본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

학봉 김성일의 교육방법론

Educational Methodology of Hakbong Kim, Seong-Il

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류교육학

초록

The current study generalized Hakbong's educational methodology under three categories of the view point of human and educational methodology can be summarized into the following three points. First of all, he has diversity in width embracing moral philosophies including the view point of human, theory of academy, the theory of cultivation, the theory of economy, etc. of Neo-confucianism. At the same time, he recognizes Yang-Ming Philosophy critically and interpreted it in own unique way. In particular, his educational thought focuses on the theory of economy most. From the above points, his unique academic trend is confirmed that is distinguished from other academic traditions within Toigye Academic Community which inclined toward theory of academy and the theory of cultivation of Neo-confucianism. Secondly, he contains creativity of strict positivity and sharp penetration. He emphasized ‘yehak’ even for interpretation of the scriptures, so he is not restricted by the frame of Neo-confucianism. Therefore, the fact that he reviewed from positive interests not being addicted to ideological speculation of Neo-confucianism presents that his educational thoughts do not incline toward normative value consciousness of moral philosophy-Neo-confucianism. Thirdly, he has practical academic trend. He gave priority to human affairs(over the principle of heaven, and put emphasis on practicality for deciding issues brought out from human affairs. He is connected with the realist ideology at the beginning of the 17th century at this point, and his educational thoughts that presents his realist thoughts sprouted from moral science showed distinctive characteristics within academic development of Toigye Academic Community. This aspect can be considered as the clearest expression of his view on the time

Abstract

The current study generalized Hakbong's educational methodology under three categories of the view point of human and educational methodology can be summarized into the following three points. First of all, he has diversity in width embracing moral philosophies including the view point of human, theory of academy, the theory of cultivation, the theory of economy, etc. of Neo-confucianism. At the same time, he recognizes Yang-Ming Philosophy critically and interpreted it in own unique way. In particular, his educational thought focuses on the theory of economy most. From the above points, his unique academic trend is confirmed that is distinguished from other academic traditions within Toigye Academic Community which inclined toward theory of academy and the theory of cultivation of Neo-confucianism. Secondly, he contains creativity of strict positivity and sharp penetration. He emphasized ‘yehak’ even for interpretation of the scriptures, so he is not restricted by the frame of Neo-confucianism. Therefore, the fact that he reviewed from positive interests not being addicted to ideological speculation of Neo-confucianism presents that his educational thoughts do not incline toward normative value consciousness of moral philosophy-Neo-confucianism. Thirdly, he has practical academic trend. He gave priority to human affairs(over the principle of heaven, and put emphasis on practicality for deciding issues brought out from human affairs. He is connected with the realist ideology at the beginning of the 17th century at this point, and his educational thoughts that presents his realist thoughts sprouted from moral science showed distinctive characteristics within academic development of Toigye Academic Community. This aspect can be considered as the clearest expression of his view on the time

참고문헌 (41)

  1. "鶴峰集, 續集, 附錄,? 韓國文集總刊 48", ~
  2. "鶴峰全書", ~
  3. "朝鮮王朝實錄", ~
  4. "性理大全", ~
  5. "二程全書", ~
  6. "大學", ~
  7. "論語", ~
  8. "孟子", ~
  9. "孟子或問", ~
  10. "朱子大全", ~
  11. "朱子語類", ~
  12. "朱子全書", ~
  13. "中庸", ~
  14. "中庸章句", ~
  15. 경북대학교퇴계연구소, "퇴계문하 6철의 삶과 사상" (1999), 예문서원
  16. 권오영, "학봉 김성일과 안동지역의 퇴계학맥", 한국의 철학, 28, pp.35~58 (2000), 경북대학교 퇴계연구소
  17. 금장태, "퇴계학파와 리철학의 전개" (2000), 서울대학교출판부
  18. 금장태, "퇴계학파의 사상" (1996), 집문당
  19. 민족과 사상연구회, "사단칠정론" (1992), 서광사
  20. 박종홍, "한국사상사논고-유학편" (1974), 서문당
  21. 배종호, "한국유학사" (1974), 연세대학교출판부
  22. 성균관대학교 유학과 교재편찬위원회, "유학사상" (2003), 성균관대학교 출판부
  23. 오석원, "한국 도학파의 의리사상" (2005), 성균관대학교 출판부
  24. 유인희, "주자학과 중국철학" (1980), 범지사
  25. 윤사순, "한국유학사상론" (1986), 열음사
  26. 이동기, "퇴계학파의 교육사상 연구-월천과 학봉을 중심으로-", 동아인문, 10, pp.492~515 (2006), 동아인문학회
  27. 이병휴, "학봉 김성일의 시대와 그의 현실대응", 민족문화, 25, pp.35~74 (2002), 민족문화추진회
  28. 이수건, "영남사림파의 형성" (1984), 영남대학교 출판부
  29. 정순목, "퇴계의 교육철학" (1987), 지식산업사
  30. 정순목, "옛 선비교육의 길" (1992), 문음사
  31. 정낙찬, "퇴계의 경의 교육방법론", 교육철학, 17, pp.251~272 (1999), 한국교철학회
  32. 정낙찬, "남명 교육방법론의 현대 교육적 의미", 남명학연구논총, 11, pp.143~190 (2002), 남명학연구원
  33. 정낙찬, "조선 초기 관학파의 교육방법론", 교육철학, (28), pp.19~48 (2005), 한국교육철학회
  34. 정낙찬, "하서 김인후의 교육방법론", 교육철학, (29), pp.95~118 (2006), 한국교육철학회
  35. 정낙찬, "여헌 장현광의 교육사상", 교육철학, 30, pp.163~194 (2007), 한국교육철학회
  36. 정낙찬, "서애 유성룡의 교육방법론", 교육철학, (34), pp.391~424 (2008), 한국교육철학회
  37. 한국교육학회, "인성교육" (1998), 문음사
  38. 한국철학회, "한국철학사(중)" (1987), 동명사
  39. 한국사상사연구회, "조선유학의 학파들" (1996), 예문서원
  40. 한국사상사연구회, "조선유학의 개념들" (2002), 예문서원
  41. 황금중, "조선시대 교육의 성리학적 전개 양상에 대한 연구 현황 및 과제", 한국교육사학, 29(1), pp.223~264 (2007), 한국교육사학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)