자료독점권(Data Exclusivity), 사실상 특허권 존속기간의 연장인가?
Data exclusivity, does actually mean extension of the term of a patent right?
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article relates to study on data exclusivity which is described on "Free Trade Agreement between the Republic of Korea and the United States of America(here in after, refer to as 'Korea-U.S. FTA')". It is said that data exclusivity and the brand new approval-patent linkage system are typical examples of Trips-plus provisions. Korea already have been protecting the data which is submitted for approval of new drug since 1995. However, the present data exclusivity system has several problems. First, data exclusivity right is enforced in drug reexamination system which is drafted for reviewing of safety and efficacy of drug product, consequently totally different from data exclusivity system as to purpose. Second, the period of protecting is too long and the level of protecting is too high under the present Korea data exclusivity system compared with those under America or Korea-U.S. FTA data exclusivity system. Finally, in Korea, data exclusivity system is just described in Korea Food and Drug Administration Rule which is not an Act. Therefore this article suggested to revise Korean pharmaceutical affairs law reads as follows. (i) The applicant who submitted information for approval of new chemical entities are entitled to have 5 years data exclusivity from the date of marketing approval as to the safety or efficacy information submitted in support of the marketing approval, or evidence of the marketing approval. (ii) The applicant who submitted information for approval of a pharmaceutical product that includes a chemical entity that has been previously approved for marketing in another pharmaceutical product are entitled to have 3 years data exclusivity from the date of marketing approval as to the new clinical information which is essential to the approval of the pharmaceutical product and submitted in support of the marketing approval.
Abstract
This article relates to study on data exclusivity which is described on "Free Trade Agreement between the Republic of Korea and the United States of America(here in after, refer to as 'Korea-U.S. FTA')". It is said that data exclusivity and the brand new approval-patent linkage system are typical examples of Trips-plus provisions. Korea already have been protecting the data which is submitted for approval of new drug since 1995. However, the present data exclusivity system has several problems. First, data exclusivity right is enforced in drug reexamination system which is drafted for reviewing of safety and efficacy of drug product, consequently totally different from data exclusivity system as to purpose. Second, the period of protecting is too long and the level of protecting is too high under the present Korea data exclusivity system compared with those under America or Korea-U.S. FTA data exclusivity system. Finally, in Korea, data exclusivity system is just described in Korea Food and Drug Administration Rule which is not an Act. Therefore this article suggested to revise Korean pharmaceutical affairs law reads as follows. (i) The applicant who submitted information for approval of new chemical entities are entitled to have 5 years data exclusivity from the date of marketing approval as to the safety or efficacy information submitted in support of the marketing approval, or evidence of the marketing approval. (ii) The applicant who submitted information for approval of a pharmaceutical product that includes a chemical entity that has been previously approved for marketing in another pharmaceutical product are entitled to have 3 years data exclusivity from the date of marketing approval as to the new clinical information which is essential to the approval of the pharmaceutical product and submitted in support of the marketing approval.
참고문헌 (16)
- 김호철, "韓美自由貿易協定 醫藥品 知財權 協商結果 關聯 法的 爭點 分析", 서울대학교 법학, 50(2), pp.615~652 (2009), 법학연구소
- 박성민, "특허권 비실시자의 특허가 침해된 경우 구제 방법으로서 Liability Rule", 창작과 권리, (58), pp.74~121 (2010), 세창출판사
- 박실비아, "의약품 자료독점제도의 국가별 현황과 국내 제도의 발전방향", Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation, 39(4), pp.299~307 (2009), 한국약제학회
- 박영규, "에버그린 전략의 산업적, 특허법적 그리고 경쟁법적 문제", 창작과 권리, (58), pp.122~160 (2010), 세창출판사
- 박지현, "한미FTA 속의 TRIPs-Plus", 국제법학회논총, 53(2), pp.85~108 (2008), 대한국제법학회
- 선정원, "의약법상 자료독점권에 관한 고찰", 행정법연구, (25), pp.371~409 (2009), 행정법이론실무학회(行政法理論實務學會)
- 신재호, "특허권 효력에 관한 검토 - Patent Troll의 남용적 권리행사에 대한 효력 제한 방안을 중심으로 -", 산업재산권, (30), pp.105~147 (2009), 한국산업재산권법학회
- 신혜은, "의약품 판매허가를 위한 특허발명의 시험적 실시행위와 특허권의 침해", 지식재산연구 (2008)
- 정차호, "식약청 판매허가와 특허권의 연계를 위한 특허심판의 당사자 적격", 산업재산권, (25), pp.161~202 (2008), 한국산업재산권법학회
- 최승재, "제약시장에서의 역지급합의에 대한 경쟁법 적용에 관한 연구", 경쟁법연구, 19, pp.118~158 (2009), 한국경쟁법학회
- 한미 FTA 대한민국 보고서. In: 한미 FTA의 경제효과: 의약품⋅보건서비스 분야, "최원목", 선진화국민회의, ~ (2006)
- 특허권 실효성 확보 필요성에 관한 연구, , 특허청, ~ (2010)
- 물질특허제도가 국내 특허제도 및 산업발전에 미친 영향 분석 최종보고서, "한국IP보호기술연구소", 특허청, ~ (2004)
- Rebecca S. Eisenberg, "The Problem of New Uses", Yale J. Health Pol'y L. & Ethics, 717 (2005)
- J. Holding, "Do orphan medicines benefit patients", The Pharmaceutical Journal, 280 (2008)
- K. Hoppu, "A summary of the EU paediatric initiatives, WHO Expert Consultation on Essential Medicines for Children", ~ (2007)
