국가수준 학업성취도 혈액 순환 관련 문제 해결에서 드러난 중학생들의 응답 특성 분석
Analysis of Middle School Students’ Responses Characteristics Revealed in Solving the Problem Related to Blood Circulation in National Assessment of Educational Achievement
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study was to investigate middle school students’ responses characteristics revealed in solving the problem related to blood circulation. We analyzed the students’ responses types and characteristics by using the students’ answers in NAEA(National Assessment of Educational Achievement). According to the results of this study, the correct answer rate for the test item was 31.7%, which is lower than the average of the correct answer rate in descriptive assessment items. And the students’ responses types and characteristics were categorized by 7 types, in which the correct answer types and the incorrect answer types. The correct answer types contained ‘fully understanding’ and ‘partially understanding’, and the incorrect answer types contained the content-specific incorrect answer types such as ‘misunderstanding concept’ and ‘making incorrect assumption’, and the content-general incorrect answer types such as ‘misreading’, ‘disregarding evidence’ and ‘restate data’. According to the achievement level groups, prominent students’ responses types were different: the type of ‘fully understanding’ in Level 4 group, the types of ‘fully understanding’, ‘partially understanding’, ‘misunderstanding concept’ and ‘misreading’ in Level 3 group, the types of ‘misunderstanding concept’, ‘disregarding evidence’, and ‘restate data’ in Level 2 group. As non-responses were predominant in Level 1 group, only some of answers in Level 1 group were identified. Based on these results, we suggested implications for teaching and learning on blood circulation.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate middle school students’ responses characteristics revealed in solving the problem related to blood circulation. We analyzed the students’ responses types and characteristics by using the students’ answers in NAEA(National Assessment of Educational Achievement). According to the results of this study, the correct answer rate for the test item was 31.7%, which is lower than the average of the correct answer rate in descriptive assessment items. And the students’ responses types and characteristics were categorized by 7 types, in which the correct answer types and the incorrect answer types. The correct answer types contained ‘fully understanding’ and ‘partially understanding’, and the incorrect answer types contained the content-specific incorrect answer types such as ‘misunderstanding concept’ and ‘making incorrect assumption’, and the content-general incorrect answer types such as ‘misreading’, ‘disregarding evidence’ and ‘restate data’. According to the achievement level groups, prominent students’ responses types were different: the type of ‘fully understanding’ in Level 4 group, the types of ‘fully understanding’, ‘partially understanding’, ‘misunderstanding concept’ and ‘misreading’ in Level 3 group, the types of ‘misunderstanding concept’, ‘disregarding evidence’, and ‘restate data’ in Level 2 group. As non-responses were predominant in Level 1 group, only some of answers in Level 1 group were identified. Based on these results, we suggested implications for teaching and learning on blood circulation.
참고문헌 (33)
- Angoff, W. H, "Educational Measurement", pp.508~600 (1971), American Council on Education
- Arnaudin, M. W., "Students’alternative conceptions of the human circulatory system : A cross-age study", Science Education, 69(5), pp.721~733 (1985)
- Buckley, B. C., "Interactive multimedia and model-based learning in biology", International Journal of Science Education, 22(9), pp.895~935 (2000)
- Chi, M. T. H., "Commonsense conceptions of emergent processes: Why some misconceptions are robust", The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(2), pp.161~199 (2005)
- Chi, M. T. H., "Eliciting things to processes : A theory of conceptual change for learning science concepts", Learning and Instruction, 4(1), pp.27~43 (1994)
- Chin, C., "Problem-based learning:Using ill-structured problem in biology project work", Science Education, 90(1), pp.44~67 (2006)
- 동효관, "PISA 2006 서술형 문항에서 온실효과에 대한 학생들의 응답 유형 분석", 열린교육연구, 21(2), pp.209~232 (2013), 한국열린교육학회
- Driver, R., "Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms", Science Education, 84, pp.287~312 (2000)
- Fraser, M. J., "Solving chemical problem", Chemical Society Reviews, 11(2), pp.171~190 (1982)
- Hafner, R., "Revising explanatory models to accommodate anomalous genetic phenomena : Problem solving in the"context of discovery"", Science Education, 40(1), pp.6~33 (1995)
- A Study on Improving the Usefulness of the National Assessment of Educational Achievement with Sample Data, "Jung, H. -K.", KICE, ~, pp.RRE 2018-9 (2018)
- 김현경, "중학교 3학년 학생들의 과학과 학업성취도의 성별차이", 대한화학회지, 57(1), pp.138~146 (2013), 대한화학회[DOI]
- Analysis of assessment results in the 2020 National Assessment of Educational Achievement(NAEA): Scinece, "Kim, Y.", KICE, ~, pp.KICE ORM 2021-52 (2021)
- 이재봉, "중학생의 시각 개념의 성취수준별 특성 분석", 새물리, 69(7), pp.727~736 (2019), 한국물리학회[DOI]
- 이기영, "국가수준 학업성취도 평가의 서답형 문항을 이용한 중학교 과학 8개 핵심 개념에 대한 학습발달과정 탐색", 과학교육연구지, 41(3), pp.382~404 (2017), 과학교육연구소[DOI]
- Analysis on constructed response items in the 2015 National Assessment of Educational Achievement(NAEA): Science, "Lee, I.", KICE, ~ (2016)
- Analysis of student responses to constructed response items in the National Assessment of Educational Achievement(NAEA), "Lee, I.", KICE, ~, pp.RRE 2015-12-2 (2015)
- Lee, S. H., "Analysis of elementary school students’ psychological science domains by classifying science vocabularies", Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 21(1), pp.30~37 (2001)
- Martínez Aznar, M. M., "Solving problems in genetics", International Journal of Science Education, 27(1), pp.101~121 (2005)
- McNeill, K. L., "Elementary students' views of explanation, argumentation, and evidence, and their abilities to construct arguments over the school year", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(7), pp.793~823 (2011)
- Science Curriculum, "Ministry of Education", Ministry of Education, ~, pp.Notification No. 2015-74 (2015)
- Murphy, R. J. L., "Sex differences in objective test performance", British Journal of Educational Psychology, 52, pp.213~219 (1982)
- National Research Council, "National Science Education Standards" (1996), The National Academies Press
- Özgür, S, "The persistence of misconceptions about the human blood circulatory system among students in different grade levels", International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 8(2), pp.255~268 (2013)
- National Assessment of Educational Achievement:technical report, "Park, J.", KICE, ~, pp.RRO 2006-4 (2006)
- Pelaez, N. J., "Prevalence of blood circulation misconceptions among prospective elementary teachers", Advances in Physiology Education, 29(3), pp.172~181 (2005)
- Prevost, L. B., "Step by step : Biology undergraduate’ problem-solving procedures during multiple-choice assessment", Life Science Education, 15(4), pp.1~14 (2016)
- Sandoval, W. A., "The quality of students’ use of evidence in written scientific explanations", Cognition and Instruction, 23(1), pp.23~55 (2005)
- 신동희, "평가 방법에 따른 과학 성취도에서의 성 차이", 한국과학교육학회지, 23(3), pp.265~275 (2003), 한국과학교육학회
- Shin, D. H., "Gender differences in achievement of earth and environmental area in PISA 2000", Korean Association for Science Education, 22(1), pp.40~53 (2002)
- Shin, N., "Predictors of well-structured and ill-structured problem solving in an astronomy simulation", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(1), pp.6~33 (2003)
- Smith, M. U., "Successful and unsuccessful problem solving in classical genetic pedigrees", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25(6), pp.411~433 (1988)
- Stewart, J., "Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and Learning", pp.284~300 (1994), Macrnillan