본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

『열하일기』의 「제일장관」, 청나라 중화론과 청나라 문화 수용론

A study of 「The argument on one of the grandest sights of Qing dynasty(第一壯觀)」 in 『Yeolha-ilgi(熱河日記, the diary of a journey into Beijing and Chengde)』 of an article about the Sinic civilization of Qing dynasty and the necessity of introducing it

1

조회

0

다운로드

12

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

「The one of the grandest sights of Qing dynasty」 is an article of 『Yeolha-ilgi』 of Yeonam Park Jiwon(燕巖 朴趾源, 1737∼1805)' writing. He argued in it that Chosun Dynasty had to learn Qing dynasty's civilization. Many people of Chosun dynasty looked at Qing dynasty in view of the doctrines of great land to change the barbarians(尊周攘夷), so they believed that Qing dynasty was the barbarians and must be ejected. But He had an different angle on the problem. He thought that Qing dynasty was not barbarous, but had already been civilized. So he argued first that the respect for the Sinic civilization was one thing and the barbarians were another. He believed that even though the doctrines of great land to change the barbarians could be acceptable, but we had not to look at Ming dynasty and Qing dynasty in view of it. It means that he wanted to exchange the context of understanding of Qing dynasty Second, he argued that many evidences could be considered as the opposite evidences to prove the Sinic civilization of Qing dynasty, which was believed to prove Qing dynasty the barbarian. He thought that Qing dynasty was not only a successor of the Sinic civilization formally, but also had carried his civilization into practice essentially. and in addition Its civilization could be usually confirmed in the people's daily life. But He recognized also that all culture of Qing dynasty was not civilized ; Some were civilized, and the others were barbarous, and they was not of the same quality, so could not treat them equally. He wanted to divide them into two classes, and treat them in according to their special quality. One is the doctrine of the civilization of Qing dynasty, and the other is the reinterpretation of the ejection of barbarians. He argued that even though there were some evidences to admit of no excuse in the culture of Qing dynasty, Chosun dynasty should learn and introduce the civilization of Qing dynasty, but should not eject it. He meaned that a concept of the ejection of barbarians had to be changed into a concept of learning of the its civilization. The reinterpretation of the ejection of barbarians presented a new vision out of the argument of dynastic identity. This is just a point he said, namely that Qing dynasty had already been civilized, so Chosun dynasty had to introduce the civilization of Qing dynasty and advance its own self.

Abstract

「The one of the grandest sights of Qing dynasty」 is an article of 『Yeolha-ilgi』 of Yeonam Park Jiwon(燕巖 朴趾源, 1737∼1805)' writing. He argued in it that Chosun Dynasty had to learn Qing dynasty's civilization. Many people of Chosun dynasty looked at Qing dynasty in view of the doctrines of great land to change the barbarians(尊周攘夷), so they believed that Qing dynasty was the barbarians and must be ejected. But He had an different angle on the problem. He thought that Qing dynasty was not barbarous, but had already been civilized. So he argued first that the respect for the Sinic civilization was one thing and the barbarians were another. He believed that even though the doctrines of great land to change the barbarians could be acceptable, but we had not to look at Ming dynasty and Qing dynasty in view of it. It means that he wanted to exchange the context of understanding of Qing dynasty Second, he argued that many evidences could be considered as the opposite evidences to prove the Sinic civilization of Qing dynasty, which was believed to prove Qing dynasty the barbarian. He thought that Qing dynasty was not only a successor of the Sinic civilization formally, but also had carried his civilization into practice essentially. and in addition Its civilization could be usually confirmed in the people's daily life. But He recognized also that all culture of Qing dynasty was not civilized ; Some were civilized, and the others were barbarous, and they was not of the same quality, so could not treat them equally. He wanted to divide them into two classes, and treat them in according to their special quality. One is the doctrine of the civilization of Qing dynasty, and the other is the reinterpretation of the ejection of barbarians. He argued that even though there were some evidences to admit of no excuse in the culture of Qing dynasty, Chosun dynasty should learn and introduce the civilization of Qing dynasty, but should not eject it. He meaned that a concept of the ejection of barbarians had to be changed into a concept of learning of the its civilization. The reinterpretation of the ejection of barbarians presented a new vision out of the argument of dynastic identity. This is just a point he said, namely that Qing dynasty had already been civilized, so Chosun dynasty had to introduce the civilization of Qing dynasty and advance its own self.

참고문헌 (15)

  1. 朴趾源, "馹汛隨筆, In 燕巖集 권12", pp.176~177 (2001), 민족문화추진회
  2. 金明昊, "열하일기연구" (1990), 창작과비평사
  3. 金血祚, "연암 박지원의 사유양식과 산문문학", 박사, pp.1993
  4. 沈慶昊, "燕巖과 魯迅, In 韓國 古文의 理論과 展開", pp.524~525 (1998), 태학사
  5. 李鍾周, "北學派 散文 硏究", 박사, pp.1990
  6. 김동석, "『열하일기』 의 「상기」 에 수용된 화이지분의 비유 - 「의산문답」 을 통하여", 한문학보, 3, pp.303~ (2000), 우리한문학회
  7. 이가원, "열하일기", pp.172~ (1976), 민족문화추진회
  8. 朴趾源, "行在雜錄, In 燕巖集 권13", pp.242~ (2001), 민족문화추진회
  9. 洪起文, "朴燕巖의 藝術과 思想", 한국한문학연구, 11 (1988), 한국한문학연구회
  10. 鄭玉子, "조선후기 조선중화사상연구", pp.17~18 (1998), 일지사
  11. 朴趾源, "關內程史, In 燕巖集 권12", pp.198~ (2001), 민족문화추진회
  12. 박지원, "太學留舘錄, In 燕巖集 권12", pp.211~ (2001), 민족문화추진회
  13. 이현식, "?虎叱?, 청나라 인식에 관한 우언", 한국한문학연구, (35), pp.317~346 (2005), 한국한문학회
  14. 박지원, "北學議序, In 燕巖集 권7", pp.109~ (2001), 민족문화추진회
  15. 이현식, "박지원 산문의 논리와 미학", pp.345~348 (2002), 이회문화사

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)