본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한국전력시장의 변동비가격제도에 관한 소고

The Legal Issues of the CBP system in the Korean Power Pool

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Like advanced and developing countries having undertaken market-driven reform in the power industry, Korea began transforming the structure of its electricity industry from the public monopoly to market competition in 1997. As the first step of the restructuring plan, the division of generation was separated from the state-owned monopoly company(KEPCO) and the Korea Power Exchange(KPX) was formed as a market and system operator to govern the power pool and network system of the electricity industry. The pricing method chosen for use in the Korean power pool is the Cost Based Price(CBP) system, under which the price is determined by the KPX as the sum of the System Marginal Price(SMP) plus the predetermined Capacity Payment(CP). Therefore the price determined by the KPX is not real market price. This paper examines the issues whether the Constitutional Law, the Electricity Business Law or the Korean Competition Law admit the CBP system, which does not allow the electricity enterprisers' freedom to set the price of their own commodities.

Abstract

Like advanced and developing countries having undertaken market-driven reform in the power industry, Korea began transforming the structure of its electricity industry from the public monopoly to market competition in 1997. As the first step of the restructuring plan, the division of generation was separated from the state-owned monopoly company(KEPCO) and the Korea Power Exchange(KPX) was formed as a market and system operator to govern the power pool and network system of the electricity industry. The pricing method chosen for use in the Korean power pool is the Cost Based Price(CBP) system, under which the price is determined by the KPX as the sum of the System Marginal Price(SMP) plus the predetermined Capacity Payment(CP). Therefore the price determined by the KPX is not real market price. This paper examines the issues whether the Constitutional Law, the Electricity Business Law or the Korean Competition Law admit the CBP system, which does not allow the electricity enterprisers' freedom to set the price of their own commodities.

참고문헌 (16)

  1. 공정거래위원회, "공정거래위원회20년사: 시장경제창달의 발자취", ~ (2001)
  2. 김유환, "행정규제기본법의 내용과 문제점(상) in 고시연구", ~ (1997)
  3. 김형성, "경제헌법과 경제간섭의 한계", 공법연구, 21 (1993)
  4. 전력산업구조개편 이후 규제체계에 관한 연구 연구보고서 2000-04, "남일총", 한 개발연구원, ~ (2000)
  5. 박훤일, "전력산업 구조개편의 효율화를 위한 좌초비용의 유동화 방안", 상사법연구, 25(1) (2007)
  6. 신현윤, "경제법" (2006), 법문사
  7. 심학봉, "한국의 전력사업 구조개편과 법률 해설" (2001), 궁리출판
  8. 이기수, "경제법" (2004), 세창출판사
  9. 이남기, "경제법" (2001), 박영사
  10. 이문지, "전력시장의 경쟁도입과 규제" (2006), 배재대학교 출판부
  11. 이문지, "행정지도와 공정거래법의 적용제외 및 부당한 공동행위의 성립요건", 경영법률, 16(1) (2005), 한국경영법률학회
  12. 이문지, "미국의 경제규제와 반트러스트법의 적용제외: 통신산업의 경우를 중심으로", 상사법연구, 20(1) (2001), 한국상사법학회
  13. 이문지, "한국 공정거래법 비판: 부당한 자금·자산·인력지원행위 금지의 문제점" (1997), 자유기업센터
  14. 장석권, "우리 헌법상 경제질서의 기본원칙과 그 법적 성격", 월간고시 (1984)
  15. Nowicki, Elizabeth A., "Denial of Regulatory Assistance in Stranded Cost Recovery in a Deregulated Electric Industry", Loy. L.A. L. Rev, 32, pp.431~ (1999)
  16. Tomain, Joseph P., "Electricity Restructuring: A Case Study in Govern- ment Regulation", Tulsa L.J, 33, pp.827~ (1998)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (20건)