고려 충선왕 ‧ 원 무종의 재정운용 및 ‘정책공유’
Goryeo King Chungseon-wang and Yuan Emperor Wu-tsung, 'Sharing' many policy details in handling monetary difficulties
0
조회
0
다운로드
23
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In the 1300s, Goryeo dynasty and the Mongol Yuan empire were both facing monetary difficulties, and were in dire need of exploring new avenues to increase financial revenue. Both of them were forced to abandon prior policies, take new initiatives in their dealings with tax sources, and aggressively pursue them for taxation. In the process, both King Chungseon-wang and Yuan Emperor Wu-tsung(Qayishan) exhibited policies with either similar appearances in details or at least similar perspectives regarding financial resources. King Chungseon-wang tried to protect commercial transactions in the market by banning other entities' wrongful commandeering of commercial items, by elevating the status of the officials in charge of monitoring market activities and by weakening potential perpetrators by putting them under other offices' jurisdiction. He also initiated government's monopoly on salt, and secured a vast new income. And he actively promoted the policy of manufacturing textile goods to invest them in foreign trades. He also resurrected the Shikmok Dogam office, a council from the Goryeo's past which was in charge of overseeing legal orders and protocol matters, to have it oversee issues related to his revenue-expanding policy. In the end, he initiated a social relief program with huge amount of resources obtained by his policy. At the same time, Emperor Wu-tsung increased certification taxes related to commercial transactions in order to enhance the government's revenue, expanded the government's salt monopoly by ordering more productions throughout various regions of the empire, and wilfully reengaged in Ortaq trades which were frowned upon by former emperor Temur. He also resurrected the Shang-shu Sheng office which had once replaced Chung-shu Sheng(Central Secretariat) during the Qubilai period and oversaw taxation and trades, and he reformed the monetary system, claiming to provide the public with convenient usage of paper money. Chungseon-wang befriended Qayishan and Ayurbarwada(later Jen-tsung) brothers when he was dethroned and staying in Yuan(since 1298 through 1307), and served also as a guide for them. They are known to have been very close to each other. Such relationship would have led to many discussions regarding several aspects of governing, and such exchanges in their youth could have been one of the reasons why both countries came to display a similar series of financial policies in the 1300s, when Chungseon-wang and Qayishan(Wu-tsung) both ascended to the throne. The level of similarity makes one think that both Yuan and Goryeo in this time period actually 'shared' details of certain financial policies, and from such details, we can recognize the nature of companionship that existed between both countries in this time period.
Abstract
In the 1300s, Goryeo dynasty and the Mongol Yuan empire were both facing monetary difficulties, and were in dire need of exploring new avenues to increase financial revenue. Both of them were forced to abandon prior policies, take new initiatives in their dealings with tax sources, and aggressively pursue them for taxation. In the process, both King Chungseon-wang and Yuan Emperor Wu-tsung(Qayishan) exhibited policies with either similar appearances in details or at least similar perspectives regarding financial resources. King Chungseon-wang tried to protect commercial transactions in the market by banning other entities' wrongful commandeering of commercial items, by elevating the status of the officials in charge of monitoring market activities and by weakening potential perpetrators by putting them under other offices' jurisdiction. He also initiated government's monopoly on salt, and secured a vast new income. And he actively promoted the policy of manufacturing textile goods to invest them in foreign trades. He also resurrected the Shikmok Dogam office, a council from the Goryeo's past which was in charge of overseeing legal orders and protocol matters, to have it oversee issues related to his revenue-expanding policy. In the end, he initiated a social relief program with huge amount of resources obtained by his policy. At the same time, Emperor Wu-tsung increased certification taxes related to commercial transactions in order to enhance the government's revenue, expanded the government's salt monopoly by ordering more productions throughout various regions of the empire, and wilfully reengaged in Ortaq trades which were frowned upon by former emperor Temur. He also resurrected the Shang-shu Sheng office which had once replaced Chung-shu Sheng(Central Secretariat) during the Qubilai period and oversaw taxation and trades, and he reformed the monetary system, claiming to provide the public with convenient usage of paper money. Chungseon-wang befriended Qayishan and Ayurbarwada(later Jen-tsung) brothers when he was dethroned and staying in Yuan(since 1298 through 1307), and served also as a guide for them. They are known to have been very close to each other. Such relationship would have led to many discussions regarding several aspects of governing, and such exchanges in their youth could have been one of the reasons why both countries came to display a similar series of financial policies in the 1300s, when Chungseon-wang and Qayishan(Wu-tsung) both ascended to the throne. The level of similarity makes one think that both Yuan and Goryeo in this time period actually 'shared' details of certain financial policies, and from such details, we can recognize the nature of companionship that existed between both countries in this time period.
참고문헌 (44)
- "高麗史", ~
- 고병익, "고려 충선왕의 원 무종옹립, In 동아교섭사의 연구" (1970), 서울대학교 출판부
- 이승한, "고려 忠宣王의 瀋陽王 被封과 在元 政治活動", 전남사학, 2 (1988)
- 김광철, "14세기초 元의 政局동향과 忠宣王의 吐藩 유배", 한국중세사연구, 3 (1996)
- 주채혁, "몽골‧고려사연구의 재검토: 몽골‧고려사의 성격 문제", 國史館論叢, 8 (1989)
- 李康漢, "고려 충선왕의 국정 및 ‘구제’ 복원", 진단학보, (105), pp.73~109 (2008), 진단학회
- 이강한, "고려 충선왕의 정치개혁과 元의 영향", 한국문화, (43), pp.267~300 (2008), 규장각한국학연구원
- 김광철, "고려 충선왕의 현실인식과 대원활동-충렬왕24년 受禪以前을 중심으로", 부산사학, 11 (1986)
- "元史", ~
- 愛宕松男, "元朝稅制考-稅糧と科差について", 東洋史硏究, 23(4) (1968)
- 愛宕松男, "元の中國支配と漢民族社會, In 岩波講座世界歷史9(中世3)" (1969), 岩波書店
- 牧野修二, "元代の稅役用語差發について(上‧下)", 愛媛大学法文学部論集(文学科編), 28 (1994)
- 이개석, "元朝의 南宋倂合과 江南支配의 意味", 경북사학, 21 (1998)
- 박종진, "高麗時代 賦稅制度 硏究" (1993), 서울대학교출판부
- 박경안, "高麗後期 土地制度硏究" (1996), 혜안
- 강순길, "忠宣王의 鹽法改革과 鹽戶", 한국사연구, 48 (1985)
- 권영국, "14세기 榷鹽制의 成立과 運用", 한국사론, 13 (1985), 서울대 국사학과
- 이개석, "14世紀初 元朝支配體制의 再編과 그 背景", 박사, pp.1998
- 宮澤知之, "元朝の商業政策-牙人制度と商稅制度", 史林, 64(2) (1981)
- 植松正, "元初江南における徵稅體制について", 東洋史硏究, 33(1) (1974)
- 植松正, "元朝支配下の江南地域社會, In 宋元時代史の基本問題" (1995), 汲古書院
- 植松正, "元代江南の戶口統計と徵稅請負制度, In 元代江南政治社會史硏究" (1997), 汲古書院
- 김동철, "高麗末의 流通構造와 商人", 부대사학, 9 (1985)
- 陳高華‧, "中國經濟通史:元代經濟卷" (2000), 經濟日報出版社
- 前田直典, "元朝時代における紙幣の價値變動, In 元朝史の硏究" (1973), 東京大學出版部
- 安部健夫, "元代通貨政策の發展, In 元代史の硏究" (1972), 創文社
- "高麗史節要 卷21 忠烈王18年", ~
- 이강한, "13-14世紀 高麗‧元 交易의 展開와 性格", 박사, pp.2007
- 위은숙, "고려후기 직물수공업의 구조변경과 그 성격", 韓國文化硏究, 6 (1993)
- 위은숙, "元干涉期 對元交易-老乞大를 中心으로", 지역과역사, 4 (1997)
- 채웅석, "高麗後期 流通經濟의 조건과 양상, In 中世前期의 身分制와 土地所有-金容燮敎授停年紀念論叢 2" (1997)
- 채웅석, "高麗前期 貨幣流通의 기반", 韓國文化, 9 (1988)
- 村上正二, "元朝の斡脫と泉府司", 東方學報, 13(1) (1942)
- 愛宕松男, "斡脫錢とその背景-13世紀元朝における銀の動向", 東洋史硏究, 31(1‧2) (1973)
- 金光哲, "洪子藩硏究-忠烈王代 政治와 社會의 一側面", 慶南史學, 1 (1984)
- 盧鏞弼, "洪子藩의 便民十八事에 대한 연구", 歷史學報, 102 (1984)
- 이익주, "高麗‧元關係의 構造와 高麗後期 政治體制", 박사, pp.1996
- 박종기, "원간섭기 사회현실과 개혁론의 전개", 역사와 현실, (49), pp.67~97 (2003), 한국역사연구회
- 元代條畫考 4‧5‧6, In 香川大學敎育學部硏究報告 48‧49‧50, "植松正", ~
- 변태섭, "高麗의 式目都監", 역사교육, 15 (1973)
- 김창현, "高麗後期 都評議使司 體制의 성립과 발전", 사학연구, 54 (1997)
- 박재우, "고려 충선왕대 정치운영과 정치세력 동향", 한국사론, 29 (1993)
- 李康漢, "征東行省官 闊里吉思의고려제도 개변 시도", 한국사연구, (139), pp.83~128 (2007), 한국사연구회
- 이강한, "정치도감(整治都監) 운영의 제양상에 대한 재검토", 역사와 현실, (67), pp.171~213 (2008), 한국역사연구회
