본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

혜강 사상의 생태주의적 교육원리

Principles of Educational Ecology in Hyegang's Thought

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류교육학

초록

The purpose of this study is to elucidate the ecological meaning of Hyegang Choe Han-gi’s(1803-1877) thought and its application to educational principles. The results can be summarized as follows. At the outset, it should be noted that there are three perspectives on ecology in Korean traditional thought. First, there is the understanding that all the myriad beings and things are fundamentally equal. Second, traditionally people thought reflectively on humanity and civilization from the standpoint of all beings. And third, they would have argued that the natural way and human life are unified. Next, we investigated the ecological worldview in Hyegang’s thought. Although nature(the way of Heaven) and man(the way of man) have an organic relationship, fundamentallythey are separate. Hyegang’s worldview is mechanistic in that man and all things are alike in their matter(gi) and in their function. In this case, man is not the only subject capable of cognition and neither is he a chosen being. All beings possess equivalent responsibility and rights before nature’s dispensation. Finally, from the viewpoint of ecological education, we have understood Hyegang’s thought through the principles of ‘great equality’ (daedong) and ‘communication’(sotong). His ‘great equality’ philosophy is an act of benevolence towards man and all beings. In an era of ecological crises, the educational principle of ‘great equality’ is a more appropriate ideology than holistic or humanitarian education. As for his ‘communication’ theory, it is a matter of the exchange of gi between man and man, man and nature. The educational principle of ‘communication’ restores the relation of equality and peace between the self and the other.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to elucidate the ecological meaning of Hyegang Choe Han-gi’s(1803-1877) thought and its application to educational principles. The results can be summarized as follows. At the outset, it should be noted that there are three perspectives on ecology in Korean traditional thought. First, there is the understanding that all the myriad beings and things are fundamentally equal. Second, traditionally people thought reflectively on humanity and civilization from the standpoint of all beings. And third, they would have argued that the natural way and human life are unified. Next, we investigated the ecological worldview in Hyegang’s thought. Although nature(the way of Heaven) and man(the way of man) have an organic relationship, fundamentallythey are separate. Hyegang’s worldview is mechanistic in that man and all things are alike in their matter(gi) and in their function. In this case, man is not the only subject capable of cognition and neither is he a chosen being. All beings possess equivalent responsibility and rights before nature’s dispensation. Finally, from the viewpoint of ecological education, we have understood Hyegang’s thought through the principles of ‘great equality’ (daedong) and ‘communication’(sotong). His ‘great equality’ philosophy is an act of benevolence towards man and all beings. In an era of ecological crises, the educational principle of ‘great equality’ is a more appropriate ideology than holistic or humanitarian education. As for his ‘communication’ theory, it is a matter of the exchange of gi between man and man, man and nature. The educational principle of ‘communication’ restores the relation of equality and peace between the self and the other.

참고문헌 (35)

  1. "『老子』, 『莊子』, 『周易』, 『張子全書』, 『十三經注疏』, 『天符經』", ~
  2. 강승숙, "행복한 교실" (2003), 보리
  3. 김용민, "생태문학:대안 사회를 위한 꿈" (2003), 책세상
  4. 김용헌, "최한기의 자연관", 동양철학연구 (1998), 동양철학연구회
  5. 김지하, "생명과 평화의 길" (2005), 문학과지성사
  6. 김태오, "혜강 최한기의 운화적 교육론", 교육철학, 34(34), pp.85~114 (2008), 한국교육철학회
  7. 노상우, "생태적 담론과 21세기 한국 교육", 2000년 춘계 학술대회 논문집 (2000), 한국교육학회
  8. 문순홍, "생태학의 담론" (2006), 아프케
  9. 박이문, "문명의 위기와 문화의 전환 : 생태학적 세계관을 위하여" (1996), 민음사
  10. 박희병, "崔漢綺 사상에 있어서 自然과 人爲의 관계", 대동문화연구, 42, pp.117~136 (2003), 대동문화연구원
  11. 박희병, "운화와 근대" (2003), 돌베개
  12. 박희병, "한국의 생태사상" (2003), 돌베개
  13. 서욱수, "혜강 최한기의 세계인식" (2005), 소강
  14. 심광현, "프랙탈. 현실문화연구", ~ (2005)
  15. 안이정, "원불교교전해의" (1997), 원불교출판사
  16. 예철해, "불교 생태학의 주요 원리를 실천하기 위한 생태교육의 방향", 종교교육학연구, 23, pp.151~172 (2006), 한국종교교육학회
  17. 유영만, "지식생태학과 교육공학: 생태학적 교육공학의 정초마련을 위한 시론적 탐색", 교육공학연구, 21(1), pp.159~194 (2005), 한국교육공학회
  18. 이도원, "한국의 전통생태학" (2004), 사이언스북스
  19. 이동희, "한국 성리학의 자연철학적 시사", 동양철학, 13, pp.34~35 (2000), 한국동양철학회
  20. 이병승, "환경교육의 철학", 교육사상연구, 10, pp.115~139 (2001), 한국교육사상연구회
  21. 이은정, "교육생태학의 성립가능성 연구", 석사, 교육학과, pp.1999
  22. 이종호, "퇴계 이황의 유기체 우주론과 생태사상", 한국한문학연구, (33), pp.33~65 (2004), 한국한문학회
  23. 임재택, "생태유아교육개론" (2005), 양서원
  24. 정호표, "신교육학개론" (2002), 교육과학사
  25. 조현규, "동양윤리사상의 이해" (2002), 새문사
  26. 崔英辰,, "崔漢綺 運化論의 생태학적 해석", 대동문화연구, 11(45), pp.119~139 (2004), 대동문화연구원
  27. 최한기, "기측체의 Ⅰ-Ⅱ. 민족문화추진회. 고려", ~ (1979)
  28. 최한기, "국역 인정 Ⅰ- Ⅳ. 민족문화문고간행회", ~ (1982)
  29. 최한기, "기학 : 19세기 한 조선인의 우주론" (2004), 통나무
  30. 최한기, "신기통" (2006), 여강출판사
  31. 허재욱, "교육법신론" (1998), 형설출판사
  32. H.Norberg-Hodge, "Ancient Future: Learning from Ladarkh. Reder" (1992), 녹색평론사
  33. Merchant,C., "The Death of Nature" (1990), Harper
  34. Myerson,G., "생태학과 포스트모더니티의 종말" (2003), 이제이북스
  35. Patterson,C.H., "Humanistic Education" (1973), Prentice-Hall, Inc

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)