본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

A Legal Consideration on Port State Jurisdiction and Port State Control in respect of the Prevention of Vessel-Source Marine Pollution

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Traditionally, the responsibility for securing the ships’ safety and the protection of the marine environment falls under a flag state flying its flag under international law. However, with the introduction of FOC regime, flag state control has weakened over the last few decades and this circumstance had resulted in severe maritime accidents and pollution incidents. Thus, the international community have been tried to contribute to the protection of the marine environment through the port states’ regulation under the recognition of that the flag state could be difficult to solve the issue of comprehensive regulation for the prevention and reduction of marine pollution. Under the LOSC, a port state may exercise legislative and enforcement jurisdiction over the ship that violated international rule and standards in their maritime zone and may institute proceedings over a foreign vessel that violated international rules and standards and IMO conventions relevant to marine pollution in the high sea or EEZ of another state. Port state control allows a port state to take proper measures over foreign vessels (e.g. ships’ detention or a port embargo) by verifying as to whether the ships comply with international rules and standards in respect of the safety of ships, certification and training of seafarers, crew competence and working conditions, in order to ensure maritime safety and protect the marine environment in their maritime zone. As a naturally acknowledged coastal states’ jurisdiction or sovereignty in the territorial sea under customary international law, besides, port state control enables a port state to fundamentally control vessel-source marine pollution by targeting ships’ physical defect or human defect as a prior measure. In contrast, port state jurisdiction based on Article 218 of the LOSC is not concerned with ships’ construction, equipment and design, but the violation of discharge standards referred in ’generally accepted international rules and standards’. Such port state jurisdiction seems to have a different viewpoint from traditional rule for maritime jurisdiction. In practice, port state control can be more effective measure than port state jurisdiction because port state control has low disturbance for international shipping and can play a role as a priori measure in preventing marine pollution. However, it should be kept in mind that a port state should actively exercise port state jurisdiction of the post-regulation level along with the exercise of port state control of a precautionary level to protect the marine environment of the global ocean and regional sea areas by preventing accidental discharges or operational discharges from ships beforehand. This study looks at in-depth the legal basis for port state jurisdiction and port state control as well as contents related to them. Further, this study wishes to refer to the contribution of port state jurisdiction and port state control to combat vessel-source marine pollution.

Abstract

Traditionally, the responsibility for securing the ships’ safety and the protection of the marine environment falls under a flag state flying its flag under international law. However, with the introduction of FOC regime, flag state control has weakened over the last few decades and this circumstance had resulted in severe maritime accidents and pollution incidents. Thus, the international community have been tried to contribute to the protection of the marine environment through the port states’ regulation under the recognition of that the flag state could be difficult to solve the issue of comprehensive regulation for the prevention and reduction of marine pollution. Under the LOSC, a port state may exercise legislative and enforcement jurisdiction over the ship that violated international rule and standards in their maritime zone and may institute proceedings over a foreign vessel that violated international rules and standards and IMO conventions relevant to marine pollution in the high sea or EEZ of another state. Port state control allows a port state to take proper measures over foreign vessels (e.g. ships’ detention or a port embargo) by verifying as to whether the ships comply with international rules and standards in respect of the safety of ships, certification and training of seafarers, crew competence and working conditions, in order to ensure maritime safety and protect the marine environment in their maritime zone. As a naturally acknowledged coastal states’ jurisdiction or sovereignty in the territorial sea under customary international law, besides, port state control enables a port state to fundamentally control vessel-source marine pollution by targeting ships’ physical defect or human defect as a prior measure. In contrast, port state jurisdiction based on Article 218 of the LOSC is not concerned with ships’ construction, equipment and design, but the violation of discharge standards referred in ’generally accepted international rules and standards’. Such port state jurisdiction seems to have a different viewpoint from traditional rule for maritime jurisdiction. In practice, port state control can be more effective measure than port state jurisdiction because port state control has low disturbance for international shipping and can play a role as a priori measure in preventing marine pollution. However, it should be kept in mind that a port state should actively exercise port state jurisdiction of the post-regulation level along with the exercise of port state control of a precautionary level to protect the marine environment of the global ocean and regional sea areas by preventing accidental discharges or operational discharges from ships beforehand. This study looks at in-depth the legal basis for port state jurisdiction and port state control as well as contents related to them. Further, this study wishes to refer to the contribution of port state jurisdiction and port state control to combat vessel-source marine pollution.

참고문헌 (59)

  1. Baatz Y, "Maritime Law" (2014), Informa Law
  2. Brugmann G, "Access to Maritime Ports" (2003), Books on Demand
  3. Churchill R, "The Law of the Sea" (2008), Manchester University Press
  4. Karim S, "Prevention of pollution of the Marine Environment from vessels: The potential and limits of the International Maritime Organisation" (2014), Springer International Publishing AG
  5. Kasoulides G, "Port State Control and Jurisdiction: Evolution of the Port State Regime" (1993), Martinu Nijhoff Publishers
  6. Marten B, "Port State Jurisdiction and the Regulation of International Merchant Shipping" (2014), Springer International Publishing
  7. Molenaar E, "Port and Coastal States in the Oxford Handbook of the Law of the Sea" (2015), Oxford University Press
  8. Molenaar E, "Coastal State Jurisdiction over Vessel-Source Pollution" (1998), Kluwer Law International
  9. Ozcayir Z.O, "Port State Control" (2001), LLP
  10. Ozcayir Z.O, "Pollution at Sea" (2012), Informa
  11. R. Rothwell D, "The International Law of the Sea" (2010), Hart Publishing
  12. Ringbom H, "The EU Maritime Safety Policy and International Law" (2008), M. Nijhoff Pub
  13. Tanaka Y, "The International Law of the Sea" (2013), Cambridge University Press
  14. Anderson H.E, "The Nationality of Ships and Flags of Convenience: Economics, Politics and Alternatives", Tulane Maritime Law Journal, 21 (1996)
  15. Bang HS, "Recent Developments in Regional Memorandums of Understanding on Port State Control", Ocean Development & International Law, 43 (2012)
  16. Bang HS, "Is Port State Control an effective means to combat vessel source marine pollution? An Empirical Survey of the Practical Exercise by Port States of Their Powers of Control", International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 28 (2008)
  17. Bang HS, "Port State Jurisdiction and Article 218 of the UN Convention on the Law of Sea", Journal of Maritime Law & Commerce, 40 (2009)
  18. Bang HS, "Recommendations for Policies on Port State Control and Port State Jurisdiction", Journal of Maritime Law & Commerce, 44 (2013)
  19. Bodansky D, "Protecting the Marine Environment from Vessel source marine pollution: UNCLOS III and Beyond", Ecology Law Quarterly, 18 (1991)
  20. Churchill R, "Port State Jurisdiction Relating to the Safety of Shipping and Pollution from ShipsWhat Degree of Extra territoriality?", International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 31 (2016)
  21. Curtis J, "Vessel source Oil Pollution and MARPOL 17", 78: An International Success Story?, 1985, pp.15, ~
  22. Devine D, "Port State Jurisdiction: A Judicial Contribution from New Zealand", Marine Policy, 24 (2000)
  23. Dzidzornu D. M, "Coastal state obligations and powers respecting EEZ environmental protection under Part XII of the UNCLOS: a descriptive analysis", Colorado International Journal Environmental Law & Policy, 8 (1997)
  24. Fayette L, "Access to Ports in International Law", International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 11 (1996)
  25. Gollasch S, "Critical review of the IMO International Convention on the management of ships’ ballast water and sediments", Harmful Algae, 6 (2007)
  26. Hare J, "Port State Control: Strong Medicine to Cure a Sick Industry", Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law, 26 (1997)
  27. Jaworski E, "Developments in Vessel-based pollution: Prestige oil Catastrophe Threatens West European Coastline, Spurs Europe to Take Action against Aging and Tankers", Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law and Policy (2002)
  28. Kasoulides G, "Paris Memorandum of Understanding: A Regional Regime of Enforcement", International Journal of Estuarine and Coastal Law, 5 (1990)
  29. Keselj T, "Port State Jurisdiction in respect of Pollution from Ships: The 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and the Memoranda of Understanding", Ocean Development & International Law, 30 (1999)
  30. Kindt J, "Vessel source marine pollution and the Law of Sea", Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 17 (1984)
  31. McDorman T, "Port State Jurisdiction: A comments of Article 218 of the 1982 Law of the Sea Convention", Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce, 28 (1996)
  32. Negret C, "Pretending to be Liberian and Panamanian Flags of Convenience and the Weakening of the Nation State on the High Seas", Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce, 46 (2016)
  33. Odeke A, "Port State Control and UK Law", Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce, 28 (1997)
  34. Ozcayir Z.O, "The use of Port State Control in Maritime Industry and Application of the Paris MoU", Ocean and Coastal Law Journal, 14 (2009)
  35. Rajadurai A, "Regulation of Shipping: The Vital Role of Port State Control", Australian and New Zealand Maritime Law Journal, 18 (2004)
  36. Richard A, "Port State Jurisdiction over Vessel source marine pollution", Harvard Environmental Law Review, 2 (1977)
  37. Tan A, "The Regulation of Vessel source marine pollution: Reconciling the Maritime and Coastal State Interests", Singapore Journal of International & Comparative Law, 1 (1997)
  38. Zwinge T, "Duties of Flag States to Implement and Enforce International Standards and Regulations And Measures to Counter Their Failure to Do So", Journal of International Business and Law, 10 (2010)
  39. 이윤철, "선박기인 해양오염에 대한 국가관할권의 한계와 문제점 및 향후 발전과제", 해사법연구, 19(2), pp.25~42 (2007), 한국해사법학회
  40. "A", CONF.13, L28 (1958), Art. 29, Para. 1, LOSC I, IV off. Rec. 123 (Italy); A, pp.CONF. 13, L.93 (1958)
  41. Report of the Working party (Comnd 4337), "Board of Trade, Committee of Inquiry into Shipping", H.M.S.O, ~ (1970)
  42. "IMO Resolution, A. 1052(27), Procedures for Port State Control, 2011. IMO, Resolution MEPC.252(67), Guidelines for Port State Control Under the BWM Convention", ~ (2014)
  43. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, "Review of Maritime Transport 2016", United Nation, ~ (2016)
  44. "Spills"[URL]
  45. "Global Treaty to Halt Invasive Aquatic Species to Enter into Force in 2017" (2016)[URL]
  46. "Flags of convenience"[URL]
  47. "Port State Control" (2017)[URL]
  48. "International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS), 1974" (2017)[URL]
  49. "Pollution Prevention" (2017)[URL]
  50. "Status of Conventions" (2017)[URL]
  51. "Anti-fouling system" (2017)[URL]
  52. "Ballast Water Management" (2017)[URL]
  53. "Maritime and Coastguard Agency" (2017)[URL]
  54. "The United States Coast Guard Marine Safety Manual Volume II: Materiel Inspection" (2017)[URL]
  55. "Port State Control in Australia" (2017)[URL]
  56. "Ship Safety Act" (2017)[URL]
  57. "Paris MoU" (2017)[URL]
  58. "Memorandum of Understanding on Port State Control in the Asia-Pacific" (2017)[URL]
  59. "Port state Control" (2017)[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)