위험변경증가 통지의무 위반에 관한 해석상의 문제와 계약해지권 - 대법원 2011. 7. 28. 선고 2011다23743,23750 판결 -
Notice on Alteration or Increase of Risks and Termination of Contract
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
According to the art. 652 of the Korean Commercial Code, when the policyholder or the insured becomes aware of the fact that the possibility of the occurrence of the insured events has been substantially altered or increased during the cover period, he shall give notice thereof to the insurer without delay; If he has neglected to do so, the insurer may terminate the contract within one month after it becomes aware of the fact. And the article 653 provides that when the risks has been substantially altered or increased by intention or gross negligence of the policyholder and etc., the insurer may request an increase in the premium or terminate the contract within one month. General insurance clauses has the similar provisions about the notice of the increase of risks and the termination of contract. Recently, the Supreme Court has decided about the alteration or increase of risks. Especially it is worthy of note in manifesting the starting point of one month, namely, the exclusion period within which the insurer may terminate the contract. After examining and analyzing the provisions about the alteration or increase of risks, this paper will especially review the precedent of the Supreme Court about the starting point of the period. Finally, it will be suggested that the provisions about the alteration or increase of risks will be revised.
Abstract
According to the art. 652 of the Korean Commercial Code, when the policyholder or the insured becomes aware of the fact that the possibility of the occurrence of the insured events has been substantially altered or increased during the cover period, he shall give notice thereof to the insurer without delay; If he has neglected to do so, the insurer may terminate the contract within one month after it becomes aware of the fact. And the article 653 provides that when the risks has been substantially altered or increased by intention or gross negligence of the policyholder and etc., the insurer may request an increase in the premium or terminate the contract within one month. General insurance clauses has the similar provisions about the notice of the increase of risks and the termination of contract. Recently, the Supreme Court has decided about the alteration or increase of risks. Especially it is worthy of note in manifesting the starting point of one month, namely, the exclusion period within which the insurer may terminate the contract. After examining and analyzing the provisions about the alteration or increase of risks, this paper will especially review the precedent of the Supreme Court about the starting point of the period. Finally, it will be suggested that the provisions about the alteration or increase of risks will be revised.
참고문헌 (33)
- 김성태, "보험법강론" (2001), 법문사
- 박세민, "보험법" (2011), 박영사
- 박세민, "자동차보험법론" (2003), 세창출판사
- 양승규, "보험법(제5판)" (2004), 삼지원
- 양승규, "보험법의 쟁점" (2000), 법문사
- 이기수, "보험법·해상법(제8판)" (2008), 박영사
- 이필규, "2009년 독일 보험계약법(VVG)" (2009), 세창출판사
- 임용수, "보험법" (2006), 법률정보센터
- 장덕조, "보험법" (2011), 법문사
- 정찬형, "상법강의(하)(제14판)" (2012), 박영사
- 채이식, "개정판 상법강의(하)" (2003), 박영사
- 최준선, "보험법 해상법 항공운송법" (2012), 삼영사
- 한창희, "보험법" (2011), 국민대학교 출판부
- 김종윤, "타 보험 가입사실의 고지의무와 통지의무의 위반효과", 보험법연구, 4 (2002), 삼지원
- 양석완, "보험계약에 있어서 위험의 변경·증가에 관한 법적 쟁점", 상사법연구, 30(2), pp.677~714 (2011), 한국상사법학회
- 양승규, "위험증가통지 의무위반과 보험자의 계약해지", 손해보험, 통권 : 520 (2012), 손해보험협회
- 양승규, "위험변경증가 통지의무위반의 효과", 손해보험, 통권 : 289 (1992), 손해보험협회
- 장경환, "손해보험에서의 다수계약통지의무", 보험학회지, (75), pp.93~134 (2006), 한국보험학회
- 장덕조, "보통보험약관의 구속력-대판 1998.11.27. 98다32564", 보험법연구, 3 (1999)
- 정경영, "다른 생명보험계약 체결사실에 관한 보험계약자의 통지의무", 보험법연구, 5 (2003), 삼지원
- 주기동, "상법상 통지의무와 보험약관상 통지의무", 민사재판의 제문제, 12 (2003), 민사실무연구회
- 최한준, "위험증가규정의 적용범위", 보험학회지, (52) (1998), 한국보험학회
- 한창희, "위험변경증가에 대한 통지의무의 위반과 보험자의 책임, In 상사판례연구Ⅳ" (2000), 박영사
- 岡田豊基, "現代保險法" (2010), 中央經濟社
- 金子曉實, "火災保險普通約款論" (1998), 成文堂
- 東京海上日動火災保險株式會社, "損害保險の法務と實務" (2010), 金融財政事情硏究會
- 大串淳子, "解說保險法" (2008), 弘文堂
- 福田弥夫, "逐條解說 改正保險法" (2009), ぎようせい
- 樓井健夫, "保險法ハンドブック" (2009), 日本評論社
- 石山卓磨, (2011), 成文堂
- 坂口光南, "保險法" (1991), 文眞堂
- 小林量, "解除權の除斥期間の起算點, In 保險法判例百選" (2010), 有斐閣
- 坂口光南, "通知義務, In 自動車保險の法律問題" (1993), 經濟法令硏究會
