본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

전력시장에서의 공정거래법 집행에 관한 연구 - EU 경쟁법 집행사례의 시사점을 중심으로 -

A Study on Competition Law Enforcement in the Electric Power Market

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Electricity is an essential for everyday human lives and it is a fundamental mission of a modern nation to ensure stable and reliable supply of electricity on reasonable price. However, the electric power industry of Korea is suffering from chronicle shortages of supply and soaring wholesale price of electric power and securing stable electric power supply and an efficient electricity market has emerged again as a major national agenda. The electric power industry of Korea had been monopolized by the vertically integrated state-run Korea Electric Power Corporation (KEPCO) for decades. In early 2000’s, the Korean Government, affected by the international trend toward liberalization of and introduction of competition to electric power industries, launched restructuring of the industry in order to establish a competitive electricity market on both wholesale and retail level. However, the restructuring came to a deadlock after KEPCO’s electricity generation unit had been split into six subsidiaries. Incomplete introduction of competition and lack of adequate competition law enforcement in the Korean electric power industry resulted in very unstable and inefficient electric power markets. For establishing an efficient and reliable electric power market, the reform of the electric power market should be fully accomplished and rigorous competition law enforcement in the market should follow. In light of the European experience of competition policy initiatives and competition law enforcement in the energy sector, competition law enforcement in the Korean electric power market should focus upon preventing abuses of market dominance such as capacity withdrawals by market dominant generators and long-term electricity supply contracts which have effect of foreclosing new entrants from newly opened electricity market. Depending on the network unbundling model chosen through the reform process, securing third party access to the networks on fair and nondiscriminatory terms is another key issue which competition law enforcement in electric power markets should pay attention to.

Abstract

Electricity is an essential for everyday human lives and it is a fundamental mission of a modern nation to ensure stable and reliable supply of electricity on reasonable price. However, the electric power industry of Korea is suffering from chronicle shortages of supply and soaring wholesale price of electric power and securing stable electric power supply and an efficient electricity market has emerged again as a major national agenda. The electric power industry of Korea had been monopolized by the vertically integrated state-run Korea Electric Power Corporation (KEPCO) for decades. In early 2000’s, the Korean Government, affected by the international trend toward liberalization of and introduction of competition to electric power industries, launched restructuring of the industry in order to establish a competitive electricity market on both wholesale and retail level. However, the restructuring came to a deadlock after KEPCO’s electricity generation unit had been split into six subsidiaries. Incomplete introduction of competition and lack of adequate competition law enforcement in the Korean electric power industry resulted in very unstable and inefficient electric power markets. For establishing an efficient and reliable electric power market, the reform of the electric power market should be fully accomplished and rigorous competition law enforcement in the market should follow. In light of the European experience of competition policy initiatives and competition law enforcement in the energy sector, competition law enforcement in the Korean electric power market should focus upon preventing abuses of market dominance such as capacity withdrawals by market dominant generators and long-term electricity supply contracts which have effect of foreclosing new entrants from newly opened electricity market. Depending on the network unbundling model chosen through the reform process, securing third party access to the networks on fair and nondiscriminatory terms is another key issue which competition law enforcement in electric power markets should pay attention to.

참고문헌 (36)

  1. 다니구치 하루히토, "구미의 전력자유화와 전력시스템", 전기평론 (2004)
  2. 오성은, "전력산업의 경쟁도입에 따른 독점규제에 관한 연구", 박사, 법학과 경제법전공, pp.2013
  3. 이호영, "우리나라 전력산업 구조개편의 현황과 과제, In 공정거래법의 쟁점과 과제" (2010), 법문사
  4. 이호영, "경쟁법상 ‘공동의 시장지배력’ 개념에 관한 연구", 법학논총, 26(2), pp.197~228 (2009), 법학연구소
  5. 전력산업구조개편 : 주요 쟁점과 대안, "임원혁", 한국개발연구원, ~ (2004)
  6. 그린에너지산업 발전을 위한 제도 및 정책연구 - 전력시장및 전력거래제도 관련분야를 중심으로, "조창현", 산업연구원, ~, pp.연구보고서 2010-564 (2010)
  7. 가스산업과 경쟁정책, "공정거래위원회", ~, pp.주요산업 경쟁정책보고서 시리즈, 2009-1 (2009)
  8. 석유산업 경쟁정책, "공정거래위원회", ~, pp.주요산업 경쟁정책보고서 시리즈 2008-5 (2009)
  9. 전력산업 구조개편 기본계획, "산업자원부", ~ (1999)
  10. 전력시장분석보고서, "전력시장감시위원회", ~ (2012)
  11. 2011년도 발전설비현황, "전력거래소", ~ (2012)
  12. 전력시장동향, "전기위원회", ~ (2013)
  13. 2011년도 전력시장통계, "전력거래소", ~ (2011)
  14. 2011 전력시장분석보고서, "전력시장감시위원회", ~ (2011)
  15. 2011년 해외전력산업동향, "전력거래소", ~ (2011)
  16. 2012 지식경제백서, "지식경제부", ~ (2012)
  17. Capacity to compete : recent trends in access regimes in electricity and natural gas networks, "Adrien de Hauteclocque", EUI, ~ (2011)
  18. Competition v regulation: where do the roles of sector specific and competition regulators begin and end?, "Almunia, Joaquin", European Commission-speech, ~ (2010)
  19. LICE Electricity Sector Country Study: France, "Barth, Volker", Carl von Ossietzky University, ~ (2008)
  20. The Energiewende – Germany’s gamble, "Buchan, David", The Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, ~ (2012)
  21. Cameron, Peter, "Competition in Energy Markets: law and regulation in the European Union (2nd ed.)" (2007), Oxford University Press
  22. Cariello, Francesco, "The Italian Electricity Market", The Regulatory Authority for Electricity and Gas, ~ (2008)
  23. Commission (EC), "DG Competition Report on Energy Sector Inquiry", COMP SEC, 1724~ (2006)
  24. Commission of the European Communities, "An Energy Policy for Europe", COM, 1~ (2007)
  25. Diathesopoulos, Michael D., "From Energy Sector Inquiry to Recent Antitrust Decisions in European Energy Markets: Competition Law as a Means to Implement Sector Regulation", ~ (2010)
  26. European Commission, "Internal Energy Market", COM, 238~ (1988)
  27. European Commission, "Making the internal energy market work", COM, 663~ (2012)
  28. Heddenhausen, Matthias, "Privatisations in Europe’s liberalised electricity markets – the cases of the United Kingdom, Sweden, Germany, and France", Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik, ~ (2007)
  29. Johnson, Debra, "Strategy and policy for trans-European networks" (2007), Palgrave Macmillan
  30. Jones, Christopher, "EU energy law : volume 1 The internal energy market The third liberalization package (3rd ed.)" (2010), Claeys & Casteels
  31. OECD, "Reviews of Regulatory Reform – Germany", ~ (2004)
  32. Rangoni, Bernardo, "Explaining the incomplete liberlization reform of the italian energy markets", Fourth annual conference on competition and regulation in network industries (2011)
  33. Scholz, Ulrich, "The application of EU competition law in the energy sector", Journal of European Competition law & Practice, 23, pp.12~ (2010)
  34. Subiotto, Romano QC, "Recent EU case law developments : Article 102 TFEU", Journal of European Competition law & Practice (2010)
  35. Annual Report 2011, "The Italian Regulatory Authority for Electricity and Gas(AEEG)", ~ (2011)
  36. The Unbundling Regime for Electricity Utilities in the EU: A Case of Legislative and Regulatory Capture?, "Van Koten, Silvester", CERGE-EI, ~ (2007)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)