한국 헌법재판소와 미국 연방대법원의 헌법해석의 비교연구
The Comparative Study of Constitutional Interpretation between Korea Constitutional Court and United States America Federal Supreme Court
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
이 글은 미국 연방대법원과 한국 헌법재판소의 주요 헌법판례의 동향에 대하여 비교 고찰한다. 우선, 215년 동안 미국 연방대법원은 공식 사법제도로서 헌법해석을 통하여 의회와 대통령 및 연방(주) 정부 간의 권력분립과 효율적인 정부구조의 연방주의를 달성하고, 나아가미국의 민주주의와 법치주의 그리고 시민의 인권신장에 기여하고 있다. 연방대법원이 대통령의 정치적 영향력을 희석시키는 사법제도로서 헌법해석방법에 의하여 권력분립원칙과연방주의에 관한 판례의 변화를 살펴본다. 한편, 지난 30년 동안 헌법재판소는 민주주의와 법치주의를 확립하는 헌법판례로서 인간존엄과 자유권적 기본권을 복원하는 동시에, 민주주의와 실질적 국민주권의 회복과 대통령탄핵심판 나아가 관습헌법을 이유로 권력분립에 반하는 헌법해석을 선고하였다. 아직 잔존한 권위적인 정치(헌법) 문화 아래에서 국회나 대통령의 정치적 영향으로부터 헌법재판의 독립성을 확보하기 위해서는 미국 연방대법원의 헌법해석의 함의가 중요하다.
Abstract
This paper examines the comparative constitution on the major constitutional precedents between the United States Supreme Court and the Korean Constitutional Court. First, the US Supreme Court analyzes the impact on American society through 215 major constitutional precedents. The Constitutional interpretation of the Constitution as a limitation of the judiciary system that dilutes the political influence of the President, who is nominated by the Justices of Supreme Court, who have achieved the separation of power among the Congress, the President, and the Federal Government, and the federalism of efficient governance of Federal and State Governments., Second, the Constitutional Court has been restricting human dignity and fundamental rights as a constitutional precedent that establishes democracy and the rule of law, while restoring democracy and real sovereignty, as well as constitutional interpretation contrary to separation of powers was sentenced. The implication of the Constitutional interpretation of the Supreme Court is important to secure the independence of the Constitutional Court from the political influence of the National Assembly or the President under the still authoritarian political culture so far. The analysis focuses on the impacts and limitations of the Constitutional Court in these judgments. Finally, we may examine the implication of the U.S. Supreme Court's interpretation toward to the Constitutional Court as a formal constraint.
참고문헌 (53)
- 김재균, "5. 18과 한국정치" (2000), 한울
- 김하열, "한국 헌법재판제도의 성과와 과제", 저스티스, 146(2), pp.94~113 (2015), 한국법학원
- 정영화, "헌법사회학" (2015), 전북대학교 출판문화원
- 정영화, "미국 연방대법원의 헌법해석의 진화와 쟁점", 홍익법학, 16(4), pp.87~119 (2015), 법학연구소[DOI]
- 정영화, "한국의 헌법문화와 헌법재판소의 헌법해석 - 미국 연방대법원의 헌법해석과 비교 -", 미국헌법연구, 27(1), pp.317~360 (2016), 미국헌법학회
- 정영화, "대통령 탄핵, ‘중대한’ 법위반 - 미국과 한국의 비교 -", 미국헌법연구, 27(3), pp.241~280 (2016), 미국헌법학회
- 헌법재판소에 의한 헌법재판이 우리 사회에 미친 영향, "헌법재판소", 헌법재판소, ~ (2010)
- Albert P. Blaustein, "Rating Supreme Court Justices", A.B.A. Journal, 58 (1972)
- Albert P. Blaustein, "The First One Hundred Justice: Statistical Studies on The Supreme Court of The United States" (1978), Archon Books
- Armin von Bogdandy, "The Past and Promise of Doctrinal Constructivism: A Stretegy for Responding to the Challenges Facing Constitutional Scholarship in Europe", International Journal of Constitutional Law, 7(3) (2009)
- Arthur S. Miller, "Break the Monopoly of Lawyers on the Supreme Court", Vand. Law Review, 305 (1986)
- Bruce Ackerman, "Reconstructing American Law" (1984), Harvard University Press
- Bruce Ackerman, "The Rise of World Constitutionalism", Virginia Law Review (1997)
- Must Formalism Be Defended Empirically?, Chicago Working Paper in Law and Economics, "Cass R. Sunstein", ~
- Douglas P. Kommers, "The Constitutional Jurisprudence of the Federal Republic of Germany 1" (2012)
- Duncan Kennedy, "Form and Substance in Private Law Adjudication", Harvard Law Review, 89 (1976)
- Edgar Bodenheimer, "Jurisptudence: The Philosophy and Method of The Law" (1974)
- Edling M. M., "A Revolution in Favor of Government: Origins of the U.S. Constitution and the Making of the American State" (2008), Oxford University Press
- Erwin Chemerinsky, "Getting Beyond Formalism In Constitutional Law: Constitutional Theory Matters", Oklahoma Law Review, 54(1) (2001)
- Frank H. Easterbrook, "Formalism, Functionalism, Ignorance, Judges", Harvard Journal Law & Public Plicy, 22 (1998)
- Frederick Schauer, "Formalism", Yale Law Journal, 97(4) (1988)
- Henry M. Hart, Jr., "The Legal Process" (1994)
- Herbert Wechsler, "Toward Neutral Principles of Constitutional Law", Harvard Law Review, 73(1) (1959)
- H.S. Reiss, "The Political Thought of the German Romantics 1793-1815" (1955)
- Ingo Müller, "Hitler’s Justice: The Courts of the Third Reich" (1991), Harvard University Press
- Isaac Ehrlich, "An Economic Analysis of Legal Rule-making", Journal of Legal Studies, 3 (1974)
- Jack Balkin, "The American Constitution as "Our Law"", Yale Journal of Law & Humanities, 25(1) (2013)
- Jack Balkin, "Living Originalism" (2011), The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press
- Jed Rubenfeld, "Unilateralism and Constitutionalism", N.Y.U. Law Review, 79, pp.1971~ (2003)
- Josef Kohler, "Philosophy of Law" (1964)
- Jürgen Habermas, "Between Facts and Norms, Contributions To A Discourse Theory Of Law and Democracy" (1996), MIT Press
- Constitutional Interpretation after Regimes of Horror, "Kim L. Scheppele", U. Penn. Law School, ~, pp.Public Law Working Paper No.5 (2000)
- Kim Scheppele, "Jack Balkin is an American", Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities, 25 (2013)
- Larry Ray, "Introduction to Culture and Economy after the Cultural Turn 1", pp.1~3 (1999)
- Laurence Tribe, "American Constitutional Law" (1988), Harvard University Press
- Louis Kaplow, "Rules Versus Standards : An Economic Analysis", Duke Law Journal, 42 (1992)
- Menachem Mautner, "Three Approach To Law And Culture", Cornell Law Review, 96 (2011)
- Michael Herz, "Purposivism and Institutional Competence in Statutory Interpretation", Michigan State Law Review, 89 (2009)
- Michelman I, Frank, "A Brief Anatomy of Adjudicative Rule-Formalism", Chicago Law Review, 66 (1999)
- Norman Dorsen, "The Selection of U.S. Supreme Court Justices", I CON, 4(4) (2006)
- Oliver Lepsius, "The Quest for Middle Range Theories in German Public Law", International Journal of Constitutional Law, 12(3) (2014)
- Peter Lee, "Patent Law and the Two Cultures", Yale Law Journal, 120 (2010)
- Philippe Nonet, "Law & Society in Transition" (2005), Transaction Publishers
- Richard A. Posner, "Legal Formalism, Legal Realism, and the Interpretation of Statutes and The Constitution", Case Western Reserve Law Review, 37(2) (1987)
- Robert Alexy, "A Theory of Constitutional Rights" (2009), Oxford University Press
- Robert Alexy, "A Theory of Constitutional Rights" (2010), Oxford University Press
- Roger Berkowitz, "The Gift of Science : Leibniz and The Modern Legal Tradition" (2005)
- Ronald M. Dworkin, "The Model of Rules", Chicago Law Review, 35(14) (1967)
- Roscoe Pound, "Interpretations of Legal History" (1923)
- Sidney W. DeLong, "Placid Clear-Seeming Words: Some Realism About the New Formalism", San Diego Law Review, 38(13) (2001)
- Sidney W. DeLong, "Placid, Clear-Seeming Words: Some Realism About the New Formalism (With Particular Reference to Promissory Estoppel)", San Diego Law Review, 38 (2001)
- Victoria E. Bonnell, "Introduction to Beyond the Cultural Turn: New Directions In The Study of Society And Culture, 1", pp.2~4 (1999)
- William N. Eskridge, Jr., "Relationships between Formalism and Functionalism in Separation of Power Cases", Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 22 (1998)