임상판단 평가도구의 신뢰도 및 타당도 검증
The Reliability and Validity of the Lasater Clinical Judgement Rubric in Korean Nursing Students
0
조회
0
다운로드
18
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: This study was done to evaluate the Lasater Clinical Judgement Rubric for use with Korean nursing students. Methods: A methodological study was used to validate the rubric developed by Lasater to assess clinical judgment during nursing simulation. Participants were 34 nursing students at K University in Seoul. Between February and May, 2012, analysis was done of 91 video clips recording performance during simulation. Results: Findings showed reliability and validity of the rubric. For internal consistency, Cronbach‘s α score was .884 and intraclass correlation coefficient was .839, which established reliability. The rubric was validated using the exploratory factor analysis and content validity. The content validity score was 83%, establishing the appropriateness and readiness of the tool. Factor analysis showed that noticing, responding, and reflecting domains had Eigen values of 2.669, 1.991, and 2.912, respectively and were bound, but unlike the original tool in which four factors noticing, interpretation, responding, and reflecting domains were bound. Conclusion: Results of the study indicate that the rubric shows acceptable reliability and validity in Korean nursing students. This evaluation tool for nursing simulation allows nursing faculty to objectively evaluate students’ clinical judgment as well as students to reflect on their clinical judgment process during simulation.
Abstract
Purpose: This study was done to evaluate the Lasater Clinical Judgement Rubric for use with Korean nursing students. Methods: A methodological study was used to validate the rubric developed by Lasater to assess clinical judgment during nursing simulation. Participants were 34 nursing students at K University in Seoul. Between February and May, 2012, analysis was done of 91 video clips recording performance during simulation. Results: Findings showed reliability and validity of the rubric. For internal consistency, Cronbach‘s α score was .884 and intraclass correlation coefficient was .839, which established reliability. The rubric was validated using the exploratory factor analysis and content validity. The content validity score was 83%, establishing the appropriateness and readiness of the tool. Factor analysis showed that noticing, responding, and reflecting domains had Eigen values of 2.669, 1.991, and 2.912, respectively and were bound, but unlike the original tool in which four factors noticing, interpretation, responding, and reflecting domains were bound. Conclusion: Results of the study indicate that the rubric shows acceptable reliability and validity in Korean nursing students. This evaluation tool for nursing simulation allows nursing faculty to objectively evaluate students’ clinical judgment as well as students to reflect on their clinical judgment process during simulation.
참고문헌 (30)
- Adamson, K. A., "Assessing the reliability of simulation evaluation instruments used in nursing education: A test of concept study", 박사, pp.2011
- Adamson, K. A., "Assessing the reliability, validity, and use of the Lasater clinical judgment rubric : Three approaches", Journal of Nursing Education, 51(2), pp.66~73 (2012)[DOI]
- Cannon-Diehl, M. R., "Simulation in healthcare and nursing: State of the science", Critical Care Nursing Quarterly, 32(2), pp.128~136 (2009)[DOI]
- Costello, A. B., "Best practices in exploratory factor analysis : Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment", Research & Evaluation, 10(7), pp.1~9 (2005)
- Davis, A. H., "Human patient simulation evaluation rubrics for nursing education : Measuring the essentials of baccalaureate education for professional nursing practice", Journal of Nursing Education, 50(11), pp.605~611 (2011)[DOI]
- Haskvitz, L. M., "Students struggling in clinical? A new role for the patient simulator", Journal of Nursing Education, 43(4), pp.181~184 (2004)
- Jeffries, P. R., "Simulation in nursing education" (2005), National League for Nursing
- Kardong-Edgren, S., "A review of currently published evaluation instruments for human patient simulation", Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 6(1), pp.25~35 (2010)[DOI]
- 김미원, "핵심간호능력 중심 간호학실습교육목표 개발", Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 36(2), pp.389~402 (2006), 한국간호과학회
- 김성희, "간호대학생의 비판적 사고성향, 문제해결과정 정도 및 아동간호시뮬레이션 기반 임상수행능력", Child Health Nursing Research, 20(4), pp.294~303 (2014), 한국아동간호학회[DOI]
- 권인수, "아동간호학 임상실습교육 현황", Child Health Nursing Research, 8(3), pp.344~356 (2002), 한국아동간호학회
- Lasater, K., "Clinical judgment development : Using simulation to create an assessment rubric", Journal of Nursing Education, 46(11), pp.496~503 (2007)
- Lasater, K., "Clinical judgment : The last frontier for evaluation", Nurse Education in Practice, 11(2), pp.86~92 (2011)
- 이주희, "시뮬레이션을 적용한 임상추론 교과목의 적용효과: 일 대학의 예를 중심으로", 성인간호학회지, 23(1), pp.1~9 (2011), 성인간호학회
- 이주희, "일 대학 간호대학생의 시뮬레이션 교육 경험 분석", 한국간호교육학회지, 15(2), pp.183~193 (2009), 한국간호교육학회
- Mariani, B., "Structured debriefing and students’ clinical judgment abilities in simulation", Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 9(5), pp.147~155 (2012)[DOI]
- McCaughey, C. S., "The role of simulation in nurse education", Nurse Education Today, 30(8), pp.827~832 (2010)[DOI]
- Moskal, B. M., "Scoring rubric development : Validity and reliability. Practical Assessment", Research & Evaluation, 7(10), pp.71~81 (2000)
- Nehring, W. M., "Current use and opinions regarding human patient simulators in nursing education : An international survey", Nursing Education Perspectives, 25(5), pp.244~248 (2004)
- Nunnally, J. C., "Psychometric Theory" (1994), McGraw-Hill
- Rauen, C. A., "Simulation as a teaching strategy for nursing education and orientation in cardiac surgery", Critical Care Nurse, 24(3), pp.46~51 (2004)
- Rhodes, M. L., "Use of the human patient simulator to teach clinical judgment skills in a baccalaureate nursing program", Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 23(5), pp.256~262 (2005)
- 서연옥, "간호학생의 임상적 판단 경험에 관한 내용분석", 성인간호학회지, 21(2), pp.245~256 (2009), 성인간호학회
- Shin, H., "Evaluation of an integrated simulation courseware in pediatric nursing practicum", Journal of Nursing Education, 53(10), pp.589~594 (2014)[DOI]
- Shin, H., "The Korean version of the Lasater clinical judgment rubric: A validation study", Nurse Education Today, 35(1), pp.68~72[DOI]
- 신현숙, "간호활동을 중심으로 한 아동간호시뮬레이션 실습 분석", Child Health Nursing Research, 19(2), pp.111~119 (2013), 한국아동간호학회[DOI]
- Shin, H., "Validation of a new assessment tool for a pediatric nursing simulation module", Journal of Nursing Education, 53(11), pp.623~629 (2014)[DOI]
- Sideras, S., "An Examination of the Construct Validity of a Clinical Judgment Evaluation Tool in the Setting of High-Fidelity Simulation", 박사, pp.2007
- Suzie, K. E., "A review of currently published evaluation instruments for human patient simulation", Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 6(1), pp.25~35 (2010)[DOI]
- Tanner, C., "Thinking like a nurse : A research-based model of clinical judgment in nursing", Journal of Nursing Education, 45(6), pp.204~211 (2006)