리쾨르 해석학과 듀이 경험론의 간주관성에 대한 교육적 고찰
The Educational Intersubjective Considerations of the Ricoeur’s Analysis and the Dewey’s Experience theory as ‘Creative Harmony’
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The Dewey’s experience theory put reason of human thinking operation as a prominent position and suggested a new direction for dualism which strictly separated human mentality and body. According to Dewey, true mentality is consistent interaction of human beings with environment and when thinking and body becomes united, it can be acquired. In addition, our life is the whole course of experiences and through this life and experiences, mentality is revealed and realized. Namely, life itself is a course of mental investigation and the essence of investigation is an integrated shape of reason and behavior of our recognition and will. Ricoeur reestablished interpretation as a creative course to form a new ego distinguished from the present appearance through the text of a direct medium by human beings and suggested a new direction for the existing analysis. The traditional analysis directly intervenes given data and shows the objective and passive aspect to derive only its meaning. However, Ricoeur’s analysis contains the existential color for the course of self-understanding. When our life is considered to be consistent communication of conversation and the whole course through experiential recomposition, there must exist a responsive factor between the Ricoeur’s analytic viewpoint and the Dewey’s experience theory. This paper clarifies the Ricoeur’s analysis and the Dewey’s experience theory as ‘creative harmony’ in the inter-subjective aspect and analyzes mutual core notions that recognition and will of the main body in life is experience and interpretation. It emphasizes how the theories of Dewey and Ricoeur prepare for a point of contact in some parts and what undertone they draw pedagogically through this. We could understand that experience and interpretation are the crystal of investigation in which thinking and behavior, namely recognition and will are dissolved. In addition, investigation is a new discovery of ego and is the recovery of the main body. In this aspect, The inter-subjective point of contact of the Ricoeur’s analysis and the Dewey’s experience theory under the maximization of economic efficiency, can operates as a basis of an alternative thinking to overcome the educational blind point of the modern education which the educational subjects are alienated in and which takes educational only a means.
Abstract
The Dewey’s experience theory put reason of human thinking operation as a prominent position and suggested a new direction for dualism which strictly separated human mentality and body. According to Dewey, true mentality is consistent interaction of human beings with environment and when thinking and body becomes united, it can be acquired. In addition, our life is the whole course of experiences and through this life and experiences, mentality is revealed and realized. Namely, life itself is a course of mental investigation and the essence of investigation is an integrated shape of reason and behavior of our recognition and will. Ricoeur reestablished interpretation as a creative course to form a new ego distinguished from the present appearance through the text of a direct medium by human beings and suggested a new direction for the existing analysis. The traditional analysis directly intervenes given data and shows the objective and passive aspect to derive only its meaning. However, Ricoeur’s analysis contains the existential color for the course of self-understanding. When our life is considered to be consistent communication of conversation and the whole course through experiential recomposition, there must exist a responsive factor between the Ricoeur’s analytic viewpoint and the Dewey’s experience theory. This paper clarifies the Ricoeur’s analysis and the Dewey’s experience theory as ‘creative harmony’ in the inter-subjective aspect and analyzes mutual core notions that recognition and will of the main body in life is experience and interpretation. It emphasizes how the theories of Dewey and Ricoeur prepare for a point of contact in some parts and what undertone they draw pedagogically through this. We could understand that experience and interpretation are the crystal of investigation in which thinking and behavior, namely recognition and will are dissolved. In addition, investigation is a new discovery of ego and is the recovery of the main body. In this aspect, The inter-subjective point of contact of the Ricoeur’s analysis and the Dewey’s experience theory under the maximization of economic efficiency, can operates as a basis of an alternative thinking to overcome the educational blind point of the modern education which the educational subjects are alienated in and which takes educational only a means.
참고문헌 (40)
- 김동식, "듀이-경험과 자연" (2005), 울산대학교 출판부
- 김무길, "존 듀이의 교호작용과 교육론" (2005), 원미사
- 노진호, "존 듀이의 교육이론:반성적 사고와 교육" (1996), 문음사
- 목영해, "후현대주의 교육학" (1994), 교육과학사
- 박준영, "John Dewey의 지성중심교육철학" (1995), 경성대학교출판부
- 송도선, "존 듀이의 경험교육론" (2009), 문음사
- 손승남, "교육해석학" (2001), 교육과학사
- 서상문, "Ricoeur 전유(轉有)의 교육해석학적 함의와 도덕교육", 교육철학, (40), pp.103~149 (2010), 한국교육철학회
- 서상문, "Ricoeur의 해석학적 상징과 교육", 교육철학, (42), pp.83~122 (2010), 한국교육철학회
- 윤성우, "폴 리쾨르의 철학" (2004), 철학과 현실사
- 이지중, "교육과 언어의 성격-유식학의 관점을 중심으로" (2004), 문음사
- 이대성, "진리에 관한 다학제적 성찰-폴 리쾨르의 해석학을 중심 으로" (2009), 연세대학교 출판부
- 이기언, "폴 리쾨르 : 해석학과 자기 이해", 불어불문학연구, (79), pp.401~439 (2009), 한국불어불문학회
- 이상오, "교육해석학-이론과 적용" (2008), 학지사
- 정기철, "뽈 리쾨르의 해석학적 현상학에 대한 연구", 석사, pp.1988
- 정기철, "리쾨르의 은유 이론. 현대철학과 해석 1-존재해석과 신학·예술", pp.114~131 (1994), 지평문화사
- 정덕희, "듀이의 교육철학" (1997), 문음사
- 양황승, "폴 리쾨르 해석학의 전개에 대한 연구", 석사, pp.1996
- 조영일, "John Dwey의 교육이론에서의 인식과 의지의 문제", 박사, pp.1988
- W. Cooney, "From Plato to Piaget:The Greatest Educational Theories From Across the Centuries and Around the World.University Press of America" (1993), University Press of America
- Ricoeur,P, "Le Conflict des interpretation" (1969), Seuil
- Ricoeur, P, "해석이론" (1996), 서광사
- Ricoeur, P, "Hermeneutics and the Critique of Ideology. Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences" (1981), Cambridge Univ
- Ricoeur, P, "텍스트에서 행동으로" (2002), 아카넷
- Birus,H, "Hermeneutische positionen. Shleiermacher, Dilthey, Heidegger, Gadamer" (1982), Vandenboeck & Ruprecht
- Dewey,J, "Democracy and Education" (1916), The Macmillan Company
- Dewey,J, "How We Think" (1910), D.C. Heath & CO
- Dewey,J, "Experience and Nature. In John Dewey : The Later Works" (1925), Southern Illinois University Press
- Dewey,J, "Experience and Education" (1938), The Macmillan Company
- Dewey,J, "Logic : The Theory of Inquiry" (1938), Henrt Holt & Company
- Dewey,J, "From Absolutism to Experimentalism. In John Dewey : The Later Works", pp.69~83 (1930), Southern Illinois University Press
- Dewey,J, "Logic : The Theory of Inquiry, in The Later Works", pp.1925~1953 (1938), Southern Illinois University Press
- Bernstein, "듀이 철학 입문" (1995), 예전사
- 이유선, "철학의 재구성" (2010), 아카넷
- Dewey, J, "민주주의와 교육" (1987), 교육과학사
- Dewey, J, "경험과 자연" (1982), 계명대학교 출판부
- Noddings, N, "넬 나딩스의 교육철학 2판" (2006), 아카데미프레스
- Kneller, G. F, "현대교육사상" (1987), 서광사
- 한상진, "인간학적 교육학" (2006), 양서원
- Madan, Sarup, "데리다와 푸꼬, 그리고 포스트모더니즘" (1992), 인간사랑
