미국 연방대법원의 헌법해석의 진화와 쟁점

키워드

참고문헌 (106)

1. 국순옥, "헌법재판관들의 사법쿠데타", 민주법학, (27) (2005)
2. 김대휘, "헌법해석과 법실무", 헌법문제와 재판 (상), 법관세미나자료 (1996), 사법연수원
3. 김형남, "헌법재판과 헌법해석의 상호관계에 관한 연구", 헌법학연구, 9(2), pp.245~271 (2003), 한국헌법학회
4. 박성우, "민주주의와 헌정주의의 갈등과 조화: 미국헌법 해석에 있어서 원본주의(Originalism) 논쟁의 의미와 역할", 한국정치학회보, 40(3), pp.55~78 (2006), 한국정치학회
5. 박은정, "‘정치의 사법화(司法化)’와 민주주의", 서울대학교 법학, 51(1), pp.1~26 (2010), 법학연구소
6. 양 건, "미국의 사법심사제와 80년대 한국의 헌법재판- 사법적극주의론과 관련하여", 서울대법학, 29(3) (1988)
7. 양 건, "김철수교수화갑기념논문집" (1993), 박영사
8. 유은정, "정치의 사법화와 사법의 정치화: 온건하고 실용적인 헌법재판의 당위성 - 리차드 포즈너의 이론을 중심으로 -", 헌법학연구, 17(3), pp.241~288 (2011), 한국헌법학회
9. Henry J. Abraham, "기본적 인권과 재판" (1992), 이화여대출판부
10. 이계일, "헌법해석에 있어 법과 사회의 상호작용: 볼킨(J. Balkin) 법이론에 있어 헌법해석주체의 다원적 확장과 위헌심사의 민주적 정당성 기초", 법과사회, (42), pp.251~288 (2012), 법과사회이론학회[DOI]
11. 이명웅, "민주주의와 헌법재판", 헌법논총, 18 (2007)
12. 이시윤, "헌법재판 10년의 회고와 전망", 공법연구, 27(3) (1999)
13. 음선필, "유기천과 한국법학" (2014), 법문사
14. 이회창, "사법의 적극주의- 특히 기본권보장기능과 관련하여", 서울대 법학, 28(2) (1987)
15. 임지봉, "사법적극주의와 사법권 독립" (2006), 철학과 현실사
16. 정영화, "헌법" (2011), 도서출판 일조사
17. 정영화, "헌법사회학" (2015), 전북대학교 출판문화원
18. 전원열, "민주주의와 법원의 위헌심사" (2006), 나남출판
19. 정태욱, "법치주의와 사법부의 독립-‘민주주의 후퇴’ 시대의 법철학적 단상-", 법학연구, 12(3), pp.37~64 (2009), 법학연구소
20. 조홍식, "사법통치의 정당성과 한계" (2009), 박영사
21. 차동욱, "헌법재판소는 국회의 안티테제인가:현대적 권력분립원리하에서의 두 헌법기관의 관계", 의정연구, 12(2), pp.183~221 (2006), 한국의회발전연구회
22. 최대권, "민주주의와 법치주의-헌법재판의 정치학", 헌법논총, 19 (2008)
23. 한상희, "미국에서의 사법심사의 준거- 헌법의 해석학을 중심으로", 미국헌법연구, (9) (1998)
24. 韓尙熙, "司法決定行態에 관한 經驗的 硏究", 박사, 법학, pp.1993
25. 함재학, "정치의 사법화와 헌법재판의 정치화 ― 세계적 보편성과 한국적 특수성 ―", 헌법학연구, 17(3), pp.289~329 (2011), 한국헌법학회
26. 함재학, "헌법재판의 정치성에 대하여* - “헌법적 대화” 모델을 위한 제언 -", 헌법학연구, 16(3), pp.613~651 (2010), 한국헌법학회
27. 함재학, "드워킨의 헌법사상: 헌법적 통합성과 파트너십 민주주의", 법철학연구, 12(1), pp.183~222 (2009), 한국법철학회
28. 헌법재판소, "헌법재판소에 의한 헌법재판이 우리 사회에 미친 영향" (2010), 헌법재판소
29. Antonin Scalia, "Fidelity in Constitutional Theory", Fordham Law Review, 65 (1997)
30. Antonin Scalia, "Originalism, Democracy, and The Constitution", Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 19 (1996)
31. Antonin Scalia, "Textualism and the Constitution", George Washington Law Review, 66 (1998)
32. Antonin Scalia, "A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law" (1997), Princeton Univ. Press
33. Antonin. Scalia, "Originalism: the Lesser Evil", Univ. Cincinnati Law Review, 57 (1989)
34. B. Ackerman, "The Constitution Outside the Constitution", Yale L. J, 117 (2007)
35. Berger Raoul, "Congress v. The Supreme Court" (1969), Harvard Univ. Press
36. Berger Raoul, "Government by Judiciary: The Transformation of the Fourteenth Amendment" (1977), Harvard University. Press
37. Brest Paul, "The Misconceived Quest for the Original Understanding", Boston Law Review, 60 (1980)
38. Bret Boyce, "Originalism and the Fourteenth Amendment", Wake Forest Law Review, 33 (1998)
39. Brest Paul, "The Misconceived Quest for the Original Understanding", Boston University Law Review, 60 (1980)
40. Bruuce Ackerman, "The Rise of World Constitutionalism", Virginia Law Review, 83, pp.779~780 (1997)
41. Must Formalism Be Defended Empirically?, Chicago Working Paper in Law and Economics, "Cass R. Sunstein", ~ (2001)
42. Cover, "Dialectical Federalism: Habeas Corpus and the Court", Yale Law Journal, 86 (1977)
43. David A. Strauss, "The Living Constitution" (2010), Oxford Univ. Press
44. David S. Law, "Judicial Comparativism and Judicial Diplomacy", Univ. of Penn. Law Review, 163 (2015)
45. Douglas P. Kommers, "The Constitutional Jurisprudence of the Federal Republic of Germany1 (3rd ed.)" (2012)
46. Ducan Kennedy, "Form and Substance in Private Law Adjudication", Harvard Law Review, 89 (1976)
47. E. A. Young, "The Constitution Outside the Constitution", Yale Law Journal, 117 (2007)
48. Ely John Hart, "Democracy and Distrust: Theory of Judicial Review" (1980), Harvard Univ. Press
49. Erwin Chemerinsky, "Getting Beyond Formalism In Constitutional Law: Constitutional Theory Matters", Oklahoma Law Review, 54(1) (2001)
50. Erwin Chemerinsky, "The Case Against The Supreme Court" (2014), Penguin Books
51. Frank H. Easterbrook, "Formalism, Functionalism, Ignorance, Judges", Harvard Journal Law & Public Plicy, 22 (1998)
52. Frederick Schauer, "Formalism", Yale Law Journal, 97(4) (1988)
53. Frederik Schauer, "Playing by the Rules" (1994), Oxford University Press
54. Grey C. Thomas, "Do we have an unwritten Constitution?", Stanford Law Review, 27 (1975)
55. Grey C. Thomas, "Origins of the Unwritten Constitution: Fundamental Law in American Revolutionary Thought", Stanford Law Review, 30 (1978)
56. H.L.A. Hart, "The Concept of Law, Clarendon 2d. ed." (1994), Oxford University Press
57. Herbert Wechsler, "Toward Neutral Principles of Constitutional Law", Harvard Law Review, 73 (1959)
58. Ingo Müller, "Hitler’s Justice: The Courts of the Third Reich" (1991), Harvard University Press
59. Isaac Ehrlich, "An Economic Analysis of Legal Rulemaking", Journal of Legal Studies, 3 (1974)
60. J. Waldron, "The Core of the Case Against Judicial Review", Yale Law Journal, 115 (2006)
61. Jack Balkin, "Framework Originalism and the Living Constitution", Northwestern Law Review, 103 (2009)
62. Jack Balkin, "Original Meaning and Constitutional Redemption", Constitutional Commentary, 24 (2007)
63. Jack Balkin, "The Demestication of Law and Literature", Law and Social Inquiry, 14 (1989)
64. Jack Balkin, "Transcendental Deconstruction, Transcendent Justice", Michigan Law Review, 92 (1994)
65. Jack Balkin, "What is a Post-modern Constitutionalism?", Michigan L.R, 90 (1992)
66. Framework Originalism and The Living Constitution, Public Law & Legal Theory Research Paper Series, "Jack Balkin", ~ (2009)
67. Jack Balkin, "Constitutional Redemption: Political Faith in An Unjust World" (2011), Harvard Univ. Press
68. Jack M. Balkin, "Living Originalism" (2011), The Belknap Press of Harvard Univ. Press
69. Jed Rubenfeld, "Unilateralism and Constitutionalism", N.Y.U. Law Review, 79 (2003)
70. Jiunn-Rong Yeh, "The Changing Landscape of Modern Constitutionalism: Transitional Perspective", National Taiwan University Law Review, 4(1) (2009)
71. Jürgen Habermas, "Between Facts and Norms, Contributions To A Discourse Theory Of Law and Democracy" (1996), MIT Press
72. Keith Whittington, "Dworkin’s Originalism: The Role of Intentions in Constitutional Interpretation", The Review of Politics, 62(2) (2000)
73. Keith Whittington, "Constitutional Construction: Divided Powers and Constitutional Meaning" (1999), Harvard University Press
74. Keith Whittington, "Constitutional Interpretation: Textual Meaning, Original Intent, and Judicial Review" (1999), University Press of Kansa
75. Cnstitutional Interpretation after Regimes of Horror, "Kim Scheppele", Univ. Penn. Law School, ~, pp.Public Law Working Paper No.5 (2000)
76. Louis Kaplow, "Rules Versus Standards: An Economic Analysis", Duke Law Journal, 42 (1992)
77. Laurence Tribe, "American Constitutional Law, 2d ed." (1988), Harvard University Press
78. Mark V. Tushnet, "Anti-Formalism In Recent Constitutional Theory", Michigan Law Review, 83(6) (1985)
79. Mark V. Tushnet, "Taking the Constitution Away from the Court" (1999), Princeton Univ. Press
80. Michael McConnell, "Originalism and the Desegregation Decisions", Virginia Law Review, 81 (1995)
81. Michael S. Moore, "The Semantics of Judging", Southern California Law Review, 54 (1981)
82. Michelman Franklin, "Cases and Materials on tort Law and Alternatives, 3d. ed" (1983), Foundation Press
83. Michelman I, Frank, "A Brief Anatomy of Adjudicative Rule-Formalism", Chicago Law Review, 66 (1999)
84. Morton J. Horwitz, "The Transformation of American Law: 1870-1970" (1990), Harvard University Press
85. Oliver Lepsius, "The Quest for Middle Range Theories in German Public Law", International Journal of Constitutional Law, 12(3), pp.692~ (2014)
86. Oliver W. Holmes, "Collected Legal Papers" (1952), Peter Smith
87. Paul K. Ryu, "Korean Culture and Criminal Responsibility" (2011), Bobmunsa
88. Peter L. Strauss, "Formal and Functional Approaches to Separation of Powers Questions - A Foolish Inconsistency?", Cornell Law Review, 72 (1987)
89. Peter L. Strauss, "The Place of Agencies in Government: Separation of Powers and the Fourth Branch", Columbia Law Review, 84 (1984)
90. Peter Lee, "Patent Law and the Two Cultures", Yale Law Journal, 120 (2010)
91. Pierre J. Schlag, "Rules And Standards", UCLA Law Review, 33 (1985)
92. Powel, "The Original Understanding of Original Intent", Harvard Law Review, 98 (1985)
93. Randy. Barnett, "An Originalism for non-Originalists", Loyolar Law Review, 45 (1999)
94. R. H. Fallon, Jr, "The Core of an Uneasy Case for Judicial Review", Har. L.R, 121, pp.1693~1736 (2008)
95. Richard A. Posner, "Formalist and Instrumentalist Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory", California Law Review, 73 (1985)
96. Richard A. Posner, "Legal Formalism, Legal Realism, and the Interpretation of Statutes and The Constitution", Case Western Reserve Law Review, 37(2) (1987)
97. Robert Alexy, "A Theory of Constitutional Rights" (2009), Oxford University Press
98. Ronald Dworkin, "The Arduous Virtue of Fidelity: Originalism, Scalia, Tribe, and Nerve", Fordham Law Review, 65 (1997)
99. Ronald Dworkin, "Law's Empire" (1986), Harvard University Press
100. Ronald M. Dworkin, "The Model of Rules", Chicago Law Review, 35(14) (1967)
101. Schwartz, Bernard, "The Warren Court: A Retrospective" (1996), Oxford University Press
102. Sidney W. DeLong, "Placid Clear-Seeming Words: Some Realism About the New Formalism", San Diego Law Review, 38(13) (2001)
103. Sidney W. DeLong, "Placid, Clear-Seeming Words: Some Realism About the New Formalism", San Diego Law Review, 38 (2001)
104. William J. Brennan, Jr., "Constitutional Adjudication and the Death Penalty: A View From the Court", Harvard Law Review, 100 (1986)
105. William N. Eskridge, Jr., "Relationships between Formalism and Functionalism in Separation of Power Cases", Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 22 (1998)
106. Zachary Elkins, "The Endurance Of National Constitutions" (2009)

관련 논문AI추천