이해조 刪正 판소리의 《매일신보》 연재 양상과 의미
Aspect and meaning of the serially published Pansori in the Maeilsinbo as adapted by Lee Haejo
0
조회
0
다운로드
17
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
A thesis adapted by Lee Haejo in 1912 and made for research aiming at the Okjunghwa(옥중화), Gangsangryeon(강상련), Yeon’uigak(연의각) and Touigan(토의간) which were published serially in the Maeilsinbo which is a newspaper. In this research, the development and meanings of these works were considered. The writer understood that Lee Haejo has not carried Pansori as it was but instead he adapted the work and concentrated on its reason and understanding of the intention for the adaptation. Through this research, the writer can conclude that Lee Haejo had had eliminated the problems that have occurred in the transmission process of Pansori while exhibiting consciousness on its desirable components. In accordance with this conclusion, in order to solve the matters of concern, Lee Haejo had deleted unnecessary parts and added only those that are important in the original work. As a conclusion, through this research, it can be said that Lee Haejo was an individual who, even had had illuminism recognition, had not unconditionally reduced any value from traditional things, otherwise had had preserved their peculiar characteristics. At the same time, the point that Lee Haejo had positively found a way for this work and its readers to meet through various means of understanding, it can be known that Lee Haejo was a person who provided an extensively wide perspective about Pansori and classical novels.
Abstract
A thesis adapted by Lee Haejo in 1912 and made for research aiming at the Okjunghwa(옥중화), Gangsangryeon(강상련), Yeon’uigak(연의각) and Touigan(토의간) which were published serially in the Maeilsinbo which is a newspaper. In this research, the development and meanings of these works were considered. The writer understood that Lee Haejo has not carried Pansori as it was but instead he adapted the work and concentrated on its reason and understanding of the intention for the adaptation. Through this research, the writer can conclude that Lee Haejo had had eliminated the problems that have occurred in the transmission process of Pansori while exhibiting consciousness on its desirable components. In accordance with this conclusion, in order to solve the matters of concern, Lee Haejo had deleted unnecessary parts and added only those that are important in the original work. As a conclusion, through this research, it can be said that Lee Haejo was an individual who, even had had illuminism recognition, had not unconditionally reduced any value from traditional things, otherwise had had preserved their peculiar characteristics. At the same time, the point that Lee Haejo had positively found a way for this work and its readers to meet through various means of understanding, it can be known that Lee Haejo was a person who provided an extensively wide perspective about Pansori and classical novels.
참고문헌 (18)
- "매일신보", ~ (1912)
- 권순긍, "판소리 개작소설 <옥중화>의 근대성", 반교어문연구, 2 (1990), 반교어문연구회
- 김재남, "이해조 작품연구 - 판소리 산정(刪正) 신소설화 과정을 중심으로", 세종어문연구, 1 (1986), 세종대 세종어문학회
- 김종철, "<옥중화> 연구 - 이해조 개작에 대한 재론", 관악어문연구, 20 (1995), 대학교 국어국문학과
- 김현양, "<옥중화>의 계보", 동방고전문학연구, (창간) (1999), 동방고전문학회
- 방효순, "일제시대 저작권 제도의 정착과정에 관한 연구 - 저작관련사항을 중심으로", 서지학연구, 21 (2001), 서지학회
- 서유석, "20세기 초반 활자본 춘향전의 변모 양상과 그 의미", 판소리연구, (24), pp.133~170 (2007), 판소리학회
- 송민호, "개화기소설의 사적 연구" (1975), 일지사
- 엄태웅, "활자본 고전소설의 근대적 간행 양상", 석사, pp.2007
- 오윤선, "<옥중화>를 통해 본 '이해조 개작 판소리'의 양상과 그 의미", 판소리연구, (21), pp.381~413 (2006), 판소리학회
- 윤용식, "신재효 ‘토별가’와 이해조 ‘별주부전’과의 비교연구", 관악어문연구, 6 (1981)
- 윤용식, "신재효 판소리 사설과 이해조 판소리계 작품과의 비교 연구", 국문학연구, 56 (1982), 서울대학교 국문학연구회
- 임화, "개설 조선신문학사", 인문평론 (1942)
- 전광용, "신소설 연구" (1986), 새문사
- 조윤제, "춘향전 이본고" (1957), 을유문화사
- 최원식, "이해조 소설선: 자유종" (1996), 창작과비평사
- 최원식, "이해조 문학 연구, In 한국근대소설사론" (1986), 창작과비평사
- 한기형, "1910년대 신소설에 미친 출판·유통환경의 영향, In 한국근대소설사의 시각" (1999), 소명
