본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

CONFUCIANISM, KOREAN CONFUCIANISM AND ECOLOGICAL DISCOURSE

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

Many scholars have sought to find the fundamental causes of the current environmental and ecological crisis in the anthropocentric view of nature and the mechanical view of the world. In this regard, there has been a gradual increase in the number of scholars who, during the process of searching for alternative views of nature and the world, have paid attention to Asian philosophies. In particular, attention has been paid to the view of nature rooted in the unity of heaven and man, organic view of nature, and life-ism-based view of the world. Certain studies have dealt with the philosophies of Korean Confucian scholars such as Yi Hwang, Yi Yi, Hong Taeyong, and Ch’oe Han’gi from the standpoint of environmental ecology. However, the number of such studies remains limited, and the approach employed in such studies has been restricted to the general characteristics of Confucian thought. However, the claim that Confucian thought is fundamentally limited as an anthropocentric ethical philosophy is one that is difficult to refute. The analysis of the ecological discourses within Confucianism and Korean Confucianism should not be limited to the development of alternative ecological thought, but also focus on practical applications such as the establishment of ecological politics and economics, as well as the abstinence of desire.

Abstract

Many scholars have sought to find the fundamental causes of the current environmental and ecological crisis in the anthropocentric view of nature and the mechanical view of the world. In this regard, there has been a gradual increase in the number of scholars who, during the process of searching for alternative views of nature and the world, have paid attention to Asian philosophies. In particular, attention has been paid to the view of nature rooted in the unity of heaven and man, organic view of nature, and life-ism-based view of the world. Certain studies have dealt with the philosophies of Korean Confucian scholars such as Yi Hwang, Yi Yi, Hong Taeyong, and Ch’oe Han’gi from the standpoint of environmental ecology. However, the number of such studies remains limited, and the approach employed in such studies has been restricted to the general characteristics of Confucian thought. However, the claim that Confucian thought is fundamentally limited as an anthropocentric ethical philosophy is one that is difficult to refute. The analysis of the ecological discourses within Confucianism and Korean Confucianism should not be limited to the development of alternative ecological thought, but also focus on practical applications such as the establishment of ecological politics and economics, as well as the abstinence of desire.

참고문헌 (43)

  1. "Sol", 1998
  2. "T’oegye hakpo", 2001, ~, pp.The T’oegyeStudies Institute
  3. "Tamnon 201", 2010, 201~, pp.The Korean Association of Socio-Historical Studies
  4. "Dongyeon", 2003
  5. (East Asian Forum on Cultural Diversity), "1998"
  6. "Tongyang ch’ŏrhak", 2000, 13~, pp.The Society for AsianPhilosophy in Korea
  7. MaryEvelyn Tucker, "Confucianism and Ecology: The Interrelation of Heaven, Earth, and Humans" (1998), Harvard University Press
  8. "Ch’ŏrhakkwa hyŏnsilsa", 1997
  9. Han Myŏnhŭi, (2009), Philosophy and Reality Publishing
  10. "Acanet", 2001
  11. "Yangming Study (Korean Association of YangmingStudy)", 2001, ~
  12. "Han’gukhak nonjip (Academia Koreana)", 2008, ~
  13. "Tongyang ch’ŏrhak (The Society for Asian Philosophy in Korea)", 2000, ~
  14. Joseph R. Desjardins, (1999), Chajak namu
  15. "Tongyang ch’ŏrhak (The Society for Asian Philosophy in Korea)", 2000, ~
  16. "Chungguk hakpo", ~
  17. Kim Myŏngsik, (2002), Pumyangsa
  18. "Tongyang ch’ŏrhak(The Society for Asian Philosophy in Korea)", 1999, ~
  19. "Pŏmhan ch’ŏrhak(Bumhan Philosophy Association)", 2003, ~
  20. 김태오, "혜강 사상의 생태주의적 교육원리", 교육철학, 35(35), pp.261~284 (2008), 한국교육철학회
  21. 김태오, "혜강의 대동론과 소통론 그리고 교육생태학", 교육철학, 41(41), pp.243~268 (2010), 한국교육철학회
  22. Ku Sŭnghoe, "Ecophilosophy" (1995), Saegil
  23. Ku Sŭnghoe, (2001), Dongguk University Press
  24. (The Society for Asian Philosophy inKorea), "1994", ~
  25. "1996", ~
  26. "Tongyang ch’ŏrhak (The Society for Asian Philosophy in Korea)", 2000, ~
  27. Lee Jin-Woo, (1998), Munye Publishing
  28. Mun Sunhong, (1992), Nara sarang
  29. Murray Bookchin, (1999), Sol
  30. Pak Imun, (1996), Minumsa
  31. Pak Imun, (1998), Dangdae
  32. Pak Imun, (2002), Midas Books
  33. Peter Singer, (1999), InganSarang
  34. "Noksaek p’yŏngnon", 1994, ~
  35. Pak Hŭibyŏng, (1999), Tolbegae
  36. Reiner Grundmann, (1995), Dongnyeok
  37. Ro Yŏngch’an, (1998), HarvardUniversity Press
  38. Tu Weiming, (1998), Harvard Univerdity Press
  39. (Society ofKorean Literature in Hanmun), "2004"
  40. "Chunggukhak nonch’ong (Chinese Studies Institute,Korea University)", 1996, ~
  41. "Tongyang ch’ŏrhak (TheSociety for Asian Philosophy in Korea)", 2000, ~
  42. "Yulgoksasang yŏn’gu (Association of Yulgok Study)", 2001, ~
  43. (2006), Cheonggye

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)