본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

위험증가와 통지의무에 관한 상법 규정의 법적 재검토

Legal Research on the Duty to Notify of the Aggravation of Risk under the Korean Commercial Law

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The Insurer, as well as society at large, has an interest in risk management and loss prevention. Thus it suggests rules that encourage or at least allow some degree of intervention or control by the insurer over the conduct of the policyholder during as well as immediately before a period of insurance cover. Whatever the substance of a special rule for aggravation of risk, the aggravation that triggers it is usually defined. Some legislation speaks simply of a ‘material’ increase but most national legislation goes further. A typical definition is an “increase … such that had the Insurer been aware of the fact or incident, it would not have concluded the insurance contract, or would not have concluded it under the same terms.”The insurer is entitled to reconsider the insurance as and when the insurer becomes aware of aggravation of risk. If an aggravation occurs, the insurer is obliged within one month of becoming aware of it to propose an appropriate ‘modification of the contract.’If the policyholder acquires knowledge that the risk has been increased by a change made or permitted without the insurer's approval, he must inform the insurer. The policyholder is required to notify the insurer ‘without delay.’ The insurer whishes to reassess the ongoing risk as soon as possible but the policyholder may have difficulties in assessing the changed situation and in communicating with the insurer. Notification rules are mostly found in countries where cover is commonly contracted for periods longer than a year and where there is a relationship of trust and mutual commitment between insurer and policyholder. The policyholder is now required to report any changes which affect the accuracy or relevance of his answers to the questions posed by the insurer when the cover was contracted. The rule agreed provides that any policy term on aggravation of risk shall be without effect unless the aggravation of risk to which the term applies is (a) ‘material’ and (b) ‘specified in the contract of insurance.’ Aggravation is material, as it is in the rule of disclosure, if it is of a nature to have an influence on a reasonable insurer's decision whether to enter into the contract at all, or whether to do so under the terms agreed.

Abstract

The Insurer, as well as society at large, has an interest in risk management and loss prevention. Thus it suggests rules that encourage or at least allow some degree of intervention or control by the insurer over the conduct of the policyholder during as well as immediately before a period of insurance cover. Whatever the substance of a special rule for aggravation of risk, the aggravation that triggers it is usually defined. Some legislation speaks simply of a ‘material’ increase but most national legislation goes further. A typical definition is an “increase … such that had the Insurer been aware of the fact or incident, it would not have concluded the insurance contract, or would not have concluded it under the same terms.”The insurer is entitled to reconsider the insurance as and when the insurer becomes aware of aggravation of risk. If an aggravation occurs, the insurer is obliged within one month of becoming aware of it to propose an appropriate ‘modification of the contract.’If the policyholder acquires knowledge that the risk has been increased by a change made or permitted without the insurer's approval, he must inform the insurer. The policyholder is required to notify the insurer ‘without delay.’ The insurer whishes to reassess the ongoing risk as soon as possible but the policyholder may have difficulties in assessing the changed situation and in communicating with the insurer. Notification rules are mostly found in countries where cover is commonly contracted for periods longer than a year and where there is a relationship of trust and mutual commitment between insurer and policyholder. The policyholder is now required to report any changes which affect the accuracy or relevance of his answers to the questions posed by the insurer when the cover was contracted. The rule agreed provides that any policy term on aggravation of risk shall be without effect unless the aggravation of risk to which the term applies is (a) ‘material’ and (b) ‘specified in the contract of insurance.’ Aggravation is material, as it is in the rule of disclosure, if it is of a nature to have an influence on a reasonable insurer's decision whether to enter into the contract at all, or whether to do so under the terms agreed.

참고문헌 (36)

  1. 김성태, "보험법강론" (2001), 법문사
  2. 보험경영연구회, "보험론" (2005), 문영사
  3. 양승규, "보험법" (2005), 삼지원
  4. 이필규, "2009년 독일보험계약법(VVG)" (2009), 세창출판사
  5. 이기수, "보험・해상법" (2008), 박영사
  6. 최기원, "보험법" (2002), 박영사
  7. 최준선, "보험법・해상법" (2008), 삼영사
  8. 김선정, "일본 보험법상 고지의무제도의 개혁", 기업법연구, 22(4), pp.383~407 (2008), 한국기업법학회
  9. 김선정, "상해보험계약의 과도한 누적과 다른 보험계약에 대하여 알릴의무", 상사판례연구, 11 (2000)
  10. 김선정, "보험계약법상 고지의무에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.1992
  11. 김성태, "프랑스 보험계약법상의 고지・통지의무", 경희법학, 21(1) (1986)
  12. 김은경, "독일보험계약법상 위험증가금지의 문제", 비교사법, 16(3), pp.365~388 (2009), 한국비교사법학회
  13. 노일석, "보험계약에 있어서 위험의 변경・증가", 상사법연구, 5 (1987)
  14. 민중기, "대법원판례해설. In: 상법 제652조 제1항 및 화재보험보통약관상의 통지의무의 대상인 ‘사고발생의 위험이 현저하게 변경 또는 증가된 사실’의 의미와 해지권의 소멸" (2001), 법원도서관
  15. 박세민, "중요성 판단의 문제와 해석 - 고지의무제도를 중심으로", 상사법연구, 15(2) (1996)
  16. 이상훈, "보험법의 쟁점. In: 고지의무 위반의 효과" (2000), 법문사
  17. 장덕조, "보험법연구(5). In: 보증보험에서의 고지의무와 기망행위" (2003), 삼지원
  18. 장덕조, "보험법연구 2. In: 고지의무위반의 요건과 효과에 관한 체계적 해석" (1998), 삼지원
  19. 정경영, "일반 손해보험에 대한 보증보험의 특성에 관한 연구", 상사법연구, 29(1), pp.253~282 (2010), 한국상사법학회
  20. 정호열, "고지의무에 관한 고찰", 법학, 40(1) (1999), 서울대 법학연구소
  21. 최병규, "중과실비례보상제도의 도입가능성에 관한 연구", 일감법학, (14) (2008), 건국대 법학연구소
  22. 최준선, "주운전자 고지제도는 과연 필요한가", 인권과 정의, (228) (1995), 대한변호사협회
  23. 한기정, "고지의무의 수동화 - 자발적 고지의무에서 수동적 응답의무로 -", 비교사법, 16(3), pp.325~363 (2009), 한국비교사법학회
  24. 山下友信, "保險法" (2008), 東京 : 有斐閣
  25. 金澤理, "裁判實務大系 26(損害保險訴訟法)" (1996), 東京 : 靑林書院新社
  26. 大森利夫, "損害保險判例百選(別冊ジュリスト)" (1980), 東京 : 有斐閣
  27. 萩本修, "新しい保險法の槪要", 商事法務, (1839) (2008)
  28. 木下孝治, "告知義務・危險增加", ジュリスト, (1364) (2008)
  29. 山下友信, "江頭憲治郞先生還曆記念 企業法の理論(下卷). In: 告知義務・通知義務に關する立法論的課題の檢討" (2007), 商事法務
  30. 山下友信, "傷害保險契約と他保險契約の告知義務・通知義務", 文硏論集, (100) (1992), 生命保險文化硏究所
  31. 坂口光男, "保險契約法における危險の增加", 損害保險, 35(4) (1973)
  32. Birds, John, "Modern Insurance Law, 4th ed" (1997), London : Sweet & Maxwell
  33. Clarke, Malcolm A, "The Law of Insurance Contracts, 2nd ed" (1994), Lloyd's of London Press
  34. MacGillivray, "Insurance Law, 7th ed" (1981), London : Sweet & Maxwell
  35. Martin, "Versicherungsvertragsgesetz, 22. Aufl" (1980), München : C.H.Beck'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung
  36. Clarke, Malcolm, "Lloyd's Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly, Part Ⅰ. In: Aggravation of risk during the insurance period" (2003)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (22건)