교육의 리듬과 조화정의 상관성 - 새로운 교육모형으로서 생성모형 정립을 위한 시론 -
The Correspondence of Whitehead’s Rhythm with JO-HWA-JUNG(造化定)
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The paper has tried to examine the correspondence of A. N. Whitehead’s Rhythm with JO-HWA-JUNG(造化定) asserted by Soo-Woon (水雲) under the becoming model of education to be proposed. As a groundwork for this, first of all, two main ways of metaphysical thinking have been taken into account, one of which is dubbed as the logic of becoming contrasted with one of being regarded as the traditionally philosophical ways of thinking. The notions of Whitehead’s Rhythm are built on his conceptions of Reason, as one particular feature of also his own ‘process philosophy’. As examined here, three levels of Rhythm in the process of education is correspondent with JO-HWA-JUNG in four dimensions. Before this, the paper has also analysed the notions of JO-HWA-JUNG in the context of Dong-Hak(東學) accepted as the particularly Korean authentic philosophy. The four attempts have been made for the correspondence. The first one is concerned on the micro-relation between the two focused on the linguistic analysis. The second one is on the identification of JO-HWA-JUNG with ‘becoming’. The third one is the identification of it with ‘concrescence’ of Whitehead’s own authentic notion. And the final one is the identification of it with the dynamic and synchronous process from ‘concrescence’ to ‘transition’ through ‘satisfaction’. This process particularly throws light on the new notion of becoming model of education which we eventually construct.
Abstract
The paper has tried to examine the correspondence of A. N. Whitehead’s Rhythm with JO-HWA-JUNG(造化定) asserted by Soo-Woon (水雲) under the becoming model of education to be proposed. As a groundwork for this, first of all, two main ways of metaphysical thinking have been taken into account, one of which is dubbed as the logic of becoming contrasted with one of being regarded as the traditionally philosophical ways of thinking. The notions of Whitehead’s Rhythm are built on his conceptions of Reason, as one particular feature of also his own ‘process philosophy’. As examined here, three levels of Rhythm in the process of education is correspondent with JO-HWA-JUNG in four dimensions. Before this, the paper has also analysed the notions of JO-HWA-JUNG in the context of Dong-Hak(東學) accepted as the particularly Korean authentic philosophy. The four attempts have been made for the correspondence. The first one is concerned on the micro-relation between the two focused on the linguistic analysis. The second one is on the identification of JO-HWA-JUNG with ‘becoming’. The third one is the identification of it with ‘concrescence’ of Whitehead’s own authentic notion. And the final one is the identification of it with the dynamic and synchronous process from ‘concrescence’ to ‘transition’ through ‘satisfaction’. This process particularly throws light on the new notion of becoming model of education which we eventually construct.
참고문헌 (15)
- 김기선, "한글 동경대전" (1991), 자농
- 김상일, "현대물리학과 한국철학" (1991), 고려원
- 김상일, "화이트헤드와 동양철학" (1993), 서광사
- 김상일, "수운과 화이트헤드" (2001), 지식산업사
- 김상일, "역과 탈현대의 논리" (2006), 지식산업사
- 김정래, "교육과 한국불교", pp.11~78 (2017), 학지사
- 김정래, "두 가지 형이상학의 근원과 형성 - 고대 희랍철학을 중심으로 근세 이전까지 -", 교육철학, (70), pp.1~36 (2019), 한국교육철학회[DOI]
- 박재주, "주역의 생성논리와 과정철학" (1999), 청계
- Dewey, J., "민주주의와 교육" (2007), 교육과학사
- Dubasia, N., "The Unity of Everything : A Conversation with David Bohm" (2018), Tredition
- Peters, R. S., "Ethics and Education" (1966), George Allen & Unwin
- Peters, R. S., "권위, 책임, 교육" (2021), 학지사
- Whitehead, A. N., "과정 실재" (1991), 민음사
- Whitehead, A. N., "이성의 기능" (2000), 이문출판사
- Whitehead, A. N., "The Aims of Education and Other Essays", pp.45~ (1932), Earnest Benn
