교육적 이상과 학교교육 실제의 괴리에 대한 비판적 고찰: 현직 교사의 관점에서
Critical Thinking to the Gap between Educational Ideal and Reality - at the Point of current Teacher’s View -
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this paper is to analyse what make teachers feel the gap between educational ideal and reality and to propose solutions. The elements to feel the gap between educational ideal and reality are followings. First, the problems of social awareness as an official not as an educator to teachers. Second, the problems of age and promotion of teachers. Third, the problems of policies because of temporary educational events and populism. Fourth, the problems of unreasonable demands to educational achievements during short periods. So social awareness that seeing teacher as only an official has to be eradicated. It has no value for education to make teachers conduct too many official documents. And when teachers have pride to their minds at retirement under the age limit, that society must be really sound society. Our society and national bureaus have to make teachers concentrate on education only. And educational philosophers help current teachers through the severe criticisms.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to analyse what make teachers feel the gap between educational ideal and reality and to propose solutions. The elements to feel the gap between educational ideal and reality are followings. First, the problems of social awareness as an official not as an educator to teachers. Second, the problems of age and promotion of teachers. Third, the problems of policies because of temporary educational events and populism. Fourth, the problems of unreasonable demands to educational achievements during short periods. So social awareness that seeing teacher as only an official has to be eradicated. It has no value for education to make teachers conduct too many official documents. And when teachers have pride to their minds at retirement under the age limit, that society must be really sound society. Our society and national bureaus have to make teachers concentrate on education only. And educational philosophers help current teachers through the severe criticisms.
참고문헌 (14)
- 김선구, "가르치는 일의 성격과 '교과교육학적 지식'의 한계", 교육철학, (37), pp.1~23 (2009), 한국교육철학회
- 신득렬, "교사와 교육철학", 교육철학, (35), pp.97~120 (2008), 한국교육철학회
- 안경수, "교육목적으로서의 자율성과 정서성의 통합에 대한 정당화", 박사, 교육학과 교육철학및사학전공, pp.2012
- 이병승, "훌륭한 교사의 철학적 자질 탐색", 교육철학, (36), pp.117~143 (2008), 한국교육철학회
- 이현민, "학교 교육 현실과 교사의 철학", 교육철학, (35), pp.121~149 (2008), 한국교육철학회
- 진미숙, "학교교육의 재개념화 : 선발체제를 중심으로", 교육철학, (42), pp.213~238 (2010), 한국교육철학회
- 최석민, "고등사고력 교육의 조건: 교사의 지성", 교육철학, (39), pp.299~324 (2009), 한국교육철학회
- Cuypers, S. E., "Is Personal Autonomy the first Principle of Education?", Journal of Philosophy of Education, 26(1), pp.5~17 (1992), The Philosophy of Education Society
- Dearden, R. F., "Happiness and Education, In Education and the Development of Reason", pp.95~112 (1972), Routledge and K. Paul
- Dearden, R. F., "Competition in Education, In Philosophy of Education, Vol. 4", pp.331~341 (1998), Routledge and K. Paul
- Dewey, J., "Democracy and Education" (2009), Merchant Books
- Eisner, E. W., "The Educational Imagination" (1994), Macmillan College Publishing Company
- Peters, R. S., "Education and the educated Man, In Education and the Development of Reason", pp.3~18 (1972)
- Snook, I., "Indoctrination and Intentions", Philosophy of Education, 4, pp.308~320 (1998)