본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

야류(野遊) 탈놀이의 어릿광대적 성격 등장인물 연구 – 부산동래⋅수영 야류를 중심으로 –

A Study on Yaryu Talnori’s Character of Clown in Korean Traditional Mask Drama–Focusing on Donglae⋅Suyoung Yaryu

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

The aim of this study is to examine Yaryu Talnori’s character of clown in Korean traditional mask drama. especially, Focusing on Donglae⋅Suyoung Yaryu. There are a many handed down traditional mask drama in Korea. And also it is found in all Busan regions. Especially, in this paper, dealt with the southern region Gyoungsangnamdo in Korea’s mask drama that is called Yaryu Talnori. And among characters that looked the clown character. Characters are called Malddugi and Youngno. Each of these characters have appeared in a separate scenes. Malddugi is the character against the ruling class. He is both a protagonist and at the same time antagonist in the performance. He mocks and satirizes that was called the ruling class as Yangban in Joseon Dynasty. And Youngno is a monster and a spiritual being. Youngno is counted as a kind of Ymugy, the appearance of Youngno has halfway looks between dragon and Ymugy. People see also emerging as a hybrids between dragon and Ymugy. Youngno eat very well without choosing anything. So it is compared with a legendary foreign object ‘Bulgasari’. Youngno eat all kinds of animals, as well as trees, rocks and iron. Even the man catch eat. All the people is hailed as a holly being, because it eat to choose only the corrupt officials and dirty Yangban. So sometimes people admired it as a hero of people. Youngno eat out the incompetent and corrupt Yangban. So they were so enthusiastic welcome from the lower classes. They are the figures of the clown character as well. they are called Eoritgwangdae in Korea. Eoritgwangdae is similar to Clown, Fool, Joker, Jokester, Wit-cracker, Prankster, Buffon, Trickster, Jester, and Villains in western. The most important characteristics of Eoritgwangdaes are that they mediate and interact with performer and audience. At the same time they are perfomer, acrobatic player, comic actor, partial director, and critical audience. So they are very significant being. Therefore I have been carried out fieldwork and research them. Eoritgwangdaes’ performance has meanings with the internalization of social conflicts. and they exist only as actions, interactions, and relationship. They entertain, and mark or change identity. After all they are healing people. Eoritgwangdaes make conversation with audience constantly. So I wish that their existence come to knowledge in the world. The stakes and the spirit are the special characters with the role and the character of the clown character character. Yaryu Talnori’ Malddugi and Youngno come on spectacular the stage as Eoritgwangdae(Korean traditional clown) They play various roles and have what it takes. That is to say. They have a lot of characteristics. Malddugi is the protagonist and the antagonist of the work as the representative of the oppressed people. Youngno is an imaginary object: a monster or a spirit, as an antagonist punishing the corrupt ruling class.

Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine Yaryu Talnori’s character of clown in Korean traditional mask drama. especially, Focusing on Donglae⋅Suyoung Yaryu. There are a many handed down traditional mask drama in Korea. And also it is found in all Busan regions. Especially, in this paper, dealt with the southern region Gyoungsangnamdo in Korea’s mask drama that is called Yaryu Talnori. And among characters that looked the clown character. Characters are called Malddugi and Youngno. Each of these characters have appeared in a separate scenes. Malddugi is the character against the ruling class. He is both a protagonist and at the same time antagonist in the performance. He mocks and satirizes that was called the ruling class as Yangban in Joseon Dynasty. And Youngno is a monster and a spiritual being. Youngno is counted as a kind of Ymugy, the appearance of Youngno has halfway looks between dragon and Ymugy. People see also emerging as a hybrids between dragon and Ymugy. Youngno eat very well without choosing anything. So it is compared with a legendary foreign object ‘Bulgasari’. Youngno eat all kinds of animals, as well as trees, rocks and iron. Even the man catch eat. All the people is hailed as a holly being, because it eat to choose only the corrupt officials and dirty Yangban. So sometimes people admired it as a hero of people. Youngno eat out the incompetent and corrupt Yangban. So they were so enthusiastic welcome from the lower classes. They are the figures of the clown character as well. they are called Eoritgwangdae in Korea. Eoritgwangdae is similar to Clown, Fool, Joker, Jokester, Wit-cracker, Prankster, Buffon, Trickster, Jester, and Villains in western. The most important characteristics of Eoritgwangdaes are that they mediate and interact with performer and audience. At the same time they are perfomer, acrobatic player, comic actor, partial director, and critical audience. So they are very significant being. Therefore I have been carried out fieldwork and research them. Eoritgwangdaes’ performance has meanings with the internalization of social conflicts. and they exist only as actions, interactions, and relationship. They entertain, and mark or change identity. After all they are healing people. Eoritgwangdaes make conversation with audience constantly. So I wish that their existence come to knowledge in the world. The stakes and the spirit are the special characters with the role and the character of the clown character character. Yaryu Talnori’ Malddugi and Youngno come on spectacular the stage as Eoritgwangdae(Korean traditional clown) They play various roles and have what it takes. That is to say. They have a lot of characteristics. Malddugi is the protagonist and the antagonist of the work as the representative of the oppressed people. Youngno is an imaginary object: a monster or a spirit, as an antagonist punishing the corrupt ruling class.

참고문헌 (67)

  1. "2016년 5월1일 13시 부산시 동래구 호텔농심 야외마당 국가무형문화재 제18호 동래야류 정기공연(최락용 사진과 비디오 촬영 및 녹화)", ~
  2. "2016년 6월4일 12시 부산시 수영구 수영사적공원 내 수영민속박물관 놀이마당 국가무형문화재 제43호 수영야류 정기공연(최락용 사진과 비디오 촬영 및 녹화)", ~
  3. 고승길, "아시아―어릿광대의 고고학: 특히 인도연극의 비두사카적 전통을 중심으로", 한·인문화논총, 15 (2004)
  4. 김경남, "동래야류" (2000), 화산문화
  5. 논장 편집부, "미학사전" (1988), 논장
  6. 박진태, "통영오광대" (2001), 화산문화
  7. 박진태, "민속극의 놀이꾼과 구경꾼의 관계를 통해 본문화융합", 구비문학연구, (26), pp.131~156 (2008), 한국구비문학회
  8. 송석하, "석남 송석하 한국민속의 재음미 上" (2004), 국립민속박물관
  9. 서대석, "한국구비문학에 수용된 재담 연구" (2004), 서울대학교출판부
  10. 서연호, "野遊·五廣大탈놀이" (1994), 열화당
  11. 서연호, "한국가면극" (2002), 월인
  12. 송동준, "브레히트의 서사극" (1997), 서울대학교출판부
  13. 신이와 이단의 문화사 팀, "귀신·요괴·이물의 비교문화론" (2014), 소명출판
  14. 安秀玹, "탈놀이의 靈物科場 硏究", 석사, 한국학, pp.1993
  15. 안장환, "한국가면극 어릿광대 연기의 미학적 연구 : 코메디아 델알테 어릿광대 연기와의 비교를 통해서", 석사, 연극학, pp.2007
  16. 엄국현, "한국고대가요와 어릿광대의 세계", 한국문학논총, 20 (1997), 한국문학회
  17. 옥재은, "연극적 장치로서의 어릿광대 연구 : '탈춤' 을 중심으로", 석사, 연극학, pp.2004
  18. 이두현, "한국가면극" (1995), 서울대학교출판부
  19. 이두현, "한국연극사" (1999), 학연사
  20. 이상섭, "아리스토텔레스의 『시학』 연구" (2002), 문학과 지성사
  21. 이상일, "축제와 마당극" (1986), 조선일보선서
  22. 자투리북스 편집부, "한국환상사전" (2016), 알라딘 ebook
  23. 전경욱, "한국가면극, 그 역사와 원리" (1998), 열화당
  24. 전경욱, "한국전통연희사전" (2014), 민속원
  25. 전호태, "고분 벽화로 본 고구려 이야기" (2006), 풀빛
  26. 전호태, "벽화여, 고구려를 말하라" (2008), 사계절
  27. 정상박, "오광대와 들놀음 연구" (1990), 집문당
  28. 정상박, "수영야류" (2001), 화산문화
  29. 조동일, "한국문학통사 3" (1994), 지식산업사
  30. 秋英植, "셰익스피어 광대의 극적 기능", 박사, 영어영문학, pp.1993
  31. 최락용, "한국 전통 인형극의 공연학적 연구" (2013), 민속원
  32. 최락용, "남사당패의 어릿광대들 연구", 한국극예술연구, (43), pp.13~61 (2014), 한국극예술학회[DOI]
  33. 최락용, "한국 전통 인형극에 등장하는 이물(異物) 연구: 영물(靈物)과 괴물(怪物)을 중심으로", 한국극예술연구, (50), pp.125~198 (2015), 한국극예술학회[DOI]
  34. 최락용, "오광대(五廣大) 탈놀이의 어릿광대적 성격 인물 연구", 건지인문학, (18), pp.281~327 (2017), 인문학연구소[DOI]
  35. 최남선, "조선상식문답 속편" (2013), 경인문화사
  36. 최상수, "野遊·五廣大假面劇의 硏究" (1984), 성문각
  37. 가라타니 고진, "트랜스크리틱" (2006), 한길사
  38. Aristoteles, "시학" (1989), 문예출판사
  39. Mikhail Bakhtin, "프랑수아 라블레의 작품과 중세 및 르네상스의 민중문" (2001), 아카넷
  40. M. Bakhtin, "말의 미학" (2007), 도서출판 길
  41. Walter Benjamin, "발터 벤야민의 문예이론" (2000), 민음사
  42. Ted Benton, "사회과학의 철학적 기초" (1984), 풀빛
  43. 창조적 진화, "웃음", pp.동서문화사, 도덕과 종교의 두 원천
  44. Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, "몰입의 즐거움" (2008), 해냄
  45. Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, "몰입" (2009), 한울림
  46. Gilles Deleuze, "차이와 반복" (2004), 민음사
  47. J. G. Frazer, "황금가지" (2010), 을유문화사
  48. Eduard Fuchs, "풍속의 역사 Ⅲ" (2009), 까치
  49. Erving Goffman, "상호작용 의례" (2013), 아카넷
  50. E. Hobsbawm, "전통의 날조와 창조" (1999), 서경문화사
  51. Georg Lukács, "루카치 문학이론" (1990), 세계
  52. John Mack, "마스크: 투탄카멘에서 할로윈까지" (2000), 개마고원
  53. Richard E. Palmer, "해석학이란 무엇인가" (2012), 문예출판사
  54. Patrice Pavis, "연극학사전" (1999), 현대미학사
  55. Olivier Reboul, "언어와 이데올로기" (1994), 역사비평사
  56. Paul Ricoeur, "해석이론" (2003), 서광사
  57. Roger Simon, "그람시의 정치사상" (1985), 청사
  58. Victor Turner, "제의에서 연극으로" (1996), 현대미학사
  59. Viktor Shklovsky, "러시아 형식주의 문학이론" (1980), 월인재
  60. Wes Nisker, "웃으면서 이기는 바보의 비밀" (2009), 이레
  61. Leonard C. Pronko, "Theatre East and West" (1967), University of California Press
  62. A. G. Scott, "The theatre in Asia" (1972), Macmillan publishing co., inc
  63. Gayatri C. Spivak, "A Critique Postcolonial Reason" (1999), Harvard University press
  64. Olga Taxidou, "The Mask" (2004), harwood academic publishers
  65. "국립국어원 표준국어대사전", ~

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)