본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

임상시험에서 취약성(vulnerability) 판단 기준 재정립과 임상시험심사위원회의 역할

Re-conceptualization of vulnerability in clinical trials and the role of Institutional Review Board

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류의학일반

초록

Vulnerability typically has been understood in terms of the ability to give or withhold informed consent and the likelihood of being misled, mistreated, or otherwise taken advantage of in research. The re-conceptualization of vulnerability from something that emerges primarily from membership in a specific population to a reality that emerges from characteristics of persons or the environment in which research is conducted also can inform IRB(Institutional Review Board)s’ interpretation and application of the regulations and guidelines on clinical trials. Vulnerability should be evaluated by IRBs, which have the responsibility of identifying those persons who may require additional protections. This article argues that the widespread and inconsistent use of the concept of vulnerability in Korea has hindered the development of substantive ethical guidance and concrete regulations. It is argued, furthermore, that in order to protect patient welfare and justice, the category of vulnerability should be specified at the time at which a subject consents to participate in medical research.

Abstract

Vulnerability typically has been understood in terms of the ability to give or withhold informed consent and the likelihood of being misled, mistreated, or otherwise taken advantage of in research. The re-conceptualization of vulnerability from something that emerges primarily from membership in a specific population to a reality that emerges from characteristics of persons or the environment in which research is conducted also can inform IRB(Institutional Review Board)s’ interpretation and application of the regulations and guidelines on clinical trials. Vulnerability should be evaluated by IRBs, which have the responsibility of identifying those persons who may require additional protections. This article argues that the widespread and inconsistent use of the concept of vulnerability in Korea has hindered the development of substantive ethical guidance and concrete regulations. It is argued, furthermore, that in order to protect patient welfare and justice, the category of vulnerability should be specified at the time at which a subject consents to participate in medical research.

참고문헌 (19)

  1. 2010. 08. 25 식품의약품안전청 고시, , ~, pp.제2010-63호
  2. Ana SI, "Introduction: Vulnerability in Biomedical Research", J law med ethics, pp.6~11 (2009)
  3. Cynthia MD, "Protecting Study Volunteers in Research", pp.139~168 (2004), Centerwatch
  4. Dan B, "Limited english proficiency and disparities in clinical research", J law med ethics, pp.28~37 (2009)
  5. "Intercultural cancer center council,cancer fact sheets"[URL]
  6. Klausner S, "Eskimo Capitalists: oil, alcohol and social changes", Allenheld and Osmun
  7. Kremers MS, "Initial experience using the Food and Drug administration guidelines for emergency research without consent", Ann Emerg Med, 41, pp.72~78 (2003)
  8. Longstreth WT, "Randomized clinical trial of magnesium, diazepam, or both after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest", Neurology, 59, pp.506~514 (2002)
  9. Mello MM, "The Havasupai Indian tribe case-lessons for research involving stored biologic samples", N Engl J Med, 363(3), pp.204~207 (2010)
  10. Nicole MD, "Does the emergency exception from informed consent process protect research subjects?", ACAD EMERG MED, 12(11), pp.1056~1059 (2005)
  11. Phillips KA, "Perceptions of Ashkenazi Lewish breast cancer patients on genetic testing for mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2", Clin Genet, 57(5), pp.376~383 (2000)
  12. The National Commission for the protection of Human subjects of Biomedical and behavioral Research. The Belmont Report, , ~ (1979)
  13. "Profile of general demographic charateristics"[URL]
  14. 셸던 H 헤리스, "일본의 야망과 죽음의 공장", pp.141~184 (2002), 눈과 마음
  15. "연합뉴스 1998. 05. 14", ~
  16. 의약품 임상시험 관리기준 식품의약품안전청 고시, , ~, pp.제2009-211호 (2009)
  17. "의약품 임상시험 관리기준 제17조 제9항", ~
  18. "의약품 임상시험 관리기준 제7조 제8항", ~
  19. 최병인, "생명과학 연구윤리 교육과정. 피험자 보호와 연구윤리 편. 보수과정 I,I I", pp.25~39 (2010), 지코사이언스

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)