A Political Economy Analysis of Rules of Origin Requirements of Korea-US FTA with a New Measure of the Requirements
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Our paper contributes to the literature on the rules of origin (ROO) requirements ofregional trade agreements by developing a new measure of ROO requirements and bymodifying and testing an existing political economy model of ROO requirements with thedata of the Korea-United States Free Trade Agreement (KORUS FTA). In explaining theutilization rates of KORUS FTA, Bindingness Index, the new measure of ROOrequirements taking the status quo local content of a product into consideration, performsbetter than the existing measure proposed by Estevadeordal (2000). To reflect that the UShas agreed to immediate and complete liberalization on most products in KORUS FTA, wemodify the political economy model of ROO requirements of Cadot et al. (2006) byassuming that the preferential tariff rates are zero. This modification leads to testablepredictions, some of which differs from the prediction of Cadot et al. (2006), and ourempirical analysis supports the predictions of our modified political economy model.
Abstract
Our paper contributes to the literature on the rules of origin (ROO) requirements ofregional trade agreements by developing a new measure of ROO requirements and bymodifying and testing an existing political economy model of ROO requirements with thedata of the Korea-United States Free Trade Agreement (KORUS FTA). In explaining theutilization rates of KORUS FTA, Bindingness Index, the new measure of ROOrequirements taking the status quo local content of a product into consideration, performsbetter than the existing measure proposed by Estevadeordal (2000). To reflect that the UShas agreed to immediate and complete liberalization on most products in KORUS FTA, wemodify the political economy model of ROO requirements of Cadot et al. (2006) byassuming that the preferential tariff rates are zero. This modification leads to testablepredictions, some of which differs from the prediction of Cadot et al. (2006), and ourempirical analysis supports the predictions of our modified political economy model.
참고문헌 (10)
- Cadot, "Assessing the Effect of NAFTA’s Rules of Origin", Mimeo (2002)
- Cadot, "The Origin of Goods: Rules of Origin in Free-Trade Agreements", pp.149~172 (2006), Oxford University Press
- Duttagupta, R., "Free Trade Areas and Rules of Origin: Economics and Politics", Economics Politics, 19(2), pp.169~190 (2007)
- Estevadeordal, A, "Negotiating Preferential Market Access", Journal of World Trade, 34(1), pp.141~166 (2000)
- Freund, C. L., "Regional Trade Agreements", Annual Review of Economics, 2, pp.139~167 (2010)
- Grossman, G. M., "The Politics of Free-Trade Agreements", The American Economic Review, 85(4), pp.667~690 (1995)
- Krishna, K, "The Origin of Goods: Rules of Origin in Free-Trade Agreements", pp.19~34 (2006), Oxford University Press
- Krishna, K., "Firm Behaviour and Market Access in a Free Trade Area with Rules of Origin", Canadian Journal of Economics, 38(1), pp.290~308 (2005)
- Implementing Free Trade Areas: Rules of Origin and Hidden Protection, "Krishna, K.", National Bureau of Economic Research, ~, pp.NBER Working Papers 4983 (1995)
- Free Trade Agreements as Protectionist Devices: Rules of Origin, "Krueger, A", National Bureau of Economic Research, ~, pp.NBER Working Papers 4352 (1993)
