본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

보건의료자원의 거시적 배분과 민주주의적 정당성

Macro-allocation of Health Care Resources and Democratic Legitimacy

0

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류의학일반

초록

Almost all countries in the world experience a scarcity of health care resources and the need to ration health care services. Each medical system is faced with difficult decisions concerning treatment coverage and priorities. Current methods of allocation are based on (1) substantial principles of justice, (2) cost-effectiveness analysis, (3) cost-value analysis, and (4) market mechanisms. Given these methods of allocating health care services, the question of legitimacy is rightfully raised. The question of legitimacy needs to be approached in an orderly manner. In the first place, the concept of democratic legitimacy needs to be articulated. Secondly, current methods of allocation must be evaluated. Thirdly, a legitimate method of allocation is needed. This article concentrates on the first and the second step. I argue that current methods of allocation fail to satisfy a democratic conception of legitimacy. However, this conclusion does not mean that these methods of allocating should be totally rejected. Each of these methods has an important element that at least contributes to democratic legitimacy. Based upon the evaluation provided in this article, I introduce a very promising method of allocating health care services, one developed by N. Daniels and J. Sabin.

Abstract

Almost all countries in the world experience a scarcity of health care resources and the need to ration health care services. Each medical system is faced with difficult decisions concerning treatment coverage and priorities. Current methods of allocation are based on (1) substantial principles of justice, (2) cost-effectiveness analysis, (3) cost-value analysis, and (4) market mechanisms. Given these methods of allocating health care services, the question of legitimacy is rightfully raised. The question of legitimacy needs to be approached in an orderly manner. In the first place, the concept of democratic legitimacy needs to be articulated. Secondly, current methods of allocation must be evaluated. Thirdly, a legitimate method of allocation is needed. This article concentrates on the first and the second step. I argue that current methods of allocation fail to satisfy a democratic conception of legitimacy. However, this conclusion does not mean that these methods of allocating should be totally rejected. Each of these methods has an important element that at least contributes to democratic legitimacy. Based upon the evaluation provided in this article, I introduce a very promising method of allocating health care services, one developed by N. Daniels and J. Sabin.

참고문헌 (15)

  1. Brock D, "Ethical Issues in the Use of Cost Effectiveness Analysis for the Prioritisation of Health Care Resources, in Public health, Ethics, and Equity", pp.216~221 (2004), Oxford University Press
  2. Brock, D, "Priority to the Worse Off in Health-Care Resource Prioritization, in Medicine and Social Justice", pp.367~370 (2002), Oxford University Press
  3. Cohen J, "Process and Substance in Deliberative Democracy, in Philosophy and Democracy", pp.17~ (2003), Oxford University Press
  4. Cohen J, "For a Democratic Society, in The Cambridge Companion to Rawls", pp.129~131 (2003), Cambridge University Press
  5. Cohen J, "Process and Substance in Deliberative Democracy, in Deliberative Democracy", pp.414~415 (1997), MIT Press
  6. Daniels N, "Setting Limits Fairly", pp.4~164 (2002), Oxford University Press
  7. Daniels N, "Is there a right to health care and, if so, what does it encompass? In A Companion to Bioethics", pp.322~323 (1998), Blackwell Publishers Ltd
  8. Gutmann A, "Why Deliberative Democracy?", pp.3~15 (2004), Princeton University Press
  9. Gutmann, A., "Democracy and Disagreement" (1996), Harvard University Press
  10. Justice, Health, "Health and Health Care, in Medicine and Social Justice" (2002), Oxford University Press
  11. Rawls J, "Political Liberalism", pp.36~224 (1993), Columbia University Press
  12. Simmons AJ, "Legitimacy, in Encyclopedia of Ethics", pp.961~962 (2001), Routledge
  13. Wikler D, "Macro-allocation: dividing up the health care budget, in Companion to Bioethics", pp.313~314 (1998), Blackwell Publishers Ltd
  14. 박상혁, "정의로운 의료체계에 관한 연구", 의료정책포럼, 통권 : 6, pp.60~66 (2008)
  15. 양봉민, "보건경제학", pp.406~436 (2006), 나남출판

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)