정서교육에 대한 정당화
Justification to the Emotional Education
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
After Kant, autonomy has been the best end for education for a long time. Because morality can be derived from autonomy, at the point of that education deals with the problem of value and truth, autonomy can be a end of education as ever. But nowadays, many criticism occur to it. Here, emotional disposition can be the supplementation. So I would like to give the name 'the man of autonomic emotion' to the man of character as integrated man. Pitcher. G. criticizes the traditional view of the emotion because it is not rational and can't explain the internal reason of emotion. When Someone is in any emotional situation, there it is need for him to apprehend and to evaluate. Apprehension and evaluation are the core of the emotion. Namely emotion is cognitive. Emotional education can be justified by the notion of unified personality. And it also justified for the education of the emotional sensibility of the students. Emphasizing the emotion is also justified because it can make to realize the ethics of sympathy and consideration as the emotions. In the education, it needs to make emotional environments. It also is important to make sensibile at the emotion for students. Teachers have to pay attention for the education of the continual emotion. Emotional education is important because of emotional notion of the native culture of Korean too. So teachers have to teach the ability of researching the Korean native culture and the emotional words of Korean language. When related to Pitcher. G., in the emotions of an occurrent and a dispositional, the most importance is to make the students allowing the power of researching the rational core of the emotions. And in this cases, the permissible atmosphere is important in the classroom, too.
Abstract
After Kant, autonomy has been the best end for education for a long time. Because morality can be derived from autonomy, at the point of that education deals with the problem of value and truth, autonomy can be a end of education as ever. But nowadays, many criticism occur to it. Here, emotional disposition can be the supplementation. So I would like to give the name 'the man of autonomic emotion' to the man of character as integrated man. Pitcher. G. criticizes the traditional view of the emotion because it is not rational and can't explain the internal reason of emotion. When Someone is in any emotional situation, there it is need for him to apprehend and to evaluate. Apprehension and evaluation are the core of the emotion. Namely emotion is cognitive. Emotional education can be justified by the notion of unified personality. And it also justified for the education of the emotional sensibility of the students. Emphasizing the emotion is also justified because it can make to realize the ethics of sympathy and consideration as the emotions. In the education, it needs to make emotional environments. It also is important to make sensibile at the emotion for students. Teachers have to pay attention for the education of the continual emotion. Emotional education is important because of emotional notion of the native culture of Korean too. So teachers have to teach the ability of researching the Korean native culture and the emotional words of Korean language. When related to Pitcher. G., in the emotions of an occurrent and a dispositional, the most importance is to make the students allowing the power of researching the rational core of the emotions. And in this cases, the permissible atmosphere is important in the classroom, too.
참고문헌 (25)
- 김재식, "초등도덕과교육의 이해" (2009), 울력출판사
- 김태오, "실사구시 교육철학" (2007), 양서원
- 문성화, "교육과 선 그리고 아름다움의 관계 - 칸트의 『판단력 비판』을 중심으로", 교육철학, (37), pp.79~103 (2009), 한국교육철학회
- 박균섭, "교육학의 이해" (2011), 정민사
- 윤영순, "듀이의 “질성적 전체” 개념에서 본 교과의 의미", 교육철학, (41), pp.349~378 (2010), 한국교육철학회
- 임태평, "쉴러의 미학과 인간성의 미적인 교육", 교육철학, (40), pp.151~178 (2010), 한국교육철학회
- 정호표, "정서의 접근유형과 그 교육적 의의", 교육철학, (21) (2002), 한국교육철학회
- 정호표, "현대교육철학" (2001), 교육과학사
- 조난심, "도덕교육의 목적으로서의 자율성:그 의미와 한계", 박사, pp.1991
- 조용기, "교육의 쓸모" (2005), 교육과학사
- 한명희, "교육의 철학적 이해" (2005), 문음사
- Cuypers.S.E, "Is Personal Autonomy the First Principle of Education? Journal of Philosophy of Education", The philosophy of education society of Great Britain, 26(1), pp.5~17 (1992)
- Dewey.J, "Art as Experience" (1934), Berkley Publshing Group
- Eaton. J, "감성의 힘" (2003), 이 지북
- Eisner.E.W, "The Art of Educational Evaluation (a personal view). Printed in Great Britain" (1985), Basingstoke
- Eisner.E.W, "What artistically crafted research can help us understand about schools. The Kind of Schools We Need", pp.149~154 (1998), Acid-free paper Co
- Hill.T.E, "Autonomy and self-respect.New" (1991), Cambridge University Press
- Kagan.J, "What is Emotion" (2007), 아카넷
- Noddings.N, "배려" (1984), 도서출판 천지
- Noddings.N, "배려교육론" (2002), 다른 우리
- Rich.J.M, "Autonomy and the Purpose of Schooling", Educational Philosophy and Theory, 18(2), pp.34~40 (1986), New South Wales University Press
- Peters.R.S, "Education and the educated man. Education and the development of reason", pp.3~18 (1972), Routledge and K. Paul
- Peters.R.S, "The education of the emotions. Philosophy of Education", pp.179~194 (1998), Printed TJ International Ltd in Great Britain
- Pitcher.G, "Emotion. Education and the development of reason", pp.368~388 (1972), Routledge & K. Paul
- Snook.I, "Indoctrination and Intentions. Philosophy of Education", pp.308~320 (1998), London & New York