加耶·新羅古墳의 年代觀

Abstract

This is a paper of critical review on the problems of retroactively applied absolute date in Three Kingdoms Period by applying the Japanese chronological standpoint to Korea intactly. I try to give a supplementary explanation of my chronological standpoint as well. It is rare which shows absolute date in archaeology of Three Kingdoms Period. King Muryeong’s tomb where the memorial inscription was excavated is sore. The materials from this tomb should be an important indicator for setting absolute date. However, it is qualified to apply because of the character of the grave goods. It makes regional korean researcher has got different chronological standpoint. As a result, there is a gap of about 100 years among them. Recently, it tends to retroact the chronological standpoint in Japan by the scientific methods such as tree-ring dating, radiocarbon dating with wiggle-matching and volcanic ash dating based on the ‘Yamataikoku - Ginki theory’. Thus there has been attempts to apply the Japanese chronological standpoint to Korea instantly. In this paper, I indicate the problems of the basis of the Japanese chronological standpoint and applying the scientific methods to archaeology. I analyze critically discussion of crossdating with TG232 type, grave goods of Yinariyama Tomb, Saitama and Edahunayama Tomb,Kumamoto and it’s interpretation as well as quotation problem of chronologic materials of Goguryo and Baekjae. Finally, based on set the chronological position of Bokcheondong No.10 tomb and Okjeon M3 tomb, I reconfirm my possibility of Korea-Japan chronologic mediation by checking some examples of coexistence of Suheki and horse harness in Yongnam.