구성주의와 포스트모더니즘의 지식론과 교육
The Comparison between Constructivism & Postmodernism‘s Theory of Knowledge and It‘s Implications of Education
0
조회
0
다운로드
8
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to compare between theory of knowledge of constructivism and postmodernism and to discuss education of two theories based on the result. The result of this study insists constructive theory of knowledge to consider characteristics and rigidity of conveying method of objective theory of knowledge as well as situationality and contextualism of knowledge. It also insisted that post modernism theory of knowledge emphasizes the role of language game in knowledge construction and standards of each game holds incommensurability. Therefore, knowledge of which postmodernism seeks is something that recognizes differences among rules of each game and denies foundationalism view of knowledge. Comparison between two theories based on the discussion of theories resulted a discussion about common features and differences. Both theories supported situational and contextual access of knowledge and need of considering social and cultural aspects of utilizing discourses in a macroscopic. However they showed differences in important problems such as “do two theories approve aspects of the traditional education?" or "do they deny the traditional theory itself?" in a microscopic view. Constructivism education can be comprehended as a theory that recognizes significance of traditional education and tries to improve mistaken methodology. On the contrary, postmodern education suggests a new education that completely denies the traditional education. Education philosophical implication of this study is to assist use of definitions and increased accuracy of analyzing meanings for further studies similar to this study by considering macroscopic common features and microscopic differences of two theories suggested above.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to compare between theory of knowledge of constructivism and postmodernism and to discuss education of two theories based on the result. The result of this study insists constructive theory of knowledge to consider characteristics and rigidity of conveying method of objective theory of knowledge as well as situationality and contextualism of knowledge. It also insisted that post modernism theory of knowledge emphasizes the role of language game in knowledge construction and standards of each game holds incommensurability. Therefore, knowledge of which postmodernism seeks is something that recognizes differences among rules of each game and denies foundationalism view of knowledge. Comparison between two theories based on the discussion of theories resulted a discussion about common features and differences. Both theories supported situational and contextual access of knowledge and need of considering social and cultural aspects of utilizing discourses in a macroscopic. However they showed differences in important problems such as “do two theories approve aspects of the traditional education?" or "do they deny the traditional theory itself?" in a microscopic view. Constructivism education can be comprehended as a theory that recognizes significance of traditional education and tries to improve mistaken methodology. On the contrary, postmodern education suggests a new education that completely denies the traditional education. Education philosophical implication of this study is to assist use of definitions and increased accuracy of analyzing meanings for further studies similar to this study by considering macroscopic common features and microscopic differences of two theories suggested above.
참고문헌 (29)
- 강사채, "대화의 교육적 의미-하버마스와 구성주의를 중심으로-", 교육의 이론과 실천, 11(2), pp.1~23 (2006)
- 권낙원, "학교중심 교육과정 개발의 의의: 구성주의적 관점", 학습자중심교과교육연구, (4), pp.167~184 (2002), 학습자중심교과교육학회
- 곽영순, "구성주의 인식론의 이론적 배경", 한국지구과학연구, 22(5), pp.427~447 (2001)
- 김무길, "구성주의와 듀이 지식론의 관련성: 재해석", 교육철학연구, (34), pp.23~43 (2005), 한국교육철학학회
- 김무길, "듀이의 흥미 개념 재이해와 그 교육적 함의", 교육철학연구, (42), pp.7~28 (2008), 한국교육철학학회
- 김재건, "듀이 경험론의 재고찰: 구성주의 관점에 관련하여", 교육과정연구, 20(1), pp.75~95 (2002), 한국교육과정학회
- 나귀옥, "구성주의 유아교육에서 테크놀로지의 역할", 순천향 인문과학 논총, 20, pp.69~87 (2007)
- 목영해, "구성주의와 제7차 교육과정의 관련성 연구", 교육철학연구, (29), pp.27~43 (2003), 한국교육철학학회
- 박종국, "아동중심성의 구성주의적 해석", 초등교육연구, 19(1), pp.17~36 (2006), 한국초등교육학회
- 변호승, "구성주의:진리는 사회협상의 산물·학습은 사회적 맥락에서", 교육개발 (1996)
- 양미경, "교육과정의 성격에 대한 구성주의 관섬의 시사", 교육과정연구, 20(1), pp.1~26 (2002), 한국교육과정학회
- 정석환, "포스트모던 숭고의 교육적 의미", 교육철학, (31), pp.91~114 (2007), 한국교육철학회
- 정석환, "포스트모더니즘의 담론과 교육", 교육철학, (35), pp.437~466 (2008), 한국교육철학회
- 정석환, "포스트모더니즘의 차이개념과 그 교육적 의미", 교육사상연구, 22(2), pp.269~289 (2008), 한국교육사상연구회
- 정석환, "자율성의 포스트모던 정당화와 그 교육적 의미", 한국교육학연구, 14(3), pp.5~30 (2008), 안암교육학회
- 정석환, "Vygotsky의 언어발달 이론과 아동교육", 아동교육, 17(4), pp.257~272 (2008), 한국아동교육학회
- 정호표, "지식의 구성적 관점과 학교교육", 교육철학, 18, pp.309~322 (2000)
- 정해진, "경도장애학생을 위한 효과적 교수: 객관주의적 교수와 구성주의적 교수의 통합", 특수아동교육연구, 9(4), pp.103~124 (2007), 한국특수아동학회
- 최정실, "포스트모던 시대의 교사교육에 대한 인식론적 접근", 교육철학, 16, pp.85~100 (1998)
- 황윤한, "제6차 교육과정과 구성주의적 교육", 교육학연구, 33(1), pp.237~252 (1995)
- Cassella, R., "What Are We Doing When We Are ‘Doing’ Cultural Studies in Education-and Why?", Educational Theory, 49(1), pp.107~124 (1999)
- Dewey, J., "Democracy and Education" (1944), Macmillan
- Foucault, M., "Power and Knowedge : Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977" (1980), Pantheon Books
- Glasersfeld, E. von, "Radical constructivism : A way of knowing and learning" (1995), The Falmer Press
- Lyotard, J. F., "The Postmodern Condition : A Report on the Knowledge" (1984), Manchester University Press
- NSTA, "Scope, sequence and coordinarion of secondary school science Vol Ⅱ" (1992), NSTA
- Smeyers, P., "Education and the Educational ProjectⅡ : do we still care about it?", Journal of Philosophy of Education, 29(3), pp.389~411 (1995)
- Thompson, A., "Creating Spaces for Reconstructing Knowledge in Feminist Pedagogy", Educational Theory, 45(2), pp.125~152 (1995)
- Usher, R., "Postmodernism and Education" (1994), RKP