중국 반독점법상 독점합의에 관한 고찰
A Study on the Monopoly Agreement in the Chinese Anti-Monopoly Law
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The exclusive agreement in China is defined as "an agreement, decision and other cooperative behavior which excludes or limit the competition between managers at competition." The Chinese Anti- Monopoly Law divides such an exclusive agreement into a horizontal exclusive agreement and a vertical exclusive agreement and lists under such a division and stipulates that what is included in such a listed type is violation. An agreement which is not included in the listed type but has a competitive limitation can be regulated if the implementing agency of the government recognizes it. In addition, the law has an application exemption stipulation if provided under a law reflecting a positive side of an exclusive agreement. It is pointed as an issue that the court cannot correct an error of the implementation agency. Since the stipulations related to an exclusive agreement regulate only what is in principle, the necessity of detailed guidelines is presented. As the Anti-Monopoly Law is implemented in China, it is highly possible that the Anti-Monopoly Law is positively applied to an exclusive agreement which met a difficulty with the implementation of the law due to lack of legal basis of the conventional laws. Countries around the world are favorable toward the trend of strengthening the implementation of the competition law, and it is a general prospect that in China too, the implementation of the Anti-Monopoly Law will strengthen the competition law against the violations of competition order in China. So, Korean enterprises should take every measure in preparation for the positive application of the Anti-Monopoly Law by checking the business practices done in the past.
Abstract
The exclusive agreement in China is defined as "an agreement, decision and other cooperative behavior which excludes or limit the competition between managers at competition." The Chinese Anti- Monopoly Law divides such an exclusive agreement into a horizontal exclusive agreement and a vertical exclusive agreement and lists under such a division and stipulates that what is included in such a listed type is violation. An agreement which is not included in the listed type but has a competitive limitation can be regulated if the implementing agency of the government recognizes it. In addition, the law has an application exemption stipulation if provided under a law reflecting a positive side of an exclusive agreement. It is pointed as an issue that the court cannot correct an error of the implementation agency. Since the stipulations related to an exclusive agreement regulate only what is in principle, the necessity of detailed guidelines is presented. As the Anti-Monopoly Law is implemented in China, it is highly possible that the Anti-Monopoly Law is positively applied to an exclusive agreement which met a difficulty with the implementation of the law due to lack of legal basis of the conventional laws. Countries around the world are favorable toward the trend of strengthening the implementation of the competition law, and it is a general prospect that in China too, the implementation of the Anti-Monopoly Law will strengthen the competition law against the violations of competition order in China. So, Korean enterprises should take every measure in preparation for the positive application of the Anti-Monopoly Law by checking the business practices done in the past.
참고문헌 (43)
- 권오승, (2009), 법문사
- 김도현, "중국 반독점법" (2009), 법문사
- 김동훈, "중화인민공화국 반독점법", 외법논집, (29), pp.375~404 (2008), 법학연구소
- 김범중, "중국 반독점법에 관한 소고", 경쟁법연구, 12 (2005), 한국경쟁법학회
- 김종우, "중국반독점법에 대한 고찰: 2007년 8월 30일 통과된《반독점법》을 중심으로", 국제지역연구, 11(3), pp.1051~1079 (2007), 국제지역학회
- 마 광, "중국 법의 연원에 대한 연구", 인권과정의, (395) (2009), 대한변호사협회
- 박제현, "중화인민공화국 반독점법", 중국법연구, 8 (2007), 한중법학회
- 박제현, "중국의 “반부정당경쟁법(反不正当竟爭法)”에 대한 고찰", 중국법연구, 9, pp.175~196 (2008), 한중법학회
- 박제현, "중국의 경쟁법 주요 동향", 경쟁저널 (2008), 한국공정거래협회
- 徐士英, "중국 독점규제입법에 있어서 몇가지 문제점", 경쟁법연구, 12 (2005), 한국경쟁법학회
- 손영화, "中國 反獨占法에 관한 硏究", 상사법연구, 27(3), pp.351~390 (2008), 한국상사법학회
- 이기수, (2006), 세창출판사
- 이상옥, "중국 반독점법의 의미와 내용", 원광법학, 24(4), pp.269~290 (2008), 법학연구소
- 전대규, "중국민사소송법" (2008), 박영사
- 정주환, "중국반독점법의 제정 과제 - 한중 반독점법 비교", 법학논총, 33(1), pp.625~652 (2009), 법학연구소
- 조동제, "중국 반독점입법의 초점 문제에 대한 평가와 분석", 중국학연구, (45), pp.509~532 (2008), 중국학연구회
- 周昀, "중국 반독점입법에 있어서의 몇 가지 문제에 대한 검토", 중국법연구, 7 (2007), 한중법학회
- 최창익, "중국 반독점법에 관한 고찰", 중국법연구, 8 (2007), 한중법학회
- 孔祥俊, "论反不正当竞争法中的竞争关系", 工商行政管理, (19) (1999), 国家工商行政管理总局
- 孔祥俊, "论反不正当竞争法中的竞争关系(續)", 工商行政管理, (20) (1999), 国家工商行政管理总局
- 董 灵, "论我国《反垄断法》禁止的价格垄断协议", 价格理论与实践, (7) (2008), 中国价格协会
- 邓志松, "纵向垄断协议解析", 中国外资, (1) (2008)
- 北京市高級人民法院知識産權庭, "北京知識産權審判案例硏究" (2000), 法律出版社
- 史际春, "反垄断法 理解与适用" (2007), 中国法制出版社
- 时建中, "我国《反垄断法》的特色制度、亮点制度及重大不足", 法学家, (1) (2008), 中国人民大学
- 杨 洁, "对我国反垄断法有关垄断协议规制的理解与认识(一)", 工商行政管理, (21) (2009), 国家工商行政管理总局
- 杨 洁, "对我国反垄断法有关垄断协议规制的理解与认识(二)", 工商行政管理, (22) (2009), 国家工商行政管理总局
- 王德亮, "浅析对价格垄断行为的监管", 价格与市场, (12) (2009), 陕西省物价局‧陕西省价格学会
- 王長秋, "我國《反壟斷法》“壟斷協議”解析", 法學雜誌, (1) (2008), 北京市法学会
- 王焕菊, "对反垄断法下的纵向垄断协议的研究", 法制与社会, (9) (2008), 云南省法学会
- 王晓晔, "中华人民共和国反垄断法详解" (2008), 知识产权出版社
- 王晓晔, "王晓晔论反垄断法. In: ,《中华人民共和国反垄断法》析评" (2010), 社会科学文献出版社
- 李攀贵, "我国反垄断法对相关市场的界定", 法制与社会, (32) (2009), 云南省法学会
- 张 桐, "垄断协议表现形式的认定标准之构建", 黑龙江省正法管理干部学院学报, (4) (2008)
- 张白沙, "隐蔽垄断协议的调查分析方法", 法制与社会, (23) (2009), 云南省法学会
- 郑 翔, "协调反垄断法与价格法关系的探讨", 北京交通大学学报, (3) (2007)
- 鄭友德, "現代反不正當競爭法中“競爭關係”之界定", 法商硏究, (6) (2002)
- 陳雲良, "垄断协议中协同行为的证明问题研究", 政治与法律, (10) (2008)
- 肖林虹, "贯彻《反垄断法》完善反价格垄断法规体系", 中国价格监督检查, (7) (2008), 中国价格协会
- 焦海涛, "论《反垄断法》中经营者的认定标准", 东方法学, (5) (2008), 上海市法学会
- 种明钊, "竞争法" (2008), 法律出版社
- 许光耀, "《反垄断发》中垄断协议条款之评析", 法学杂志, (1) (2008), 北京市法学会
- 胡海龙, "反垄断法中的 "交易相对人"", 消费导刊, (11) (2008), 中国轻工业联合会