도시목조화를 위한 목재에 대한 국민 인식 분석 연구
A Study on the Analysis of the Perception Survey on the Utilization of Wood for Wood Urbanism
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study was conducted to efficiently manage wood urbanism by empirically analyzing the perception of wood on the subject of wood urbanism. The survey consisted of four sub-indicators: 1) interest, 2) living environment, 3) living culture, and 4) education related to wood. As a result, in terms of interest in wood, most of the survey respondents positively evaluated the use of wood, but the general characteristics of wood and the positive effects of wood use were not clearly known. In addition, most respondents recognized that wood is primarily used as a furniture material in their living environment. Most of the respondents would think that the use of wood is very limited because it is rarely used in building materials or other household items. There is little or no experience in wood-related hobbies and experience activities, and education experiences are also rarely seen, confirming that there are not many opportunities to deal with wood or learn about wood. Therefore, in order to realize wood urbanism, education and publicity related to wood should be preceded, and a system that can provide wood experience opportunity should be established so that the people can realize wood urbanism.
Abstract
This study was conducted to efficiently manage wood urbanism by empirically analyzing the perception of wood on the subject of wood urbanism. The survey consisted of four sub-indicators: 1) interest, 2) living environment, 3) living culture, and 4) education related to wood. As a result, in terms of interest in wood, most of the survey respondents positively evaluated the use of wood, but the general characteristics of wood and the positive effects of wood use were not clearly known. In addition, most respondents recognized that wood is primarily used as a furniture material in their living environment. Most of the respondents would think that the use of wood is very limited because it is rarely used in building materials or other household items. There is little or no experience in wood-related hobbies and experience activities, and education experiences are also rarely seen, confirming that there are not many opportunities to deal with wood or learn about wood. Therefore, in order to realize wood urbanism, education and publicity related to wood should be preceded, and a system that can provide wood experience opportunity should be established so that the people can realize wood urbanism.
참고문헌 (7)
- 김기동, "국산 목재 공급 확대를 위한 정책과 미래전망", 농업생명과학연구, 47(5), pp.43~53 (2013), 농업생명과학연구원
- 김민지, "공공시설물의 목조화에 따른 탄소 저장 능력 평가 - 서울로 7017 분석을 중심으로 -", 한국가구학회지, 30(4), pp.312~318 (2019), 한국가구학회[DOI]
- 김수택, "표본조사설계", pp.240~ (2010), 자유아카데미
- 도시재생사업단, "역사와 문화를 활용한 도시재생이야기", pp.360~ (2012), 한울
- 산림청, "제48호 임업통계연보", pp.444~ (2018), 산림청
- 산림청, "제2차 목재이용종합계획", pp.60~64 (2019), 산림청
- Montgomery, C, "Happy City", pp.368~ (2014), Farrar Straus & Giroux
