문제해결학습에서의 동료피드백: 피드백 수용도의 매개효과 탐색

키워드

참고문헌 (67)

1. 강인애, "PBL 의 이론과 실제" (2003), 문음사
2. 고수일, "피드백 수용도의 결정요인", 인적자원개발연구, 6(2), pp.21~44 (2004)
3. 문영인, "한국 대학 영작문에 나타나는 동료 수정의 성격", 영어교육, 55(1), pp.119~140 (2000)
4. 박통희, "신뢰의 개념에 대한 비판적 검토와 재구성", 한국행정학보, 33(2), pp.1~17 (1999)
5. 서영진, "작문 활동에서 동료 피드백 의견 유형별 수용도 연구", 국어교육학연구, (45), pp.215~244 (2012), 국어교육학회
6. 서혜선, "SPSS 회귀분석" (2013), 한나래출판사
7. 시지현, "의과대학 문제기반학습에서 튜터 수행 및 집단 효능감이 학업성취와 학습자 만족도에 미치는 영향", 교육방법연구, 28(1), pp.103~123 (2016), 한국교육방법학회
8. 오예은, "동료의 대면 피드백과 익명 피드백이 대학생의 영작문 수정에 미치는 영향 탐구", 영어영문학21, 28(1), pp.219~243 (2015), 21세기영어영문학회
9. 이영주, "동료 피드백의 기능적 특성이 예비 교사의 수업 관찰과 수업 설계에 미치는 영향", 학습자중심교과교육연구, 15(5), pp.187~206 (2015), 학습자중심교과교육학회
10. 이영주, "블로그 학습 환경에서 학생들의 유용성 인식, 피드백 수용도, 과제 성과에 영향을 주는 동료 피드백 유형 분석", 교육정보미디어연구, 21(2), pp.245~264 (2015), 한국교육정보미디어학회[DOI]
11. 이윤빈, "대학생 글쓰기에서 동료 피드백의 양상 및 타당도 연구", 작문연구, (20), pp.299~334 (2014), 한국작문학회
12. 이현우, "웹 블렌디드(Web-blended) 과제수행에서 학습동기, 학습자 간 피드백, 그리고 학습성과의 구조적 관계", 교육정보미디어연구, 15(4), pp.129~147 (2009), 한국교육정보미디어학회
13. 임정훈, "상호작용 관점에서 조망해 본 웹 기반 교육의 이론적 기저", 교육공학연구, 15(3), pp.29~49 (1999)
14. 전희정, "웹기반 문제중심학습(PBL)에서 메타인지와 스캐폴딩 유형이 성취에 미치는 영향", 박사, 교육학, pp.2007
15. 정재삼, "웹 기반 토론에서 학습자의 참여도, 성취도 및 만족도 관련 요인의 효과 분석", 교육공학연구, 16(2), pp.107~135 (2000)
16. 조경진, "SNS를 활용한 성찰활동에서 동료학습자의 피드백 제공이 학습자의 학업적 자기효능감, 메타인지, 학업성취도에 미치는 영향", 교육공학연구, 31(3), pp.401~430 (2015), 한국교육공학회[DOI]
17. 최인섭, "피드백 구체성, 상사에 대한 신뢰가 직무 만족과 직무몰입에 미치는 효과: 피드백 수용성의 매개효과를 중심으로", 한국심리학회 연차 학술발표논문집, pp.248~248 (2011)
18. 홍순복, "참여의사결정과 대인신뢰가 생산성에 미치는 영향", 한국콘텐츠학회 논문지, 5(6), pp.264~272 (2005), 한국콘텐츠학회
19. Anderson, R. C., "Feedback procedures in programmed instruction", Journal of Educational Psychology, 62(2), pp.148~ (1971)
20. Anseel, F., "The mediating role of feedback acceptance in the relationship between feedback and attitudinal and performance outcomes", International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 17(4), pp.362~376 (2009)
21. Blumenfeld, P. C., "Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning", Educational Psychologist, 26(3-4), pp.369~398 (1991)
22. Braaksma, M. A., "Observational learning and its effects on the orchestration of writing processes", Cognition and Instruction, 22(1), pp.1~36 (2004)
23. Cho, K., "Self-monitoring support for learning to write", Interactive Learning Environments, 18(2), pp.101~113 (2010)
24. Cho, K., "Student revision with peer and expert reviewing", Learning and Instruction, 20(4), pp.328~338 (2010)
25. Cho, K., "Scaffolded writing and rewriting in the discipline: a web-based reciprocal peer review system", Computers & Education, 48(3), pp.409~426 (2007)
26. Choi, H. H., "Effects of the physical environment on cognitive load and learning: Towards a new model of cognitive load", Educational Psychology Review, 26(2), pp.225~244 (2014)
27. Davies, P., "Computerized peer assessment", Innovations in Education and Training International, 37(4), pp.346~354 (2000)
28. Ertmer, P. A., "Using peer feedback to enhance the quality of student online postings: An exploratory study", Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 12(2), pp.412~433 (2007)
29. Ferris, D., "Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be?", Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(3), pp.161~184 (2001)
30. Fulk, J., "Trust-in-supervisor and perceived fairness and accuracy of performance evaluations", Journal of Business Research, 13(4), pp.301~313 (1985)
31. Garrison, D. R., "Critical thinking and self-directed learning in adult education: An analysis of responsibility and control issues", Adult education quarterly, 42(3), pp.136~148 (1992)
32. Ge, X., "Scaffolding students’problem-solving processes on an ill-structured task using question prompts and peer interactions", doctor, pp.2001
33. Gibbs, G., "Assessment Matters in Higher Education", pp.41~53 (1999), Open University Press
34. Gibbs, G., "Does your assessment support your students’ learning", Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 1(1), pp.3~31 (2004)
35. Gielen, S., "Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning", Learning and Instruction, 20(4), pp.304~315 (2010)
36. Hyland, K., "Persuasion and context: The pragmatics of academic metadiscourse", Journal of pragmatics, 30(4), pp.437~455 (1998)
37. Ilgen, D. R., "Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations", Journal of Applied Psychology, 64(4), pp.349~371 (1979)
38. Jonassen, D. H., "Learning to solve problems: An instructional design guide" (2004), Pfeiffer
39. Judd, C. M., "Process analysis: Estimating mediation in treatment evaluations", Evaluation Review, 5(5), pp.602~619 (1981)
40. Kim, M., "The effects of the assessor and Assessee’s roles on preservice teachers’ metacognitive awareness, performance, and attitude in a technology-related design task", doctor, pp.2005
41. Kluger, A. N., "The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory", Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), pp.254~284 (1996)
42. Leki, I., "Preferences of ESL students for error correction in college level writing classes", Foreign Language Annals, 24(3), pp.203~218 (1991)
43. Lewis, J. D., "Trust as a social reality", Social Forces, 63, pp.967~985 (1985)
44. Li, L., "Assessor or assessee: How student learning improves by giving and receiving peer feedback", British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(3), pp.525~536 (2010)
45. Li, L., "Give and take: A re-analysis of assessor and assessee's roles in technology facilitated peer assessment", British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(3), pp.376~384 (2012)
46. Littleton, K., "Learning together: Understanding the processes of computer-based collaborative learning", Collaborative Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches, pp.20~30 (1999)
47. Ludvigsen, S. R., "CSCL: connecting the social, emotional and cognitive dimensions", IJ Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 11(2), pp.115~121 (2016)
48. Lynch, M. M., "The Online Educator: A Guide to Creating the Virtual Classroom" (2002), RoutledgeFalmer
49. McCroskey, J. C., "Scales for the measurement of ethos", Speech Monographs, 33(1), pp.65~72 (1966)
50. Narciss, S., "Feedback strategies for interactive learning tasks", Handbook of research on educational Communications and Technology, 3, pp.125~144 (2008)
51. Nease, A. A., "Relationships among feedback sign, self-efficacy, and acceptance of performance feedback", Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(5), pp.806~814 (1999)
52. Nelson, M. M., "The nature of feedback: How different types of peer feedback affect writing performance", Instructional Science, 37(4), pp.375~401 (2009)
53. Preacher, K. J., "SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models", Behavior research methods, 36(4), pp.717~731 (2004)
54. Price, M., "Feedback: all that effort, but what is the effect?", Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(3), pp.277~289 (2010)
55. Ridings, C. M., "Some antecedents and effects of trust in virtual communities", The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 11(3), pp.271~295 (2002)
56. Roehler, L. R., "Scaffolding Student Learning: Instructional Approaches and Issues", pp.6~42 (1997), Brookline
57. Savage, D., "Trust as a productivity management tool", Training and Development Journal, 36(2), pp.54~57 (1982)
58. Savery, J. R., "Problem based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework", Educational Technology, 35(5), pp.31~38 (1995)
59. Sawyer, K., "The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences" (2014), Cambridge University Press
60. Smyth, K., "The benefits of students learning about critical evaluation rather than being summatively judged", Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(3), pp.369~378 (2004)
61. Strijbos, J., "Peer feedback content and sender's competence level in academic writing revision tasks: Are they critical for feedback perceptions and efficiency?", Learning and Instruction, 20(4), pp.291~303 (2010)
62. Topping, K., "Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities", Review of educational Research, 68(3), pp.249~276 (1998)
63. Tseng, S. C., "On-line peer assessment and the role of the peer feedback:A study of high school computer course", Computers & Education, 49(4), pp.1161~1174 (2007)
64. Tsui, A. B., "Do secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments?", Journal of second language writing, 9(2), pp.147~170 (2000)
65. Wager, W., "Presenting questions, processing responses, and providing feedback in CAI", Journal of Instructional Development, 8(4), pp.2~8 (1985)
66. Yu, F. Y., "Predictive Effects of the Quality of Online Peer-Feedback Provided and Received on Primary School Students’ Quality of Question-Generation", Educational Technology & Society, 19(3), pp.234~247 (2016)
67. Zimmerman, B. J., "Acquiring writing revision and self-regulatory skill through observation and emulation", Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(4), pp.660~668 (2002)

관련 논문AI추천