본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

코로나19 확산에 관한 과학 관련 사회·윤리적 쟁점에 관한 이해관계자 중심의 의사결정 교수학습 활동 개발 및 예비교사 교육에의 적용

Development of a Stakeholder-Based Decision-Making Activity about a Socioscientific Issue Regarding the COVID-19 Crisis and an Application in Preservice Education

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류교육학

초록

This study aimed to develop a stakeholder- based decision-making activity for preservice teachers related to a socioscientific issue about the COVID-19 crisis. The activity was designed based on the existing literature about SSI based education and the COVID-19 crisis, as well as the exploration of participating preservice teachers’ practices. The decision making activity on the elementary school reopening issue is designed for preservice teachers to be positioned as the Ministry of Education, teacher, and parents and centers around deciding elementary schools’ reopening conditions. The activity involves the following five steps: (a) introduction to the SSI and background knowledge regarding the SSI, (b) construction of stakeholder- based decisions, (c) evaluation of the constructed decisions by one another in different stakeholder positions, (d) sophistication of the decisions, (e) discussion among preservice teachers to reach a consensus. The results of this study contribute useful information for science education communities’ efforts to improve learners’ decision-making abilities on SSIs.

Abstract

This study aimed to develop a stakeholder- based decision-making activity for preservice teachers related to a socioscientific issue about the COVID-19 crisis. The activity was designed based on the existing literature about SSI based education and the COVID-19 crisis, as well as the exploration of participating preservice teachers’ practices. The decision making activity on the elementary school reopening issue is designed for preservice teachers to be positioned as the Ministry of Education, teacher, and parents and centers around deciding elementary schools’ reopening conditions. The activity involves the following five steps: (a) introduction to the SSI and background knowledge regarding the SSI, (b) construction of stakeholder- based decisions, (c) evaluation of the constructed decisions by one another in different stakeholder positions, (d) sophistication of the decisions, (e) discussion among preservice teachers to reach a consensus. The results of this study contribute useful information for science education communities’ efforts to improve learners’ decision-making abilities on SSIs.

참고문헌 (17)

  1. 최고은, "의사결정 유형 및 성격특성에 따른 예비생물교사들의 SSI(Socio-Scientific Issues) 토론 담화 차이 분석", 한국과학교육학회지, 38(5), pp.739~751 (2018), 한국과학교육학회[DOI]
  2. Czerniak, C. M., "Relationship between teacher beliefs and science education reform", Journal of Science Teacher Education, 7(4), pp.247~266 (1996)
  3. Gates, B., "Responding to Covid-19-A once-in-acentury pandemic", The New England Journal of Medicine, 382, pp.1677~1679 (2020)
  4. Kilinc, A., "Resistance to dialogic discourse in SSI teaching : The effects of an argumentation-based workshop, teaching practicum, and induction on a preservice science teacher", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(6), pp.764~789 (2017)
  5. 이현주, "집단지성 원리를 적용한 과학관련 사회·윤리적 쟁점 수업 모형의 개발", 한국과학교육학회지, 34(6), pp.523~534 (2014), 한국과학교육학회[DOI]
  6. Lee, Y. C., "Students’ reasoning processes in making decisions about an authentic, local socioscientific issue: Bat conservation", Journal of Biological Education, 44(4), pp.156~165 (2010)
  7. Lee, Y. C., "Students’ reasoning and decision making about a socioscientific issue: A crosscontext comparison", Science Education, 96(5), pp.787~807 (2012)
  8. Liu, S. -Y., "College students’scientific epistemological views and thinking patterns in socioscientific decision making", Science Education, 95(3), pp.497~517 (2010)
  9. Means, M. L., "Who reasons well? Two studies of informal reasoning among children of different grade, ability, and knowledge levels", Cognition and Instruction, 14(2), pp.139~178 (1996)
  10. Science Curriculum, "Ministry of Education", MOE, ~, pp.MOE Notification No. 2015-74 (2015)
  11. Newton, M. H., "Developing socioscientific perspective taking", International Journal of Science Education, 42(8), pp.1302~1319 (2020)
  12. Rundgren, C. -J., "Investigating the intertwinement of knowledge, value, and experience of upper secondary students’ argumentation concerning socioscientific issues", Science & Education, 26, pp.1049~1071 (2016)
  13. Sadler, T. D, "Socio-scientific Issues in the Classroom", pp.355~369 (2011), Springer
  14. Sadler, T. D., "Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues : A critical review of research", Journal of Reearch in Science Teaching, 41(5), pp.513~536 (2004)
  15. Sadler, T. D., "Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socioscientific decision making", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(1), pp.112~138 (2005)
  16. Topçu, M. S., "Turkish preservice science teachers’ informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues and the factors influencing their informal reasoning", Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22(4), pp.313~332 (2011)
  17. Zeidler, D. L., "Beyond STS : A research-based framework for socioscientific issues education", Science Education, 89(3), pp.357~377 (2005)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)