본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

공급사슬에서 한국 수출기업의 기업 간 관계와 성과차이에 대한 연구

A Study on Inter-Corporate Relationships of Korean Exporting Firms and Gaps in Performance in Supply Chains

이양기|배희성
한국해운물류학회 (The Korean Association Of Shipping And Logistics, Inc.)|2015.09|해운물류연구 (Journal of Shipping and Logistics)|제31권 제3호|pp. 663-689|DOI 10.37059/tjosal.2015.31.3.663

1

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

공급사슬성과차이기업 간 관계supply chainsinter-corporate relationshipgaps in performance
주제분류해상운송학

초록

본 연구의 목적은 기업 간 관계에서 공급사슬협력수준들을 분류하고 이러한 수준들 간의 성과차이를 분석하는 것이다. 분석결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 공급사슬협력수준들은 내부협력, 공급자협력, 고객협력 및 공급사슬협력으로 분류된다. 이는 기업들의 현재의 공급사슬협력수준을 반영한다. 둘째, 표본기업들은 공급자협력에 가장 많이 포함되었다. 그 이유는 표본기업들이 중소기업을 많이 포함하고 있기 때문이다. 셋째, 공급사슬협력수준들 간의 비용성과와 서비스성과에서 차이를 보였다. 이는 기업들이 높은 성과를 달성하기 위해 공급사슬협력을 위한 전략적 선택을 해야 한다는 것을 반영한다. 넷째, 공분산분석의 결과는 공급사슬협력수준들 간의 비용성과의 차이가 서비스성과에 의해 영향을 받는 것으로 확인되었다. 이는 서비스성과와 비용성과 간의 차원을 설명한다.

Abstract

The aims of this research are to classify the levels of supply chain collaboration in the relationships between firms and to analyze gaps in performance among the levels. To achieve the aims, this research ascertained the theoretical relationships between the variables and developed conceptual and operational definitions of the variables through prior research. The questionnaire was sent to the members of Korean International Trade Association and 241 data were collected. The results of the analyses are as follows. First, the levels of supply chain collaboration are classified into internal collaboration, supplier collaboration, customer collaboration and supply chain collaboration. The result explains that they are mutual independent clusters. The result was analyzed on the basis of clear criteria and as a result, firms can attain internal collaboration, supplier collaboration, customer collaboration and supply chain collaboration in order. Second, there are the largest numbers of sample firms in supplier collaboration. This reflects the fact that the population is Korean exporting firms. The firms have the low level of involvement with importers because they are exporters rather than the high level of involvement such as foreign direct investment or joint venture. Therefore, they have the high level of collaboration with domestic suppliers rather than oversea importers. Third, there are gaps in cost performance and service performance among the levels of supply chain collaboration and in addition, the result of post hoc analysis explains the amount of performance improvement on the basis of the levels of supply chain collaboration. This reflects the fact that there are gaps in performance among the levels of supply chain collaboration. The result explains that if they want to achieve the high level of performance, they need to find their position in the levels from the viewpoint of strategic choice theory. As a result, they can attain the high level of performance when they move their position on the higher levels of supply chain collaboration on the basis of strategic decision-making. However, the result of post hoc analysis shows that customer collaboration has higher performance than supplier collaboration. The reason is that the sample firms were almost small and medium sized enterprises. In other words, the sample firms are a lack of competence to perform supplier collaboration and customer collaboration simultaneously and as a result, they focus their competence on customer collaboration, followed by high performance. From the viewpoint of the bargaining power of Porter(1980), the bargaining power of customers is higher than the bargaining power of suppliers and as a result, firms which focus on customer collaboration can achieve higher performance. Fourth, the result of analysis of covariance shows that gaps in cost performance among the levels of supply chain collaboration are affected by service performance. However, gaps in service performance are affected by the levels of supply chain collaboration. This means that the levels of supply chain collaboration are based on service performance, which is based on cost performance. This explains the dimensions of performance. Service performance is regarded as the precedent variable of cost performance in the dimension. In other words, from the viewpoint of strategic choice theory, when firms perform strategy, they can achieve service performance firstly, followed by cost performance finally. Therefore, when firms decide strategy, they should firstly consider service performance rather than cost performance.

참고문헌 (45)

  1. 金基燦, "企業間 關係模型의 開發에 관한 연구 : 마아케팅 戰略的 有效性을 중심으로", 박사, 경영학, pp.1992
  2. 박근완, "K-Means Clustering을 통한 공급사슬 상의 기업간 관계관리 연구: 의존성, 갈등, 신뢰를 중심으로", 대한경영학회지, 27(6), pp.861~879 (2014), 대한경영학회
  3. 박근호, "중소수출기업과 해외유통기업 간 관계품질 선행요인에 관한 연구", 대한경영학회지, 25(4), pp.1939~1957 (2012), 대한경영학회[DOI]
  4. 배희성, "한국 수출기업의 환경협력 상호작용이 성과에 미치는 영향", 해운물류연구, 30(4), pp.1043~1068 (2014), 한국해운물류학회
  5. 백영미, "수출제조기업과 해외유통업체 간 관계의 질에 관한 연구", 무역학회지, 36(1), pp.107~143 (2011), 한국무역학회
  6. 윤광운, "통관서비스 제공업체의 관계지향성이 고객서비스 성과에 미치는 영향", 해운물류연구, 50, pp.157~180 (2006), 한국해운물류학회
  7. 이국용, "파트너기업과의 관계가 외부협력과 기업 간 지식공유에 미치는 영향", 대한경영학회지 춘계학술발표대회 발표논문집, pp.409~424 (2012), 대한경영학회
  8. 표정호, "글로벌시대의 새로운 기업간관계 패러다임: 글로벌 네트워크를 통한 협력관계 구축을 중심으로", 순천향사회과학연구, 1(1), pp.83~101 (1995), 순청향대학교
  9. Anderson, E., "The Use of Pledges to build and Sustain Commitment in Distribution Channels", Journal of Marketing Research, 29, pp.18~34 (1992)
  10. Armstrong, J.S., "Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys", Journal of Marketing Research, 14, pp.396~402 (1977)
  11. 배희성, "The Inuencing Factors of Logistics Integration and Customer Service Performance for Value Creation of Port Logistics Firms", The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 28(3), pp.345~368 (2012), 한국해운물류학회
  12. 배희성, "An analysis of gaps in performance among development stages of integration in SCM", Journal of International Logistics and Trade, 10(3), pp.85~104 (2012), 정석물류통상연구원
  13. Bae, H. S., "Investigating the Effect of Environmental Uncertainty on Supply Chain Collaboration and Operational Performance", Ph.D., pp.2014
  14. Bagchi, P. K., "Supply Chain Integration : a European Survey", The International Journal of Logistics Management, 16, pp.275~294 (2005)
  15. Braunscheidel, M.J., "The Organizational Antecedents of a Firm’s Supply Chain Agility for Risk Mitigation and Response", Journal of Operations Management, 27, pp.119~140 (2009)
  16. Brewer, P.C., "Using the Balanced Scorecard to Measure Supply Chain Performance", Journal of Business Logistics, 21, pp.75~94 (2000)
  17. Brown, J.R., "Measures of Manifest Conflict in Distribution Channels", Journal of Marketing Research, 18, pp.263~274 (1981)
  18. Chen, H., "Supply Chain Process Integration: A Theoretical Framework", Journal of Business Logistics, 30, pp.27~46 (2009)
  19. Danese, P., "Supply Chain Integration and Efficiency Performance: A Study on the Interactions between Customer and Supplier Integration", Supply Chain Management; An International Journal, 16, pp.220~230 (2011)
  20. Daugherty, P. J., "Marketing", Logistics Relationships : Influence on Capabilities and Performance, 2009, pp.30, 1~18
  21. Daugherty, P. J., "INtegrated Logistics: Achieving Logistics Performance Improvements", Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 1, pp.25~33 (1996)
  22. Droge, C., "The Effects of Internal versus External Integration Practices on Time-based Performance and Overall Firm Performance", Journal of Operations Management, 22, pp.557~573 (2004)
  23. Ellinger, A. E., "Improving Marketing", Logistics Cross-Functional Collaboration in the Supply Chain, 2000, pp.29, 85~96
  24. Flynn, B. B., "The Impact of Supply Chain Integration on Performance: A Contingency and Configuration Approach", Journal of Operations Management, 28, pp.58~71 (2010)
  25. Gimenez, C., "Logistics Integration Processes in the Food Industry", International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 36, pp.231~249 (2006)
  26. Gimenez, C., "Logistics-Production, Logistics-Marketing and External Integration: Their Impact on Performance", International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 25, pp.231~249 (2005)
  27. Frohlich, M.T., "Arcs of Integration: An International Study of Supply Chain Strategies", Journal of Operations Management, 19, pp.185~200 (2001)
  28. Fynes, B., "Environmental Uncertainty, Supply Chain Relationship Quality and Performance", Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 10, pp.179~190 (2004)
  29. Hymer, S. H., "The Large Multinational Corporation: An Analysis of Some Motives for the International Integration of Business", Review Economique, 19, pp.8~29 (1968)
  30. Iyer, K. N. S., "Demand Chain Collaboration and Operational Performance: Role of IT Analytic Capability and Environmental Uncertainty", Journal of Business and Industry Marketing, 26, pp.81~91 (2011)
  31. Kim, S. W., "The Effect of Supply Chain Integration on the Alignment between Corporate Competitive Capability and Supply Chain Operational Capability", International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 26, pp.1084~1107 (2006)
  32. Mollenkopf, D., "The Integration of Marketing and Logistics Functions: An Empirical Examination of New Zealand Firms", Journal of Business Logistics, 21, pp.89~112 (2000)
  33. Morash, E.A., "Supply Chain Integration: Customer Value throough Collaborative Closeness versus Operational Excellence", Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 6, pp.104~120 (1998)
  34. Narasimhan, R., "Information System Utilization Strategy for Supply Chain Integration", Journal of Business Logistics, 22, pp.51~75 (2001)
  35. Nunnally, J., "Psychometric Theory" (1978), McGrow-Hill
  36. Paulraj, A., "Strategic Buyer-Seller Relationships, Information Technology and External Logistics Integration", Journal of Supply Chain Management, 43, pp.2~14 (2007)
  37. Porter, M., "Competitive Strategy" (1980), Free Press
  38. Schoenherr, T., "Revisiting the Arcs of Integration : Cross-Validations and Extensions", Journal of Operations Management, 30, pp.99~115 (2012)
  39. Stank, T. P., "Marketing", Logistics Integration and Firm Performance, 1999, pp.10, 11~24
  40. Stank, T. P., "Supply Chain Collablration and Logistical Service Performance", Journal of Business Logistics, 22, pp.29~48 (2001)
  41. Stevens, G. C., "Integrating the Supply Chain", International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 19, pp.3~8 (1989)
  42. Stock, G.N., "External Technology Integration in Product and Process Development", International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 24, pp.642~665 (2004)
  43. Thomas, H., "Research on Strategic Groups: Progress and Prognosis", Journal of Management Studies, 25, pp.537~555 (1988)
  44. Thun, J. H., "Angles of Integration: An Empirical Analysis of the Alignment of Internet-based Information Technology and Global Supply Chain Integration", Journal of Supply Chain Management, 46, pp.30~44 (2010)
  45. Williamson, O. E., "Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications" (1975), The Free Press

관련 논문AI추천

해외진출 한국 제조기업의 공급사슬협력의 수준에 따른 공급사슬성과의 차이분석배희성, 신수용한국해양수산개발원 · 해양정책연구2018 · 제33권 제1호공급사슬의 협력과 성과: 대기업, 중견기업, 중소기업 비교연구이수열한국중소기업학회 · 중소기업연구2015 · 제37권 제4호한국수출기업의 공급사슬파트너십 수준과 성과에 관한 실증연구문희철, 이진석사회과학연구소 · 사회과학연구2008 · 제34권 제2호한국 수출기업의 환경협력 상호작용이 성과에 미치는 영향배희성, 이양기, 이우영한국해운물류학회 · 해운물류연구2014 · 제30권 제4호공급사슬지향성이 물류협력에 미치는 영향 - 국내기업의 기업규모 차이에 따른 연구 -이창훈, 하병천한국해운물류학회 · 해운물류연구2011 · 제27권 제4호한국 수출기업의 공급사슬관리 지수의 개발과 분석배희성, 신수용한국해양수산개발원 · 해양정책연구2019 · 제34권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)

선박 대형화에 따른 선박 제원 예측에 관한 연구원승환, 조성우, 이주호pp. 507-528시황 변동에 따른 선박투자패턴 분석에 관한 연구여기태, 이태휘pp. 529-547변이할당분석을 이용한 광양항과 인천항의 수출구조 분석모수원, 정홍영, 이광배pp. 549-567UAE 항만산업의 분석과 시사점정태원pp. 567-585한국 물류산업의 효율성과 생산성: 비모수적 기법과 모수적 기법의 적용김창범pp. 587-620
원문 보기