본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

허가받지 않은 토지신탁의 채권적 효력

Claim Effect of Land Transaction and Trust under no Approval

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Land transaction approval system is that the lands which are to be developed are designated as the zone of land transaction approval and only transaction appropriate to the purpose of land use can be approved and the ownership of land can be transferred, in order to prevent real estate speculation and increasing of land price. Otherwise the prospect at the time of legislation, the effectiveness of the system itself have diminished, because betray of trust against land double-sale and violation against Act on Special Measures for Registration of Real Estate by false application for registration of real estate, ect can not be punished in criminal within zone of land transaction approval, as a result that court have applied the principal of "nulla poena sine lege" strictly to relating criminal case. In view of relating to failure of criminal effectiveness and prevent speculation forehand, the doctrine of making a denial to not only real right validity but also claim validity of the transactions under no approval of competent authorities is very significant. If the claim validity of them is recognized, there will happen frequent land transaction or speculation in way to preserve the qualification of vendee through provisional registration and resale it. On the side of civil law principle otherwise crime precedents, land double-sale within zone of land transaction approval should be determinate void as anti-social actions. Recently instead of preserving and resaling claim position of vendee by provisional registration, there have been mostly abused trust registration in way of which vendee in substance become beneficiary prior to other credits and land ownerships are transferred to beneficiary or person whom he/she will specify in order to secure claim effect of land transaction under no approval by evading or circumventing law. As this kind of trust must be typical evasive trust which is prohibited by Trust Act article sixth, the claim effect of this kind of land trusts under no approval should be also denied by extension of principal in which even claim effect of land transactions under no approval within zone of land transaction approval should be denied.

Abstract

Land transaction approval system is that the lands which are to be developed are designated as the zone of land transaction approval and only transaction appropriate to the purpose of land use can be approved and the ownership of land can be transferred, in order to prevent real estate speculation and increasing of land price. Otherwise the prospect at the time of legislation, the effectiveness of the system itself have diminished, because betray of trust against land double-sale and violation against Act on Special Measures for Registration of Real Estate by false application for registration of real estate, ect can not be punished in criminal within zone of land transaction approval, as a result that court have applied the principal of "nulla poena sine lege" strictly to relating criminal case. In view of relating to failure of criminal effectiveness and prevent speculation forehand, the doctrine of making a denial to not only real right validity but also claim validity of the transactions under no approval of competent authorities is very significant. If the claim validity of them is recognized, there will happen frequent land transaction or speculation in way to preserve the qualification of vendee through provisional registration and resale it. On the side of civil law principle otherwise crime precedents, land double-sale within zone of land transaction approval should be determinate void as anti-social actions. Recently instead of preserving and resaling claim position of vendee by provisional registration, there have been mostly abused trust registration in way of which vendee in substance become beneficiary prior to other credits and land ownerships are transferred to beneficiary or person whom he/she will specify in order to secure claim effect of land transaction under no approval by evading or circumventing law. As this kind of trust must be typical evasive trust which is prohibited by Trust Act article sixth, the claim effect of this kind of land trusts under no approval should be also denied by extension of principal in which even claim effect of land transactions under no approval within zone of land transaction approval should be denied.

참고문헌 (11)

  1. 강문종, "거래허가대상토지에 대한 매매계약과 허가전의 계약청산관계 - 허가협력의무를 중심으로", 판례연구, 5 (1995), 부산판례연구회
  2. 김상용, "토지거래허가의 법리구성 : 대법원(전원합의체) 1991. 12. 24.선고 90다 12243 판결", 민사판례연구, 15 (1993), 민사판례연구회
  3. 김홍엽, "토지거래허가구역 내의 토지매매계약 체결시 협력의무불이행 내지 허가신청 이전 매매계약의 철회에 대한 배상예정의 효력", 대법원 판례해설(1994년 상반기 판), ~ (1994)
  4. 김희태, "토지거래 허가구역내의 토지에 대한 거래허가전의 이중양도와 배임죄의 성부", 法曹, 44(7) (1995), 법조협회
  5. 소재선, "거래허가구역내 토지의 허가구역 지정해제와 유동적 무효 계약해제의 가부 - 98다40459", 판례월보, (348) (1999), 판례월보사
  6. 오창수, "토지거래허가를 받지 아니한 거래당사간의 법률관계", 판례연구, 9 (1995), 서울지방변호사회
  7. 오창수, "토지거래허가구역 지정해제와 토지거래계약의 효력", 판례연구, 13 (1999), 서울지방변호사회
  8. 이은영, "토지거래허가를 조건으로 하는 매매계약 및 손해배상액의 예정", 판례월보 (1991), 판례월보사
  9. 이주흥, "토지거래허가를 받지 아니한 토지매매계약의 효력", 법조 (1990), 법조협회
  10. 지원림, "민법강의 (제6판)" (2008), 홍문사
  11. 정상현, "거래허가 대상토지의 투기적 이중매매행위 방지대책", 성균관법학, 16(3), pp.229~262 (2004), 법학연구소

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)