청소년 자살 예방개입 프로그램의 효과에 관한 메타분석: 1, 2, 3차 예방개입에 따른 분석
A meta-analysis of the effects of suicide preventive interventions for adolescents: Analyses depending on primary, secondary, and tertiary preventive approaches
2
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to shed light on the efficacy of various suicide preventive interventions for adolescents using meta-analysis. Specifically, this study aims to examine the effects of primary (1st prevention), secondary (2nd prevention), and tertiary (3rd prevention) suicide preventive interventions on direct suicidal and suicide-related outcomes (risk factors and protectors for suicide) and further identify which types of intervention show a high effect under the context of the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd preventions. Suicidal ideation and impulse were included in the suicidal index, depression and negative automatic thoughts in the risk factor index, and self-esteem, problem-solving skills, and life-respecting attitude in the protector index. Thirty-seven suicide studies (one outlier study was excluded) published between 1991 and 2020 were meta-analyzed. Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (CMA) 3.0 software was used for the meta-analysis. The results are as follows. The average effect size of suicide preventive interventions for adolescents is 0.74. Average effect sizes of the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd preventions were 0.44, 1.07, and 1.24, respectively, revealing better effects in the 2nd and the 3rd preventions than in the 1st prevention. The similarly better effects of the 2nd and the 3rd preventions than the 1st prevention were found for the indices of suicide, risk factor, and protector. Under the context of the 1st prevention, the program promoting respect for life and smile treatment showed relatively better effects as compared to Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT) and the preventive education group. Under the context of the 2nd prevention, CBT, mindfulness+ACT, reality therapy, narrative therapy, and art therapy showed large effects on suicide and the suicide-related indices. Under the context of the 3rd prevention, only CBT was applied and showed large effects on suicide and the suicide-related indices. Clinical implications of these findings were discussed.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to shed light on the efficacy of various suicide preventive interventions for adolescents using meta-analysis. Specifically, this study aims to examine the effects of primary (1st prevention), secondary (2nd prevention), and tertiary (3rd prevention) suicide preventive interventions on direct suicidal and suicide-related outcomes (risk factors and protectors for suicide) and further identify which types of intervention show a high effect under the context of the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd preventions. Suicidal ideation and impulse were included in the suicidal index, depression and negative automatic thoughts in the risk factor index, and self-esteem, problem-solving skills, and life-respecting attitude in the protector index. Thirty-seven suicide studies (one outlier study was excluded) published between 1991 and 2020 were meta-analyzed. Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (CMA) 3.0 software was used for the meta-analysis. The results are as follows. The average effect size of suicide preventive interventions for adolescents is 0.74. Average effect sizes of the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd preventions were 0.44, 1.07, and 1.24, respectively, revealing better effects in the 2nd and the 3rd preventions than in the 1st prevention. The similarly better effects of the 2nd and the 3rd preventions than the 1st prevention were found for the indices of suicide, risk factor, and protector. Under the context of the 1st prevention, the program promoting respect for life and smile treatment showed relatively better effects as compared to Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT) and the preventive education group. Under the context of the 2nd prevention, CBT, mindfulness+ACT, reality therapy, narrative therapy, and art therapy showed large effects on suicide and the suicide-related indices. Under the context of the 3rd prevention, only CBT was applied and showed large effects on suicide and the suicide-related indices. Clinical implications of these findings were discussed.
참고문헌 (39)
- 강현, "메타분석에서 통계학적 고려사항들", Hanyang Medical Reviews, 35(1), pp.23~32 (2015), 한양대학교 의과대학[DOI]
- 길혜선, "생명존중교육 프로그램이 고등학생의 생명존중의식, 자아존중감 및 공격성에 미치는 효과", 석사, pp.2013
- 김민선, "자살위험군 청소년을 위한 자살예방프로그램 효과에 대한 메타분석", 한국범죄학, 12(3), pp.107~121 (2018), 대한범죄학회
- 김사라형선, "청소년의 우울․자살생각․스트레스 감소를 위한 통합적 집단상담 프로그램의 개발과 효과", 아동학회지, 32(6), pp.81~94 (2011), 한국아동학회
- 김정애, "지역사회 노인의 정신건강 향상을 위한 웃음치료 프로그램의 효과연구", 한국가족복지학, 17(1), pp.85~104 (2012), 한국아동가족복지학회
- 박석원, "청소년 자살예방 게이트키퍼 교육 프로그램의 개발 및 효과", 청소년복지연구, 22(2), pp.115~137 (2020), 한국청소년복지학회[DOI]
- 박선희, "청소년 자살행위 실태와 관련 요인" (2015), 집문당
- 박소연, "자살을 생각해 본 청소년의 자살시도 경로 분석: 중학생과 고등학생의 비교", 한국웰니스학회지, 13(3), pp.1~15 (2018), 한국웰니스학회[DOI]
- 박현숙, "청소년을 위한 통합적 자살∙폭력 예방 프로그램의 개발", Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 38(4), pp.513~521 (2008), 한국간호과학회
- 송미경, "생명존중교육프로그램이 중학생의 생명존중의식과 생명존중태도에 미치는 영향", 한국학교·지역보건교육학회지, 15(1), pp.105~119 (2014), 한국학교·지역보건교육학회
- 심민정, "생명 존중 프로그램이 학교 적응곤란 중학생의 생명존중 의식과 자살태도에 미치는 영향", 석사, 간호과학, pp.2007
- 이도영, "웃음치료프로그램이 청소년의 우울, 자살생각 및 적응유연성에 미치는 효과", 한국웰니스학회지, 10(2), pp.137~146 (2015), 한국웰니스학회
- 이순영, "분노조절 프로그램이 자살시도 유경험 중학생의 분노, 자살생각 및 학교생활적응에 미치는 효과", 교육치료연구, 6(1), pp.23~42 (2014), 한국교육치료학회
- 이시형, "청소년 생명존중의식에 관한 연구" (2004), 삼성사회정신건강연구소
- 이정은, "자살 게이트키퍼 프로그램의 효과에 대한 메타분석", 학습자중심교과교육연구, 20(24), pp.785~803 (2020), 학습자중심교과교육학회[DOI]
- 전혜숙, "청소년 자살예방 프로그램 효과성에 관한 메타분석: 중ㆍ고등학생을 중심으로", 정신건강과 사회복지, 45(3), pp.92~121 (2017), 한국정신건강사회복지학회[DOI]
- 중앙자살예방센터, "자살예방백서" (2020), 중앙자살예방센터
- 최미희, "청소년 자살 사후 학교중심 위기개입 프로그램에 대한 평가연구", 한국사회복지학, 66(1), pp.5~34 (2014), 한국사회복지학회[DOI]
- 통계청, "청소년 통계", 통계청, ~ (2019)
- 함경애, "청소년의 자살행동 개입 프로그램 개발 및 효과", 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 26(3), pp.573~596 (2014), 한국상담심리학회
- 황성동, "메타분석 : Forest plot에서 네크워크 메타분석까지" (2018), 한나래 아카데미
- Beck, J. S., "Cognitive behavior therapy: Basics and beyond" (2000), Guilford Press
- Bennett, M. P., "Humor and laughter may influence health. I. History and background", Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 3, pp.61~63 (2006)
- Cohen, J., "Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences" (1988), Erlbaum
- Glasser, W., "Reality therapy in action" (2000), Harper Collins Publishers
- Gould, M. S., "Youth suicide prevention", Suicide Life Threat Behavior, 31, pp.6~31 (2001)
- Hayashi, T., "Laughter up-regulates the genes related to NK cell activity in diabetes", Biomedical Research, 28, pp.281~285 (2007)
- Hedges, L., "Statistical methods for meta-analysis" (1985), Academic Press
- Higgins, J. P., "Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions Vol. 4" (2011), John Wiley and Sons
- Littell, J. H., "Systematic reviews and meta-analysis" (2009), Oxford University Press
- Maltsberger, J. T., "Psychotherapy with older suicidal patients", Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 24, pp.217~234 (1991)
- Maris, R. W., "Suicide", The Lancet, 360, pp.319~326 (2002)
- Mrazek, P. J., "Reducing risks for mental disorders: Frontiers for preventive intervention research" (1994), National Academy Press
- Ougrin, D., "Therapeutic Interventions for suicide attempts and self-harm in adolescents : systematic review and meta-analysis", Journal of American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 54, pp.97~107 (2015)
- Pistone, I., "The effects of educational interventions on suicide : A systematic review and meta-analysis", Interventional Journal of Social Psychiatry, 65, pp.399~412 (2019)
- Sutton, A. J., "Empirical assessment of effect of publication bias on meta-analyses", British Medical Journal, 320, pp.1574~1577 (2000)
- Tomkins, T. L., "Does a gatekeeper suicide prevention program work in a school setting? Evaluating training outcome and moderators of effectiveness", Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 40, pp.506~515 (2010)
- Waldvogel, J. L., "Adolescent suicide : Risk factors and prevention strategies", Current Problems in Pediatric and Adolescent Health Care, 38, pp.110~125 (2008)
- Weisz, J. R., "Evidence-based psychotherapies for children and adolescents" (2017), Guilford Press