인간의 권리와 국민의 권리 — 한나 아렌트의 인권 이해를 중심으로 —
Human Rights and Constitutional Rights – Regarding to Hannah Arendt's Discourse –
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper reconsiders the relationship between human rights and fundamental rights with reference to Hannah Arendt. Human rights allegedly is natural and universal rights whose idea forms the classical doctrine of the constitutional law, whereas constitutional rights is positive and institutionalized rights. The relationship between two rights, however, remains indefinite. This paper examines three forms of constitutional argumentations about this relationship: the natural rights and positive rights, moral rights and legal rights, human rights and constitutional rights. These argumentations cannot offer the firm foundation to determine that relationship. Hannah Arendt provides radical perspectives to reexamine the schema of human rights as well as constitutional rights. She carries a critique of metaphysical theories of human rights, and reverses the notion of natural human rights. According to her discourse, constitutional rights is not based on human rights, and there are no humans without the institution of the community. The destruction of constitutional rights necessarily leads to the destruction of human rights and of humans. This approach has two implications to the theory of constitutional law. The one is the problem of the constitutional subject, and the other is the problem of the constant reconstruction of constitutional institutions. The key is not to choose between the human right and the constitutional right, but to reconstruct the constitutional subject and institution.
Abstract
This paper reconsiders the relationship between human rights and fundamental rights with reference to Hannah Arendt. Human rights allegedly is natural and universal rights whose idea forms the classical doctrine of the constitutional law, whereas constitutional rights is positive and institutionalized rights. The relationship between two rights, however, remains indefinite. This paper examines three forms of constitutional argumentations about this relationship: the natural rights and positive rights, moral rights and legal rights, human rights and constitutional rights. These argumentations cannot offer the firm foundation to determine that relationship. Hannah Arendt provides radical perspectives to reexamine the schema of human rights as well as constitutional rights. She carries a critique of metaphysical theories of human rights, and reverses the notion of natural human rights. According to her discourse, constitutional rights is not based on human rights, and there are no humans without the institution of the community. The destruction of constitutional rights necessarily leads to the destruction of human rights and of humans. This approach has two implications to the theory of constitutional law. The one is the problem of the constitutional subject, and the other is the problem of the constant reconstruction of constitutional institutions. The key is not to choose between the human right and the constitutional right, but to reconstruct the constitutional subject and institution.
참고문헌 (35)
- 김도균, "권리의 문법" (2008), 박영사
- 김비환, "축복과 저주의 정치사상: 20세기와 한나 아렌트" (2001), 한길사
- 김선욱, "정치와 진리" (2001), 책세상
- 유승익, "형량이론과 기본권논증 : 원칙이론의 형량개념에 대한 비판", 박사, pp.2011
- 이국운, "헌법" (2010), 책세상
- 이준일, "법학입문" (2004), 博英社
- 지승원, "의미를 추구하는 인간 법률인" (2007), 이문출판사
- 홍성방, "기본권의 개념과 분류", 사회과학연구, 7, pp.159~183 (1998)
- 스기하라 야스오, "인권의 역사" (1995), 한울
- 박달현, "법적 논증 이론: 법적 근거제시 이론으로서의 합리적 논증대화 이론" (2007), 고려대학교출판부
- 이준일, "법의 개념과 효력 (증보판)" (2007), 고려대학교출판부
- 김준수, "인간의 조건과 실천철학" (1996), 한양대학교 출판원
- 한나 아렌트, "칸트 정치철학 강의" (2002), 푸른숲
- 한나 아렌트, "혁명론" (2004), 한길사
- 김선욱, "예루살렘의 아이히만" (2006), 한길사
- 한나 아렌트, "전체주의의 기원1" (2006), 한길사
- 한나 아렌트, "전체주의의 기원2" (2006), 한길사
- 김선욱, "공화국의 위기" (2011), 한길사
- 아리스토텔레스, "정치학" (2009), 도서출판 숲
- 이상훈, "타자의 권리" (2008), 철학과현실사
- 김선욱, "한나 아렌트와 유대인 문제" (2009), 아모르문디
- 김효전, "헌법과 민주주의" (2003), 法文社
- 에드먼드 버크, "프랑스혁명에 관한 성찰" (2008), 한길사
- 마르틴 크릴레, "민주적 헌정국가의 역사적 전개" (1983), 종로서적
- 헤로도토스, "역사" (2009), 도서출판 숲
- 에릭 홉스봄, "1780년 이후의 민족과 민족주의" (1994), 창비
- R. Alexy, "Die Institutionalisierung der Menschenrechte im demokratischen Verfassungsstaat, In Philosophie der Menschenrechte, 2. Aufl", pp.244~264 (1999), Suhrkamp
- R. Alexy, "The Special Case Thesis", Ratio Juris, 12, pp.374~384 (1999)
- E. Balibar, "(De)Constructing the Human as Human Institution: A Reflection on the Coherence of Hannah Arendt’s Practical Philosophy", Social Research, 74(3), pp.727~738 (2007)
- P. Birmingham, "Hannah Arendt and Human Rights: The Predicament of Common Responsibility" (2006)
- S. Heuser, "Is There a Right to Have Rights? The Case of the Right of Asylum", Ethic Theory Moral Prac, 11, pp.3~11 (2008)
- C. Menke, "The “Aporias of Human Rights” and the “One Human Right”: Regarding the Coherence of Hannah Arendt’s Argument", Social Research, 74(3), pp.739~762 (2007)
- A. Ophir, "Between Eichmann and Kant: Thinking on Evil after Arendt", History and Memory, 8(2), pp.89~136 (1996)
- S. Parekh, "Hannah Arendt and the Challenge of Modernity: A Pheno- menology of Human Rights" (2008), Routledge
- G. Pavlakos, "The Special Case Thesis: An Assessment of R. Alexy’s Discursive Theory of Law", Ratio Juris, 11, pp.126~154 (1998)