论新消费时代的微正义及其实现方式 -兼议ODR发展的中国路径-
Access to Micro-justice in the New Consumption Era and the Development Route for China’s ODR
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
互联网技术创造了人类消费的新空间，以“涉案标的小额化、纠纷主体远程化”为特征的网购纠纷随之迅速蔓延。包括代表人诉讼、小额诉讼、公益诉讼等在内的传统诉讼制度囿于自身痼疾和司法环境的掣肘而几乎应对失灵，以便捷、灵活、高效等优势著称的ADR亦未能幸免于难。为克服线上纠纷线下解决的根本性障碍，网购纠纷解决方式的设计应注重与互联技术的融合，同时立足我国基本国情，建立法院附设不公开报价机制等在线非诉讼纠纷解决机制，并与诉讼制度相衔接，确保网购消费者以高效、低廉、权威的方式实现微正义。
Abstract
Internet technology has created a new consumption space for human beings. Whereas, numerous disputes from online purchase spread rapidly, with features of small claims and long distance. Due to the inherent drawbacks and poor judicial environment, the traditional civil litigation systems, including representative litigation, small claims litigation and public interest litigation, are not able to deal with these online disputes, so are the alternative dispute resolutions, which have been well known as their convenience, flexibility, efficiency, and so on. Therefore, Internet technology should be considered and made use to design a dispute resolution for online purchase, so as to overcome the difficulties of resolving online disputes through an offline way. Given to the reality of China, online ADR mechanisms such as court sponsored blind bidding with reasonable cohesion to civil litigation should be suitable for realizing micro-justice in an efficient, inexpensive and authoritative way for online consumers.
참고문헌 (23)
- 段文波, "日美现代型诉讼比较", 社会科学研究, (1) (2007)
- MICKLITZ HANS-W., "The Development of Collective Legal Actions in Europe, especially in German Civil Procedure", European Business Law Review (2006)
- "2016年度中国网络零售市场数据监测报告"[URL]
- "2015年度中国电子商务用户体验与投诉监测报告"[URL]
- 程建华, "困境与应对：电子商务模式创新中的消费者权益保护", 国家行政学院学报, (6) (2015)
- 范愉, "集团诉讼问题研究" (2005), 北京大学出版社
- 王福华, "代表人诉讼中的利益诉求", 法学, (6) (2006)
- 郑世保, "在线纠纷解决机制的困境与对策", 法律科学, (6) (2013)
- 唐力, "小额诉讼的实证分析", 国家检察官学院学报, (2) (2014)
- 胡道才, "小额诉讼程序的现实反思与规制", 中国民事诉讼法学研究会2013年会论文集
- 段思明, "新民事诉讼法小额诉讼程序规定对民事司法的影响", 中国民事诉讼法学研究会2013年会论文集
- 王福华, "小额诉讼与福利制度", 中外法学, (1) (2016)
- 齐树洁, "小额诉讼:从理念到规则", 海峡法学, (1) (2013)
- 熊跃敏, "消费者群体性损害赔偿诉讼的类型化分析", 中国法学, (1) (2014)
- 方双复, "公益诉讼的门槛到底应多高:从我国消费公益诉讼第一案说起", 中国律师, (4) (2015)
- 齐树洁, "司法改革与接近正义——写在民事诉讼法修改之后", 黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报, (1) (2013)
- 申欣旺, "淘宝网的纠纷解决经验及其司法借鉴价值", 浙江审判, (11) (2015)
- 胡琦旸, "法院搭建在线矛盾纠纷多元化解平台——让老百姓’一次都不用跑", 西湖报 (2017)
- "创新在线纠纷解决平台建设"[URL]
- 罗金寿, "试点如何推进司法改革", 云南大学学报(法学版), (2) (2008)
- Lucille M. Ponte, "Cyber Justice Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) for E-Commerce", Pearson Prentice Hall
- 小岛武司, "自律性社会与正义的综合体系——小岛武司先生七十华诞纪念文集" (2006), 中国法制出版社
- 汤瑜, "浙江杭州西湖法院’在线矛盾纠纷多元化解平台’成效显著", 民主与法制时报, (108) (2017)