본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

지배주주의 주식매도청구권의 운용과 관련된 몇 가지 제언

A Few Propositions on the Squeeze out under the Section 360-24 of the Revised Commercial Code

0

조회

0

다운로드

18

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

The New Commercial Code revised currently introduces the Squeeze out. Such introduction stems from the idea that it has many positive aspects. It is a currently international trend as well. Under the Section 360-24 of the Code, the controlling shareholders who have acquired more than 95 percent of the company can get the rest of the shares from the minority shareholders. The Code provides some method to protect such minority shareholders who are squeezed out. The main scheme for such protection is purchase price. However, given that there are many theoretical issues unsolved surrounding the fair price of the share at a squeeze out and there are not a few technical difficulties in calculating the share price, this scheme is not an enough protection for them. Thus, I believe there must be more procedural protection devices. Sufficient information should be provided to the minority shareholders so that they could consider it to bargain the price. As for the information that must be disclosed to them, we can refer to the items in the SEC Rule 13e-3 and the schedule thereto. For more fundamental protection of such shareholders' right, a controlling shareholder's fiduciary duty should be introduced. With this basic idea towards this new system, I suggest some idea in interpreting and operating the law. With respect to the appointment of an appraiser, independence must be secured. The company shall support the expenditure for the appointment of the minority shareholders' appraiser. The shareholders' meeting should be the method for the disclosure to the minority shareholders. The introduction of squeeze out suggests a great importance of minority protection. Only with such protection, this new system can be operated in a valanced way. It the real way of conformity to the global standard.

Abstract

The New Commercial Code revised currently introduces the Squeeze out. Such introduction stems from the idea that it has many positive aspects. It is a currently international trend as well. Under the Section 360-24 of the Code, the controlling shareholders who have acquired more than 95 percent of the company can get the rest of the shares from the minority shareholders. The Code provides some method to protect such minority shareholders who are squeezed out. The main scheme for such protection is purchase price. However, given that there are many theoretical issues unsolved surrounding the fair price of the share at a squeeze out and there are not a few technical difficulties in calculating the share price, this scheme is not an enough protection for them. Thus, I believe there must be more procedural protection devices. Sufficient information should be provided to the minority shareholders so that they could consider it to bargain the price. As for the information that must be disclosed to them, we can refer to the items in the SEC Rule 13e-3 and the schedule thereto. For more fundamental protection of such shareholders' right, a controlling shareholder's fiduciary duty should be introduced. With this basic idea towards this new system, I suggest some idea in interpreting and operating the law. With respect to the appointment of an appraiser, independence must be secured. The company shall support the expenditure for the appointment of the minority shareholders' appraiser. The shareholders' meeting should be the method for the disclosure to the minority shareholders. The introduction of squeeze out suggests a great importance of minority protection. Only with such protection, this new system can be operated in a valanced way. It the real way of conformity to the global standard.

참고문헌 (18)

  1. 최병규, "회사법" (2011), 박영사
  2. 김건식, "소수주주의 보호와 지배주주의 성실의무-독일법을 중심으로", 서울대학교 법학, 32(3) (1991), 서울대학교 법학연구소
  3. 김화진, "소수주식의 강제매수제도", 서울대학교 법학, 50(1), pp.321~350 (2009), 법학연구소
  4. 김효신, "소수주주축출제도의 도입방안에 대한 검토", 선진상사법률연구, (50)통권 : 50, pp.40~58 (2010), 법무부
  5. 노혁준, "소수주주 축출제도의 도입에 관한 연구 - 도입형태와 가격산정을 중심으로-", 상사법연구, 26(4), pp.231~271 (2008), 한국상사법학회
  6. 서완석, "지배주주와 주주유한책임원칙", 상사법연구, 23(3), pp.407~462 (2004), 한국상사법학회
  7. 송인방, "지배주주의 행위기준", 법학연구, (21), pp.167~190 (2006), 한국법학회
  8. 송종준, "소수주주 강제퇴출법제의 국제적 신조류와 그 입법론적 수용 가능성 -미국,영국,독일법의 비교분석을 중심으로-", 증권법연구, 6(1), pp.1~38 (2005), 한국증권법학회
  9. 송호신, "지배주주의 권리와 책임", 한양법학, (23), pp.251~286 (2008), 한양법학회
  10. 송호신, "지배주주의 충실의무에 대한 비교연혁법적 고찰", 법학연구, 18(1), pp.329~365 (2010), 법학연구소
  11. 최병규, "2002년 개정 독일 주식법상 Squeeze-Out 규정에 대한 연구", 한국증권법학회 제78회 정기세미나 (2002), 한국증권법학회
  12. Andrew D. Shaffer, "Corporate Fiduciary Inslovent,In The Fiduciary Relation ship Your Corporate Law Professor (Should Have) Warned You about", Am. Bankr. Inst, L. Rev, 8, pp.482~ (2000)
  13. Eberhard Vetter, "Squeeze out Der Ausschluss der Minderheitsaktionäre aus der Aktiengesellshaft nach den", Die Aktigngesellschaft, pp.176~ (2002)
  14. Christopher A. Iacono, "Tender Offers and Short form Mergers by Controlling shareholders under Delaware Law: The 800 Pound Gorilla Continues Unimpeded in Re Pure Resources", Del. J. Corp. L, pp.645~
  15. Ronal J, "Gilson and Bernard S. Black, The Law and Finance of Corporate Acquisitions" (1995), Foundation
  16. Michael C. Jensen, "Theory of the Firm,In Managerial Behaviour, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure", J. Fin. Econ, 3, pp.305~ (1976)
  17. Michael J, "McGuinness and Timo Going Private ransactions,In A Practitioner's Guide", J. Corp. L, pp.437~ (2005)
  18. "SEC's Explanation of Rule 13e-3 and Schedule 13E-3", Securities Exchange Act Release, (16), pp.975~

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (19건)