본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

황석영 ≪낯익은 세상≫의 장소 표상과 문화지리학적 함의

A Study on the Representation of Placeness and the Cultural and Geographical Implications of Hwang Sokyong’s Familiar World

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

Author Hwang Sokyong, in his work Familiar World(2011), critically examines the material desire of modern people by focusing on the landfill site ‘Ggotseom’ as a familiar place encountered by Korean society as it enters into a capitalist one. Through the gaze of the narrator, the author points out the cold stratification of industrialization by paying attention to the dissolution of a sense of community and the hierarchy of place represented by Ggotseom. The structure of physical power affecting even the children and the stipulation of compartmented place cross-sectionally depicts the old base of life in this unrealistic space to powerfully demonstrate the negative aspect of materialism. Just like the landfill site, urbanites in town and the department stores try to exclude the residents living in the landfill site from the place of the urbanites. The reader is able to see the phenomena of capitalist life deeply embedded within Korean society in the scenery of place ceaselessly separated through the ownership of capital and the sense of smell. Ggotseom children lack a sense of place in the home and family and perceive Ggotseom as an abandoned place filled with garbage – the ugly image of things. The culture of consumption has damaged their base of life, and in order to critically deliberate the dissolution of the family and the inhuman image of life, the author draws out the world lived by illusions(ghosts) represented as the blue light. With regards to the importance of community values and the solidarity of mutual care of the traditional world as a cultural value, the author compartmentalizes through a dichotomous arrangement between reality and unreality, dump/department store and general store/shrine, and past and present. The author creates a dichotomous narrative out of the cultural geography by arranging the landfill as a non-place and a topophobic place, and on the other hand, the general store and the community solidarity of the unrealistic space of the old shrine and spirits as topophilic places. After everything burns down, the lives of the people living in Ggotseom are the same, but the author speaks again about hope amidst a situation of despair. Through the young narrator, the author emphasizes ecological motivations and he dreams of a cultural topography of primitive space as an alternative. The return to ecological values is distant from reality just as much as the lives of the old spirits and may seem like a meaningless alternative. However, it emphasizes the regenerative power of nature just like budding sprouts, and the author presents the necessity of restoring circulatory ecological values and adaption as what we must learn in a life of agricultural community. Waste created from the unlimited supply of resources necessary to humans ultimately makes people inhumane, homes devoid of a sense of place, and children unlike children. Recreating primitive space into an unattainable and unrealistic utopia as an ecological alternative ultimately contains a dichotomous meaning. It is a space people cannot encounter in the current world, but these place were sufficiently enjoyed and indifferently overlooked in the traditional society of the past. The space of the landfill is a representation of place created directly by ourselves, where social contradictions involving the weakening of human solidarity and the dissolution of family as a result of prevalent materialism are all gathered together simultaneous with the transition to a capitalist society. Hence, people will only be able to recover a sense of place containing reality and an affection for place from the most basic place of home where the circulatory world of nature must be recovered and harmonized.

Abstract

Author Hwang Sokyong, in his work Familiar World(2011), critically examines the material desire of modern people by focusing on the landfill site ‘Ggotseom’ as a familiar place encountered by Korean society as it enters into a capitalist one. Through the gaze of the narrator, the author points out the cold stratification of industrialization by paying attention to the dissolution of a sense of community and the hierarchy of place represented by Ggotseom. The structure of physical power affecting even the children and the stipulation of compartmented place cross-sectionally depicts the old base of life in this unrealistic space to powerfully demonstrate the negative aspect of materialism. Just like the landfill site, urbanites in town and the department stores try to exclude the residents living in the landfill site from the place of the urbanites. The reader is able to see the phenomena of capitalist life deeply embedded within Korean society in the scenery of place ceaselessly separated through the ownership of capital and the sense of smell. Ggotseom children lack a sense of place in the home and family and perceive Ggotseom as an abandoned place filled with garbage – the ugly image of things. The culture of consumption has damaged their base of life, and in order to critically deliberate the dissolution of the family and the inhuman image of life, the author draws out the world lived by illusions(ghosts) represented as the blue light. With regards to the importance of community values and the solidarity of mutual care of the traditional world as a cultural value, the author compartmentalizes through a dichotomous arrangement between reality and unreality, dump/department store and general store/shrine, and past and present. The author creates a dichotomous narrative out of the cultural geography by arranging the landfill as a non-place and a topophobic place, and on the other hand, the general store and the community solidarity of the unrealistic space of the old shrine and spirits as topophilic places. After everything burns down, the lives of the people living in Ggotseom are the same, but the author speaks again about hope amidst a situation of despair. Through the young narrator, the author emphasizes ecological motivations and he dreams of a cultural topography of primitive space as an alternative. The return to ecological values is distant from reality just as much as the lives of the old spirits and may seem like a meaningless alternative. However, it emphasizes the regenerative power of nature just like budding sprouts, and the author presents the necessity of restoring circulatory ecological values and adaption as what we must learn in a life of agricultural community. Waste created from the unlimited supply of resources necessary to humans ultimately makes people inhumane, homes devoid of a sense of place, and children unlike children. Recreating primitive space into an unattainable and unrealistic utopia as an ecological alternative ultimately contains a dichotomous meaning. It is a space people cannot encounter in the current world, but these place were sufficiently enjoyed and indifferently overlooked in the traditional society of the past. The space of the landfill is a representation of place created directly by ourselves, where social contradictions involving the weakening of human solidarity and the dissolution of family as a result of prevalent materialism are all gathered together simultaneous with the transition to a capitalist society. Hence, people will only be able to recover a sense of place containing reality and an affection for place from the most basic place of home where the circulatory world of nature must be recovered and harmonized.

참고문헌 (25)

  1. 황석영, "낯익은 세상" (2011), 문학동네
  2. 권혁래, "문학지리학 연구의 정체성과 연구방법론 고찰", 우리문학연구, (51), pp.167~197 (2016), 우리문학회[DOI]
  3. 김현경, "사람, 장소, 환대" (2015), 문학과지성사
  4. 박승규, "일상의 지리학 – 인간과 공간의 관계를 묻다" (2009), 책세상
  5. 이호, "난지도와 난지도 주민들의 주거권", 도시와 빈곤, 통권 : 21 (1996)
  6. 전종한, "인문지리학의 시선" (2005), 서울: 논형
  7. 정지아, "낯익은 욕망의 폐허 너머", 창작과 비평, 39(3) (2011)
  8. 정채성, "난지도 주민의 빈곤과 사회적 관계의 성격", 한국문화인류학, 21 (1989)
  9. 최병천, "난지도 리포트 – 난지도 사람들의 생존을 위한 삶", 새가정 (1987)
  10. Abraham Moles, "키치란 무엇인가" (1994), 시각과 언어
  11. Anthony Giddens, "사회학의 핵심 개념들" (2015), 동녘
  12. David Atkinson, "현대 문화지리학" (2011), 논형
  13. David Harvey, "희망의 공간: 세계화, 신체, 유토피아" (2001), 한울
  14. Edward Relph, "장소와 장소상실" (2005), 논형
  15. Hannah Arendt, "인간의 조건" (1996), 한길사
  16. Henri Lefebvre, "공간의 생산" (2011), 에코리브르
  17. James W. Kalat, "정서심리학" (2007), 시그마프레스
  18. Jon Anderson, "문화⋅장소⋅흔적" (2013), 한울
  19. Linda McDowell, "젠더, 정체성, 장소" (2010), 한울
  20. Mark M. Smith, "감각의 역사" (2010), 성균관대학교출판부
  21. Mary Douglas, "순수와 위험" (1997), 현대미학사
  22. Rene Welek, "문학의 이론" (1987), 문예출판사
  23. Rob Hengeveld, "훼손된 세상" (2013), 생각과사람들
  24. Yi-Fu Tuan, "공간과 장소" (1995), 대윤
  25. Yi-Fu Tuan, "토포필리아" (2011), 에코리브르

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)