본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

저작인격권에 대한 비교법 고찰

A Comparative Study of Moral Rights

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

While studying background, characteristics – especially as one right of personality, concrete types of moral rights, this author has examined domestic and international copyright law of the moral rights in this article. In addition, this author has considered its possible role of moral rights in digital era. Moral rights have been estimated as the legacy of Civil Law countries. This viewpoint is assured by the fact that moral rights have had quite a broad protection in Civil Law jurisdictions. On the other hand, the non-economic rights have relatively been protected under the minimal criteria in Common Law countries. Probably this distinction has come from the fundamental differences of cultures and perspectives concerning the moral rights. Therefore, without having a mutual understanding to these different philosophies, two legal systems may be unable to achieve any agreement regarding these rights. Furthermore, it could be huge obstacles for international intellectual property harmonization. Considering the apprehension of Common Law countries as to the moral rights, their concerns might be that some Civil Law countries do not permit the waiver of the moral rights and therefore in cases the abuse of the moral rights may occur as well. In this respect, building reasonable guidelines, there should be protection of authors in the perspective, in which authors are as same as their created works. These guiding principles may be given by legislations – domestic and international levels, but accumulations of a number of judgments of courts might provide the concrete spheres of moral rights.

Abstract

While studying background, characteristics – especially as one right of personality, concrete types of moral rights, this author has examined domestic and international copyright law of the moral rights in this article. In addition, this author has considered its possible role of moral rights in digital era. Moral rights have been estimated as the legacy of Civil Law countries. This viewpoint is assured by the fact that moral rights have had quite a broad protection in Civil Law jurisdictions. On the other hand, the non-economic rights have relatively been protected under the minimal criteria in Common Law countries. Probably this distinction has come from the fundamental differences of cultures and perspectives concerning the moral rights. Therefore, without having a mutual understanding to these different philosophies, two legal systems may be unable to achieve any agreement regarding these rights. Furthermore, it could be huge obstacles for international intellectual property harmonization. Considering the apprehension of Common Law countries as to the moral rights, their concerns might be that some Civil Law countries do not permit the waiver of the moral rights and therefore in cases the abuse of the moral rights may occur as well. In this respect, building reasonable guidelines, there should be protection of authors in the perspective, in which authors are as same as their created works. These guiding principles may be given by legislations – domestic and international levels, but accumulations of a number of judgments of courts might provide the concrete spheres of moral rights.

참고문헌 (47)

  1. 고명식, "우리나라 저작권법상 저작인격권의 보호", 국제지역연구, 2(1) (1998)
  2. 배대헌, "현행 저작권법상 저작인격권의 법리에 관한 검토", 산업재산권, (21) (2006)
  3. 박성호, "저작권법의 이론과 현실 - 정보공유와 인권을 위한 모색" (2006), 현암사
  4. 법무부, "민법 (재산편) 개정 자료집", ~ (2004)
  5. 서달주, "2002 독일 개정저작권법과 저작자의 지위강화" (2003), 저작권심의조정위원회
  6. 윤춘섭, "건축관련 저작인격권 중 동일성유지권에 관한 연구", 대한건축학회논문집 - 계획계, 20(10) (2004)
  7. 이기수, "지적재산권법" (1996), 한칩지적소유권센터
  8. 이해완, "저작권법" (2007), 박영사
  9. 정상조, "지적재산권법" (2004), 박영사
  10. 조규창, "로마법" (1996), 법문사
  11. 조규창, "비교법(상)" (2005), 소화
  12. 황적인, "저작권법" (1988), 법문사
  13. Adolf Dietz, "The Moral Right of the Author ? Moral Rights and the Civil Law Countries", Colum. VLA J.L. & Arts, 19, pp.199~ (1995)
  14. Burton Ong, "Why Moral Rights Matter ? Recognizing the Intrinsic Value of Integrity Rights", Colum. J.L. & Arts, 26, pp.297~ (2003)
  15. Cyrill P. Rigamonti, "The Conceptual Transformation of Moral Rights", Am. J. Comp. L, 55, pp.67~ (2007)
  16. Dan Johnston, "Design Protection - A Practical Guide to the Law on Plagiarism for Manufacturers and Designers" (1995), The Design Council
  17. Elizaeth Adeney, "The Moral Rights of Authors and Performers - An International and Comparative Analysis" (2006), Oxford University Press
  18. Eric H. Reiter, "Personality and Patrimony: Comparative Perspectives on the Right to One’s Image", Tulane L. Rev, 76, pp.677~ (2002)
  19. Eric Marcus, "The Moral Right of the Artist in Germany", Copyright L. Symp, 25, pp.93~ (1980)
  20. Fritz Schuz, "Principles of Roman Law" (1956), Clarendon Press
  21. La Responsabilite : conditions), "Trait?de Droit Civil (Les Obligations", pp.1982, Genevi?e Viney
  22. Gerald Dworkin, "The Moral Rights of the Author ? Moral Rights and the Common Law Countries", Colum. VLA J. L. & Arts, 19, pp.229~ (1995)
  23. Gerald Spindler, "E-Commerce Law in Europe and the USA" (2002), Springer
  24. Hessel E. Vntema, "Roman Law and Its Influence on Western Civilization", Cornell L. Q.uarterly, 35, pp.78~ (1949)
  25. Ian Eagles, "Technological Creativity and Moral Rights ? A Comparative Perspective", Int’l J.L. & Info. Tech, 12, pp.209~ (2004)
  26. Ilhyung Lee, "Toward An American Moral Rights in Copyright", Wash. & Lee L. Rev, 58, pp.795~ (2001)
  27. Ira Singer, "Morality and Identity in Concise Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy", ~ (2000)
  28. J.A.L. Sterling, "World Copyright Law" (2003), Sweet & Maxwell
  29. James L. Gibson, "The Legal Cultures of Europe", Law & Soc’y Rev, 30, pp.55~ (1996)
  30. James Q. Whitman, "The Two Western Cultures of Privacy: Dignity versus Liberty", Yale L.J, 113, pp.1171~ (2004)
  31. Ko Se-il, "Non-Economic Damages in Breach of Contract Cases - Comparative Analysis of Korea, Germany, France, and the United States", 재산법연구, 24(2) (2007)
  32. K. Zwiegert, "An Introduction to Comparative Law" (1992), Clarendon
  33. Lior Zemer, "The Idea of Authorship in Copyright" (2007), Ashgate
  34. Louise Nemschoff, "A Rose by Any Other Name: The U.S. and Moral Rights, in Moral Rights 165", 1995
  35. Matt Jackson, "Harmony or Discord? The Pressure Toward Conformity in International Copyright", IDEA, 43, pp.607~ (2003)
  36. Michael F. Brown, "Who Owns Native Culture?" (2003), Harvard University Press
  37. Mira T. Sundara Rajan, "Moral Rights in Information Technology ? A New Kind of ‘Personal Right’?", Int’l J.L. & Info. Tech, 12, pp.32~ (2004)
  38. Oliver Wendell Homes Jr., "The Path of the Law", Harv. L. Rev, 10, pp.457~ (1897)
  39. Paul Goldstein, "International Copyright ? Principles, Law, and Practice" (2001), Oxford Univ. Press
  40. Peter Drahos, "Global Intellectual Property Rights - Knowledge, Access and Development (Oxfam 2002)" (2002), Oxfam
  41. Philip Vineyard, "No One Expects the Spanish Inquisition - Twice: Subduing the Moral Rights Monster", Tul. J. Tech. & Intell. Prop, 6, pp.223~ (2004)
  42. Phyllis Amarnick, "American Recognition of the Moral Rights : Issues and Options", Copyright L. Symp, 29(31) (1983)
  43. Raymond Sarraute, "Current Theory on the Moral Right of Authors and Artists under French Law", Am. J. Comp. L, 16, pp.465~ (1968)
  44. Richard Watt, "Copyright and Economic Theory - Frieds or Foes?" (2000), Edward Elgar
  45. Samuel D. Warren, "The Right to Privacy", Harvard L. Rev, 5, pp.193~ (1890)
  46. Schonfelder, "Deutsche Gesetze Textsammuling" (2004), C.H. Beck
  47. Severine Dusollier, "Some Reflections on Copyright Management Information and Moral Rights", Colum. J.L. & Arts, 25, pp.377~ (2003)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (18건)