본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

본질과 가능 세계― 통세계적 동일성의 문제와 상대역 이론을 중심으로 ―

Essences and Possible Worlds ― the Problem of Transworld Identity and the Counterpart Theory ―

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

주제분류기타인문학

초록

This paper aims to point out the special problem that is raised in using the notion of possible worlds to understand essences. Furthermore‚ the paper intends to consider the alternatives. Specifically‚ there is the problem of transworld identity‚ that is‚ Leibniz’s Law of the principle of the indiscernibility of identicals is broken among objects in different possible worlds. Therefore David Lewis suggests the counterpart theory. It shows that objects are not identical but similar across possible worlds. I accept that the notion of possible worlds is used to account for essences but reject that objects are transworld identical. In conclusion‚ I argue that we can get much better answer to the question -“What is it?”- by considering individual essences and intrinsicality.

Abstract

This paper aims to point out the special problem that is raised in using the notion of possible worlds to understand essences. Furthermore‚ the paper intends to consider the alternatives. Specifically‚ there is the problem of transworld identity‚ that is‚ Leibniz’s Law of the principle of the indiscernibility of identicals is broken among objects in different possible worlds. Therefore David Lewis suggests the counterpart theory. It shows that objects are not identical but similar across possible worlds. I accept that the notion of possible worlds is used to account for essences but reject that objects are transworld identical. In conclusion‚ I argue that we can get much better answer to the question -“What is it?”- by considering individual essences and intrinsicality.

참고문헌 (23)

  1. 김민석, "David Lewis의 상대역 이론에 대한 Alvin Plantinga의 비판:의미론적 부적합성 주장에 대한 비판적 검토", 근대철학, 10, pp.77~103 (2017), 서양근대철학회
  2. 박준호, "직접 지시론의 본질주의에 관한 연구", 박사, 철학과, pp.1997
  3. 박제철, "라이프니츠 철학의 결정론적 성격 ― 가능세계와 개체의 통세계적 동일성 ―", 철학, (98), pp.81~107 (2009), 한국철학회
  4. 선우환, "통세계적 동일성의 문제와 양상 인식론", 철학연구, (65), pp.193~221 (2004), 철학연구회
  5. 선우환, "루이스의 양상 실재론과 구체적 존재자로서의 가능 세계", 철학논총, 1(47), pp.137~160 (2007), 새한철학회
  6. 손병홍, "통세계적 동일성 문제의 해결 방식으로서의 상대역 이론", 철학연구, 27, pp.311~327 (1990), 철학연구회
  7. 손병홍, "가능세계 이론들에 대한 고찰", 범한철학, 70(3), pp.215~246 (2013), 범한철학회
  8. 한성일, "본질과 정체성", 철학, (124), pp.73~96 (2015), 한국철학회
  9. 한성일, "현대 형이상학에서 아리스토텔레스적 본질주의의 귀환", 서양고전학연구, 56(1), pp.59~89 (2017), 한국서양고전학회[DOI]
  10. Denby‚ David, "Companion to Intrinsic Properties‚", pp.87~109 (2014), De Gruyter
  11. "Identity Over Time" (2016)[URL]
  12. Hintikka‚ Jaakko, "Modality as Referential Multiplicity", Ajatus, 20, pp.49~64 (1957)
  13. Kanger‚ Stig, "Probability in Logic" (1957), Almgvist and Wiksell
  14. Kripke‚ Saul, "A Completeness Theorem in Modal Logic", The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 24, pp.1~14 (1959)
  15. Kripke‚ Saul, "Semantical Analysis of Modal Logic 1‚ Normal Propositional Calculi", Zeitschrift für Mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik, 9, pp.67~96 (1963)
  16. Kripke‚ Saul, "Semantical Considerations on Modal Logic", Acta Philosophica Fennica, 16, pp.83~94 (1963)
  17. Lewis‚ David, "Counterpart Theory and Quantified Modal Logic", The Journal of Philosophy, 65, pp.113~126 (1968)
  18. Lewis‚ David, "Counterfactuals" (1973), Blackwell
  19. Lewis‚ David, "Philosophical Papers‚ Vol. I" (1983), Oxford University Press
  20. Lewis‚ David, "On the Plurality of Worlds" (1986), Blackwell
  21. "Transworld Identity" (2017)[URL]
  22. Montague‚ Richard, "Logical Necessity‚ Physical Necessity‚ Ethics‚ and Quantifier", Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, 3, pp.259~269 (1960)
  23. Nolan‚ Daniel, "David Lewis" (2005), Acumen

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)