller Hans, Versicherungsvertragsgesetz, Walter de Gruyter&Co, 1954
- "Looschelders Dirk", Pohlmann Petra, Versicherungsvertragsgesetz, Carl Heymanns Verlag, 2010
- "Langheid Theo", Wandt Manfred, Münchener Kommentar zum Versicherung- svertragsgesetz, 2010, C.H.Beck
- "Meixner", Steinbeck, Das neue Versicherungsvertragsrecht, 2008
- "Niederleithinger Ernst, Das neue VVG, Nomos", ~ (2007)
- "Palandt Otto", Heinrichs Helmut, Bürgerliches Gesetz, C.H.Beck, 2010
- "Prölss Jürgen", Martin Anton, Versicherungsvertragsgesetz, Kommentar zu VVG und EGVVG sowie Kommentierung wichtiger Versicherungsbedimgungen -unter Berücksichtigung des ÖVVG und österreichischer Rechtsprechung, 28. Aufl. 28, 2010
- "Römer Wolfgan", Langheid Theo, Versicherungsvertragsgesetz-Mit Pflicht- veresicherungsgesetz(PflVG) und Kraftfahrzeug-Pflichtversicherung- sverordnung (KfzPflVV), Kommentar, 2. Aufl, 2003
- "Rüffer Wilfried", Halbach Dirk, pp.2009, ~
- "Schmikoswski", Höra, Das neue Versicherungsvertragsrecht-Text, Erläuterungen, Arbeitshilfen, Materialen, 2008
- "Terbille Michael, Versicherungsrecht, Münchner Anwalts Handbuch, 2. Aufl", ~ (2008)
- "Wandt Manfred", Ganster Bastian, Zur Harmonisierung von Versicher- ungsbeginn und Prämiefälligkeit durch AVB im Rahmen des VVG 2008, VersR 2007, 1034 ff
